The Chateau fight scene from MATRIX RELOADED remains one of the most impressively crafted pieces of action cinema I've ever seen: exciting, precise, meaningful, kinetic. Every detail in this scene is important. Its place in the story, its set, its props, its direction. Thread ⬇️
I remember some friends at the time complaining that this scene was pointless: at this stage in the series, Neo is omnipotent, invincible. Why show us a fight against nameless fighters? The answer lies in the images themselves. In the matrix, the colour red is associated with...
...truth. See: the red pill, the woman in red, etc. Neo bleeds 3 times while in the matrix, once each film. In the 1st and the 3rd film, he bleeds from the mouth when fighting Agent Smith. So the truth is spoken in red: "My name is Neo" / "Because I choose to". These words...
...define his being and his reason for being, respectively. This time, Neo bleeds when he stops a blade with his hand. However, he says nothing. The truth must therefore be sought in his actions, not his words. So what does he do? He immediately changes the fight's dynamic by...
...grabbing weapons from the Merovingian's walls. This scene is set in a room that stands for the matrix itself: the massive painting in the background represents the virtual world, the M standing for Merovingian (or... Matrix). In the same way that the Merovingian thinks he...
...has complete control over his world, Neo thinks himself an invincible Messiah. Obviously, this is about to change, and this fight scene has two roles: sum up what we know of Neo so far, and announce what will become of him, all purely visually. How? Let's focus on these...
...weapons Neo just started using, in a move that's fairly unusual to his fighting style. The first weapon he grabs is the sai, a Japanese three-pronged truncheon which, in the cultural consciousness, is thought to have originated as a farming tool repurposed by peasants to...
...defend themselves against the samurai sent by the feudal lord. In a nutshell: a weapon of rebellion. This is Neo's first identity in the matrix, that of the symbol of resistance. The second weapon he uses is a medieval sword, a weapon commonly associated with knights and...
...heroes in the Western culture. This is the weapon he keeps the longest, and the status he enjoys at this very moment (that of the superior, all powerful hero). It doesn't last forever of course, and Neo then grabs a spear. That spear happens to break very quickly, but he...
...continues using it. In Christian imagery, the broken spear is an attribute of the figure of the allegorical Synagogue, who also wears... a blindfold (like Neo will, only he doesn't know it yet). This part announces the coming fall of Neo, his blindness, and the fact that...
...he will abandon the established rules of the universe, i.e. the cyclical reboot of the matrix, just like the Synagogue lets go of the Tablets of the Law. The fourth and final weapon he uses is a mace, more specifically a Morgenstern, which he uses to finish the fight. In...
...German, "Morgenstern" means "morning star", which is exactly what we see in REVOLUTIONS' final shot, once Neo's sacrifice has made the last reboot possible for a new, more hopeful future. One can also notice a slight difference in fighting style depending on the weapon used:
the sai encourages Neo to defend, dodge, and disarm. He doesn't actually kill anyone with them, simply resists/incapacitates his opponents successfully. As soon as he takes hold of the sword, Neo starts using a lot more blunt force, eventually plunging his blade into one of...
...the fighters. Again, he kills no one with his broken spear, instead using his opponents' mistakes to reduce the number of adversaries. He obviously kills his final opponent (Tiger Chen!) himself with the Morgenstern. The choreography thus highlights the way the hero...
...approaches violence at different stages of his life: defense and survival when joining the resistance and going through his existential crisis, extreme prejudice when thinking himself a godlike messiah, and finally short, necessary force to conclude his journey.
Naturally, the Wachowskis adapt their mise en scène to their intent, and present Neo in different ways according to the stages outlined with the weapons. First, Neo is attacked on a horizontal plan, by an attacker coming from below (he doesn't think himself or them superior but..
...they do force him to plunge into their world). As soon as he gets the sword, he attacks his enemies from the higher ground, again in a low angle shot, this time with a different meaning. Unsurprisingly, the first strike he takes with the spear leads to its breaking, and...
...happens in a low angle shot highlighting the power of his adversary. The final strike is the complete opposite, with the same fighter now in Neo's place, and Neo dealing the final blow from above. Notice also the contrast in the way both victorious stages are filmed:
...the killing with the sword (the unquestioned hero phase) is highlighted with a slo-mo while Neo literally falls on his dying opponent; the epitome of cool. But the final strike against Chen is more cut, and off-screen (!) : there is no glory or joy in this kill, only necessity
This scene is a perfect example of narrative action: even when the story structure seems to suggest there is nothing at stake in this moment, the filmmaking reveals that actually, everything is at stake here, or at least the whole arc of the main character. Of course, my...
...interpretation rests on the shoulders of one important assumption: that the Wachowskis did nothing randomly or haphazardly. Some people might not agree, and that's fine: we all look at art differently. But looking at the whole trilogy, I absolutely believe there are no...
...coincidences in their writing. Each time Neo bleeds in the matrix is therefore of the utmost importance. Bleeding from the mouth announces a spoken truth, and bleeding from the hand announces a performed truth. The pause inserted at this instant demands we pay close attention.
In any case, I think a lot of people will agree that on a purely visual and martial level, this scene fucking owns. Keanu, Chad Stahelski, David Leitch, Tiger Chen, all essential figures of action cinema from nearly 20 years ago to today. Enjoy some behind the scene goodness:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with One Perfect HEADshot

One Perfect HEADshot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HeadExposure

18 Feb 20
Late to the party so sorry if it's been said before but the Bruce Lee scene in ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD is shot as a one take until the very moment Cliff throws Lee into the car. Plus, the set suddenly becomes empty for no reason. It could suggest unreliable recollection or
perhaps the fact that the scene suddenly becomes a fantasy, an imagined outcome to this encounter. Why would everyone but one extra disappear from the scene after the one take ends? That makes no sense story-wise, so the reason must be something else. Maybe Cliff convinced...
himself that he "beat" Bruce Lee and the images going through his mind reflect this fictionality. It's like the set becomes a hyper-set, the stage for a new play within the film, a form of meta-narrative signifier. 🤔
Read 4 tweets
23 Jan 20
In PARASITE Bong Joon-ho uses carefully storyboarded shots to involve the viewer every step of the way. I believe the film clicks w/ many people because it makes complete sense on a sensory level. Its visual language flows better than most other films'. Let's thread an example:👇 Image
Consider the recurring series of "car scenes". Bong uses primarily 3 types of shots, and gives them various weight/meaning through editing and other techniques:

1/ The Master shot, which shows both characters at the same time, one in foreground, one in background. ImageImage
2/ The Passenger's POV shot, which shows the driver as seen from the back seat.

3/ The Side shot, which can show either character from the side, with no connection to the other character in the car. ImageImageImageImage
Read 27 tweets
13 Jan 20
Hollywood fights are often shot by several cameramen catching action as best they can. Scenes are assembled by alternating long shots w/ closer ones. In HK, no camera position is repeated. Here each image is composed around a specific action and other actions require other setups
Brilliant break down of the scene by David Bordwell:

"The handcuffing phase of the scene gives us eighteen shots in only twenty-four seconds, making this passage as rapid-fire as any edit- happy Hollywood director might wish. Yet each shot is absolutely legible."
"The scene shows how the pause/burst/pause pattern can be modulated by the pace of editing. Often the cuts link movement smoothly across shots (8.88–8.89), but a shot can also highlight a marked beat, from the most vivid action to lesser ones (8.84–8.85)."
Read 7 tweets
20 Nov 19
What are your favourite action scenes of the decade? Here are a few of mine:

SPL 2: A TIME FOR CONSEQUENCES (Soi Cheang, 2015)

Perhaps the most eloquent example of 'non-verbal dialogue' of recent memory, where each move is made in response to another. Grandiose in every aspect.
BAAHUBALI 2: THE CONCLUSION (S. S. Rajamouli, 2017)

A testament to India's willingness and ability to create subjugating cinema through images that forever seared themselves to my memory. Everything is possible, as long as it serves the spectacle.
THE TAKING OF TIGER MOUNTAIN (Tsui Hark, 2014)

After treading lightly on the fine line that separates mainstream entertainment from government-sanctioned propaganda, Tsui Hark concludes his adventure epic with the most gleefully pulpy action sequence he ever filmed.
Read 31 tweets
6 Nov 19
THE BLADE (1995) features one of my favourite fight sequences. Through cinematic devices, Tsui Hark takes apart and reconfigures the wuxia pian. He creates a hybrid form of action/'cinéma vérité' where the camera has a hard time keeping up with the fighters. That's because...
...the world he creates in still in its primal years. It's a wuxia pian without jiang hu, or at least without the fully formed, heroic jiang hu that defines the genre. There is no honour, no bravery, no chivalry. That is, until this moment, the final fight, when Ding On becomes..
...the archetypal xia through his slaying of Fei Lung. It's a cosmogonic moment, the moment when the jiang hu is born and characters can start acting like they usually do in the genre. Even the musical progression of the scene conveys the same idea. It starts off with a barrage..
Read 12 tweets
14 Jan 19
On Chinese New Year, THE WANDERING EARTH, the first full-scale big budget space science-fiction film from China, will open in theatres. There will be many more to come. So here's a thread about previous and proto-SF Chinese movies, to try and wait (im)patiently.
It started in Hong Kong, then a British colony. Hong Kong films were mainly produced by private funds, with little to no money (and less control) from the state. The first Chinese-speaking sci-fi film was RIOTS IN OUTER SPACE (Wong Tin-lam, 1959).
The comedy film, produced by Cathay, is seemingly lost (anyone knows where to find it, give me a shout!). It was about two workers from a firecrackers factory who are brought to the hospital after an explosion. They dream of travelling to Venus and Mars.
Read 82 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!