If you want to understand Rush Limbaugh's poisonous impact on our politics, you couldn't ask for a better guide than @rickperlstein, the great historian of the New Right.

So I talked to Perlstein at length about Limbaugh. Great big-picture stuff here:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@rickperlstein A few highlights.

First, @rickperlstein notes that even back in the late 1980s, it was already clear that Limbaugh had a genius for making reactionary whites feel like they belonged to a movement, like they had a home:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@rickperlstein .@rickperlstein also points to how badly Limbaugh "deranged our public life."

"People were being taught that nothing liberals could do, nothing Democrats could do, could be anything but a diabolical conspiracy to destroy them."

Great context here:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@rickperlstein You kiddies on here don't know how bad the right could be in the 1990s.

Well, @rickperlstein gives us an extremely bracing reminder.

This is a big part of Limbaugh's legacy:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@rickperlstein Importantly, @rickperlstein notes that the Limbaugh/Gingrich nationalization of scorched earth politics actually took *southern* politics national.

And Limbaugh's reactionary audience had affluent components, just like the 1/6 rioters:

(cc @AdamSerwer)

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@rickperlstein @AdamSerwer And finally, here @rickperlstein takes us straight from Rush Limbaugh to birtherism to Trump and QAnon and Marjorie Taylor Greene and the violent insurrection at the Capitol:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThePlumLineGS

18 Feb
Texas is showing the future Republicans want: One in which they respond to large public challenges by retreating into their alternate information universe and insulating themselves from accountability with redoubled countermajoritarian tactics. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Unsurprisingly, Rep. Lauren Boebert succeeded in taking the phony anti-elite posturing to towering heights of stupidity.

And Rick Perry did a bang-up job exposing the utter bankruptcy of the conservative response to Texas as well:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
On Fox News, Gov. Greg Abbott blamed wind and solar for the Texas disaster.

But the thing is, he *knows* this is nonsense. He admitted elsewhere that the problem was natural gas and coal!

The rub is that the pull of the Fox News vortex is irresistible:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 5 tweets
17 Feb
Trumpism is devolving into:

* Undying fealty to QAnon crackpottery about the election

* Endless hating on Trumpism's phantom enemies (AOC, Antifa)

* Tucker Carlson blaming Texas blackouts on wind power

That actually gives Dems a big opening. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
There's a fascinating tension at the core of the intra-GOP war over Trump.

On one hand, Trump cost GOP the WH and Congress.

On the other, Rs see him as a success for activating millions of new voters.

This tension is the crux of the problem for them:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Republicans have made their choice: Their future depends on keeping those new Trump voters in the GOP coalition.

Solution: Double down on the QAnon lunacy about the election and the nonstop hating on the enemies that have come to define Trumpism:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 5 tweets
16 Feb
Everyone is laughing at this GOP quote about Pat Toomey:

"We did not send him there to do the right thing. We sent him there to represent us."

But the idea that "representing" GOP voters means impunity for Trump is the mainstream GOP position. New piece:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
This is a bad development. It's becoming commonplace to hear Republicans claim that *representing GOP voters* requires maintaining fealty to the stolen-election myth and demands refraining from holding Trump accountable for inciting violent insurrection:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
It's telling that Trump lickspittle Lindsey Graham says Lara Trump represents the "future of the GOP."

The future of the GOP belongs to those who maintain fealty to the alt-narrative of 2020, that Trump was the victim of a series of monstrous injustices:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
Damning new facts show Trump may have known Pence's life was in danger when Trump attacked Pence during the insurrection. Democrats simply must call witnesses. If Trump knowingly pointed this loaded gun at Pence, we need to know the full story. New piece:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
I talked to a former Secret Service agent, who explained to me what Trump might have known about the danger Pence was in when Trump whipped up the mob against him.

This former agent says witnesses could help reconstruct what Trump knew and when:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
I don't see how Dems can refrain from a full accounting, with witnesses, given what we've learned.

This isn't for Rs, who are hopeless. It's for the American people and for history.

I tried to rebut objections:

(others like @Timodc have been good here)

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 6 tweets
11 Feb
Mark it down: Most elected Republicans will end up comprehensively absolving Trump of any and all responsibility for inspiring the attack. His role will be erased entirely. @LindseyGrahamSC's abject toadying on Fox shows where this is all going. My latest:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@LindseyGrahamSC News accounts keep claiming Dems have "failed to persuade" GOP senators to break with Trump. This framing is all wrong. It implies most Republicans have principled objections to the case against Trump. Everyone covering this trial knows that's nonsense:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
@LindseyGrahamSC People have rightly ragged on Graham's "what did Pelosi know and when did she know it" idiocy.

But it's also worth noting that the underlying argument -- some preplanned Jan 6, and this exonerates Trump -- is also nonsense. These known facts demolish it:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets
9 Feb
Let's drop this bad framing which says GOP senators must choose whether to be "loyal" to Trump or not. Their choice is actually between being loyal to Trump and being faithful to their oath to defend the Constitution. Sorry: It can't be both. New piece:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Trump's lawyers will argue the Senate "lacks jurisdiction" to convict him, because he's no longer in office.

This is BS. But it also reveals how badly GOP senators want to avoid taking a stand on what Trump actually did, revealing their own dereliction:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Trump's lawyers say he didn't "direct anyone" to wage the assault, and that he couldn't have incited the assault because some "preplanned" it.

It's hogwash. He deliberately sought to disrupt our constitutional processes with violence and intimidation:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!