Two competing effects influence our northern winters:
#1 Global warming.
#2 Increasing polar air outbreaks due to stratospheric polar vortex disturbances.
In the long run #1 wins - our winters are getting warmer. 1/🧵
That's expected as #2 just happens occasionally, and polar air is also getting warmer.
Some people point to long-term warming trends to cast doubt on whether #2 is even real, but that is a non-sequitur. It just means #1 wins in the long run. 2/🧵
That disturbed stratospheric polar vortex states are linked to polar air outbreaks and thus cold extremes either in Eurasia or the US is shown by data analysis: nature.com/articles/s4161… 3/🧵
Objective cluster analysis of polar vortex states shows that cluster 4 is linked to cold in the US, cluster 5 to cold in Eurasia. 4/🧵
Do these clusters increase in prevalence? The reanalysis data shows they do over the period 1979-2018. And this can explain why Eurasian winters haven't warmed more: agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10… But of course that could be just due to random variability. 5/🧵
On the other hand there are plausible mechanisms that link this increasing polar vortex instability to Arctic warming and sea ice loss. Causal effect network analysis (a data correlation method able to tease out causal links) suggests that: journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/… 6/🧵
Furthermore, analysis of 35 CMIP5 models shows that the sea ice loss effect, though weaker in the models than in the observational data, "can explain all of the projected ensemble-mean stratospheric polar vortex weakening": wcd.copernicus.org/articles/1/715… 7/🧵
To finish off, a fun fact: in 2014 right-wing US commentator Rush Limbaugh claimed the polar vortex was invented by the left... Against that speaks that it's already in the 1959 AMS Glossary of Meteorology.
I was shocked when I first saw these results from standard climate models used in IPCC reports:
for high emissions, the Atlantic overturning circulation #AMOC shuts down in all 9 models that ran
past 2100, and is well on the way to shutdown by 2100.
Our paper is out today. 🧵
The latest climate model generation CMIP6 consists of models from institutes around the world.
The IPCC report found that the crucial Atlantic Ocean circulation #AMOC will weaken. Now
some of the models have been continued beyond year 2100 and reveal a high risk of full
shutdown.
Even more worrying: the tipping point where the shutdown becomes inevitable appears to be
when deep convection in the northern Atlantic stops. This tends to happen in the next few
decades in these models, see two examples. Despite the models not even including Greenland
ice loss!
We see here a self-styled "honest broker" with decades of experience in downplaying climate change presenting an age-old climate denial trope: using *annual* rainfall data as argument against an increase in *extreme* rainfall.
Does he *really* not know better?
Brief 🧵1/4
What scientists have predicted since the 1980s is an increase in heavy rain at the expense of days with light or no precipitation. And that is indeed observed. See @Knutti_ETH That is because warmer air can hold more moisture (Clausius-Clapeyron law). 2/4 nature.com/articles/nclim…
That means an air mass saturated with water will hold 7% more water per degree of warming, so 7% more can rain out, all else remaining the same. Heavy rain gets that much stronger.
Why doesn't that apply to annual rainfall totals? Because those are ruled by different physics. 3/4
1. Extreme rainfall increases as global temperatures rise.
There’s a basic law of physics behind that (Clausius Claperon Law, known since 1834, see Wikipedia).
And numerous analyses of weather station data prove it. See e.g. ours. nature.com/articles/s4161…
2. Global warming is caused by fossil fuel emissions. That is why it was predicted correctly before it was even observed. And even by scientists from fossil fuel companies like Exxon Mobil. But their bosses decided to tell you a different story.
A new study by van Westen et al. shows that the #tippingpoint of the Atlantic overturning circulation #AMOC is also found in a high-resolution ocean model which resolves ocean eddies. A first, but no surprise to AMOC experts. 🧵
To find the tipping point you need to do a very slow, long hysteresis model run. That is so computationally expensive that it hasn't been tried before. All models which have tried show this tipping point - we published a first intercomparison in 2005. 🧵 agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
So all kind of models since Stommel's 1961 box model show it, due to the destabilising salt transport feedback. The new model also shows the well-known sea surface temperature fingerprint pattern of an #AMOC shutdown: the 'cold blob', and warming along the American coast. 🧵
Zur Erinnerung: Kernfusion ist /keine/ Klimalösung sondern klimaschädlich. (Nur falls jemand auf die Idee kommt, diese Träume von Merz mit Klimaschutzgeldern zu subventionieren.)
Kurzer Thread in 5 Bildern.
2024 war global das heißeste Jahr seit Beginn der Aufzeichnungen, mit 1,6 Grad über dem Temperaturniveau des späten 19. Jahrhunderts. Kleiner Thread mit Datengrafiken dazu. 🧵
In Deutschland war es ebenfalls das wärmste Jahr seit Beginn der Aufzeichnungen - allerdings schon 3,1 Grad wärmer. Weil Deutschland ein Landgebiet ist, erwärmt es sich doppelt so schnell wie der globale Mittelwert, der 71% Meeresfläche enthält. 🧵
Diese moderne Erderwärmung ist praktisch komplett vom Menschen verursacht. Natürliche Faktoren haben weniger als + oder - 0,1 °C beigetragen. Das ist eine Kernaussage des Weltklimarats IPCC. Eher - als +, weil die Sonnenaktivität etwas abgenommen hat. 🧵