theres so much good advice for #storyboarding more ~dynamic~ shots! but tbh I sometimes find myself fiending to make EVERY shot dynamic, and end up diluting the impact & meaning
lol so yeah Wes Anderson gets a lot of (aptly deserved) attention for his gorgeous use of flat shots, but I wanted to shed some light on a film that holds a few more surprises in the flat-space department: American Beauty (1999, dir Sam Mendes, DP Conrad Hall)
I mean, this film is chock FULL of gorgeous flat shots, and all expertly designed to give us a TON of story information in each image. Here are some faves:
Visual language changes film to film. Tho we usually think of up-shots as powerful, down-shots as vulnerable, flat shots as placid, deep-space shots as dynamic; these aren't hard rules. In fact, the director's job is to invent new visual rules with each/entire film!
real quick, here's what I mean by flat shots / flat space
vs.
dynamic shots / deep space
American Beauty is a story about a reawakening from stagnation, strangers, and allll their consequences. In this particular film, these are some of the things that a flat-space shot is made to represent:
So, are we saying ""wow the whole entire film is shot flat, and that means yay it's good bc we did 1 thing for 2 hrs""?
nah dude
bc Mendes & Hall establish a consistent flatness thru/out the film, whenever they break that pattern with a dynamic shot, they immediately grab our attention! & boy do they!
the dynamic shot plays MORE dramatic & tense bc it CONTRASTS with the 2h of flatness!!
Indeed, other motifs and meanings arise as they side-step from the flatness. for one, typically associating dynamic shots with the neighbor boy
(so, now there's this other pattern to where they -break- the flatness... a pattern over a pattern if you will!)
Compare the 2 office scenes, esp the power dynamics & how they change. Notice how flat the scene is here, when he's trapped, stagnant, powerless...
vs how much more dynamic & off-center the shots are now- SUBTEXT GALORE!
now heres one of the few scenes w/ violence & overt tension, and the 1 and ONLY scene using hand-held shots. Cam is way more dynamic off the bat. & bc the rest of the film was so tightly controlled w/ flat shots, tension here really stands out!
And here's where I think this gets even cooler: What if you used FLAT SPACE to shoot another one of the most TENSE moments in the film??
It's Act 3, & here's what I'm talkin bout- (damn spoilers in the video title but ok)
so, right before this scene, the Colonel had secretly witnessed, thru the garage window, what looked like his son being exploited by the neighbor Lester (KS). Now, the cold-blooded Colonel heads next door to confront him...
And yet, the scene stays flat! Why??
Flat shots here actually spell MORE intensity than dynamic ones, bc they reflect Lester's UNAWARENESS of the danger he's in, which puts him in even MORE danger
That dramatic irony is TENSE. The audience experiences the terror FOR him: "Run away! Stop the small talk!"
As Hitchcock once said, ""there is no terror in the bang, only in the anticipation of it."
By now, we have learned Mendes' visual language of flat/deep, & we anticipate a deep dynamic shot the same way we anticipate the bang. Draw out the tension - withhold the bang!
And then here's the other thing- when u reinvent the meaning of certain shot types, & UPHOLD that meaning thru/out the ENTIRE film, ur creating a visual language!
and u can really say so much more as filmmaker if u think beyond cramming subtext into 1 shot
Visual language is where deep, rich subtext is created -- over SEVERAL shots & sequences, not just 1!
THIS is the invisible glue (the ether btwn the frames) that makes a film WHOLE. and tbh this is what I had the hardest time finding/learning when I started boarding
I can't recommend this enough: Bruce Block's Visual Story book digs deep into the many different ways u can analyze or create ur own visual language (which is what inspired this film study!). Or watch this film urself & lmk what you find too!
Me reading Bruce Block:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ello! Me again :) I've been wanting to do another #storyboarding thread on some techniques to simplify the #filmmaking process -- to help answer that ever-nagging question: WHAT SHOT COMES NEXT?
Let's start with the first idea here: "SHOT / REVERSE SHOT." You might actually hear this a bit more in live-action filmmaking. But what does it mean exactly? I really like this definition from joe940 on Slideshare. plus adding my paraphrasing:
so let's back up & imagine you *IRL* are observing a conversation - to follow along, your eyes naturally move back and forth between the two ppl as either one speaks, or lingers on one as they react in an interesting way or as they take a moment to ponder...
Dovetailing off some previous thoughts on character POV, I wanted to do a dedicated #film study of 'Drive' (2011). specifically, the way camera & editing create a rich, cinematic POV -- and for a protagonist who rarely speaks! (that's one BIG directing challenge!) #feboardary
a quick recap on POV: it's important for board artists and filmmakers alike to shoot scenes with a POV, bc THIS is the movie magic that connects the audience to the story & makes them feel what the characters are feeling
Drive is about a man of few words, no name, & many talents: driving for movie stunts by day & getaway cars by night. He's a loner, at times shy, but a meticulous professional with a strict code. ppl talk at him or about him or for him, but this is undoubtedly HIS story
so i think the MOST important job of a #storyboard artist is not creating dynamic angles or cool images, but shooting scenes & telling stories with a POINT OF VIEW!
Who are we following? Whose eyes do we see the story thru? [a thread] #feboardary
@looseyliu ofc, it's important first to know WHOSE STORY IS IT? (you usually find the answer by asking, 'which character experiences the most change'?)
as we break films apart into smaller pieces, that question then becomes: whose SCENE is it? or whose SHOT is it?
@looseyliu maybe the 'cheapest' way to put the audience in a character's POV is thru voice-over, and it's generally pretty effective in how directly it affects ur experience of a story - the character is telling you exactly how they see it!