I suspect a lot of utilities, regulators, & policymakers are asking themselves: is our power system prepared for climate change? Below, a short thread with suggested analyses and action items in prioritized order. Would love to hear other's thoughts.
1. What is your planning horizon? Are your IRPs, reliability analyses, capacity markets, etc looking out far enough ahead to ensure that investments now will fare well in 10, 20, 30 years?
2. Are you using prospective datasets? We have exited a stationary world, which means using historic data is not good enough. HighResMIP & ScenarioMIP are new datasets with useful data. Analog approaches could also work. Don't sweat the RCPs - they are similar through midcentury.
[Of course, historic data are still useful. Lots of extreme weather events are available in 40+ years of reanalysis data. And some of these "new" events are not necessarily new. Exhibit A:
3. Are you capturing the interaction between your climate mitigation and adaptation activities? Think of what TX would look like now if all heating was electrified, a point others have made. Our paper found significant overlap in mit & adap. pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.102…
4. Have you broadened your scope to consider compound events? There is a great emerging lit on this in the climate space. nature.com/articles/s4301… . A great ex: fires in CA reducing PV generation by 20%! Again: 20%! Likely concurrent heat-driven impacts. eia.gov/todayinenergy/…
5. Is your market design compatible with long-term needs under clim change? Better experts on markets than me (@jacob_mays for one). But does climate change require a coordinated planning response, rather than letting individ utilities use different CC projects in an E only mkt?
6. Are you harnessing climate-resilient flexibility? Storage could have helped in TX, but we would have needed a lot. Same for electrified heating DR. Gas plants are often relied on for flexibility, but this (& other events) underscore the peril of this thinking.
Electrified heating will again play a large role here (an expert: @parth_PIT ). Let's also not forget that thermal forced outage rates are HIGHLY temperature dependent (researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%…).
Really lastly: 1. the speed of research needed in this case really makes me despair inside the ivory tower. And 2. @JesseJenkins great quant stuff this week, thanks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why I think energy-only markets will not work in a changing climate: (1) they assume rational actors with perfect information and (2) the limits on letting the market reflect real scarcity pricing will likely only get worse.
(1) The underlying premise - profit-maximizing gencos will have a strong incentive to invest given scarcity pricing. As @JesseJenkins pointed out - every gas plant offline wishes they were online. They would have printed $$$ the past few days.
Setting aside TX now & looking more broadly, this would require each genco to grapple w/ changing weather and update their priors regarding the frequency and severity of extreme events (and price spikes).
How much has the #TexasBlackout cost? I've been thinking a lot about this. Planning is all about balancing risks - the risk of overinvesting and spending unnecessary $, and the risk of underinvesting and incurring the costs of losing electricity access.
How do we quantify those costs of losing access? They are largely non-monetary, especially when you think of the pain, suffering, and deaths we have seen. And then there's plenty of other damages we don't normally include, like home damage from burst pipes.
But we can try to put a price tag on the "value of lost load" (VOLL) through various methods - surveys, production functions, prior blackouts. ("What would you pay to have power?")