We made it, everyone! It's the conclusion of the discussion of the mercantile system! (IV.viii.) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The mercantile system tries to maintain the “balance of trade” by encouraging exports and discouraging imports. Counterintuively, sometimes that's done by encouraging imports. (IV.viii.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Manufacturers demand that their inputs be imported without duties or with bounties. Smith thinks that's a great start, but they should eliminate all duty on manufacturing imports, not just the ones demanded by the manufacturers. (IV.viii.2–3) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Unfortunately, that isn't going to happen. Manufacturers use politicians to protect their interests above all else, and this is super transparent if you look at what they do. (IV.viii.4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
To make sure they can sell their wares at the highest possible price they demand:
- Bounties on their exports
- Duties on competing imports
- Prohibition of the stiffest competition. (IV.viii.4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
To make sure they can buy their imports as cheaply as possible they demand for their inputs:
- Encouragement of imports
- Increased competition for domestic producers
- Depressed wages for workers. (IV.viii.4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
[We read sections like this and hear Smith’s obvious anger at how the poor are neglected and oppressed and wonder why people dismiss #AdamSmith as some kind of cartoon capitalist who’s out for a quick buck.] (IV.viii.4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Smith lays on the sarcasm pretty thick as he describes how smart it was to grant all of these benefits to the American colonies under the assumption that it was just an "investment" in British greatness. (IV.viii.15) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And now, a history of duties designed to discourage export:
Plus! Oppressive trade restrictions, like:
Wool must be in a leather or cloth container
with “Wool” or “Yarn” in letters > 3” high.
or you forfeit it and 3 s/lb.
No transporting it at night.
And it’s even worse in Kent & Sussex! (IV.viii.21–23) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
We, the SmithTweeters, suspect that all this suggests that at one point, there were bands of criminal yarn smugglers roving the English coast.
We would watch the heck out of that series. Stars @David_Tennant. Scripts by @neilhimself (IV.viii.21–23) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Merchants claim this was all necessary 'cause English wool was so super special that if it wasn’t exported, English textile manufacturers could monopolize the world wool trade. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
"Our wool is the specialest! It's our super power!" is one of those doctrines “confidently asserted by any number of people” who know nothing about the wool trade and who can't be bothered to learn. (IV.viii.24) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Anyway, all this pushes down the price of wool. Even at an artificially low price, there's lots of wool because sheep are raised for meat. (IV.viii.26) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The prohibition on wool exports hurts farmers to protect manufacturers.
That’s unjust. The sovereign owes every subject equal treatment.
Even accepting the need to reduce wool exports, a small tax on exports would be more just. (IV.viii.30–32) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And now, a history of inputs for English manufacturers' goods that have faced similar restrictions:
If you were as mad about anything as Smith is about the mercantile system, you'd make lots of tediously detailed lists, too!
Probably!
But for real, Smith is getting annoyed. (IV.viii.33–43) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And the capper?! Restrictions that forbid British citizens to go abroad to practice particular protected trades!
You could be fined! Imprisoned! Forfeit your property! Outlawed!
So much for the proud, freeborn Englishman! (IV.viii.44–47) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
[...We are suddenly worried that SmithTweeting may be one such protected industry. We love you Scotland, but we aren’t sure we’re ready to relocate…but maybe we can stay at @AdamSmithHouse?]
And look, like Smith's been saying: the goal of all these rules and regulations is to advantage the country not by making us wealthier, not by doing better, but by making others do worse. (IV.viii.48) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
This is all silly nonsense, and some of it is downright evil.
Everyone should have the goal of working to increase consumption! Providing for consumers is the end and purpose of all production. (IV.viii.49) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Look out for consumers, and the country will cut out bounties and duties. It will stop treating colonies as captive markets. It will stop doing a lot of things Smith just spent a lot of time saying shouldn't be done. (IV.viii.50–53) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
And—we know you’ll be shocked to hear this—but this system that ignores consumers in order to benefit merchants and manufacturers?
It was invented by the merchants and manufacturers. (IV.viii.54) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Book Five of #WealthOfNations is all about the duties of the sovereign and how to pay for them. In this first part of chapter 1, we’re talking about the cost of defense. (V.i.a) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The sovereign's duty to protect the country can only be done through military force, but how you get the money to pay for that military varies according to time, place, and circumstance. (V.i.a.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Remember how #AdamSmith was going to explain the Mercantile and Agricultural systems? After 230 pages on the Mercantile system it’s finally time for the Agricultural! ...which gets 25 pages. (IV.ix) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
He’s got a pretty good reason for keeping this brief: A national political economy based entirely on agriculture has never existed except in the minds of French philosophers. Why spend a lot of time on it? (IV.ix.1–2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The French philosophers were 😍 with the idea of a purely agricultural system because of the favoritism shown to a purely mercantile system under Louis XIV and his minister Colbert. But both systems were out of balance.(IV.ix.3–4) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
It's been a whole day since we tweeted Part 2 of this chapter, so let us remind you: #AdamSmith just said that the colonies got nothing that helped them succeed from the mother country. (IV.vii.c) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
So these two opening sentences are pretty heckin’ sarcastic:
Now we've seen the great advantages the colonies got (they got nothing!) (IV.vii.c.1)
So what have been the great advantages to Europe! (IV.vii.c.2)
Europeans buy goods from America, and Americans buy European goods as well. Even countries that don’t trade directly with America have benefited. (IV.vii.c.3–8) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
In yesterday’s discussion of colonies, #AdamSmith was really good on a lot of issues—particularly on condemning murdering Indigenous people, despoiling colonies in search of gold that ain't there, and then pretending you're doing it all for God. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Today, Smithketeers, will not be such a feel-good day. You will not be heartened. You might want to pour a cup of tea. Or something much stronger. #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Smith starts by noting that the colonies of developed nations where the “natives easily give place to the new settlers” get rich and cultured faster than anywhere else.
OK. Chapter 7 of Book 4 of #WealthOfNations is tough going. It's long. It's serious. It's all about colonies.
We can take comfort, though, in knowing that the chapter #AdamSmith says is about colonies is, in fact, about colonies. (IV.vii) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Colonies were a vexed subject when #AdamSmith was writing, and they’re even more complicated now. So, before we even get to the tweeting, here’s a link to that thread on Smith and “savage nations.” (IV.vii) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
The reason for the ancient Greeks and Romans to settle colonies was straightforward: they didn’t have enough space for their growing populations. Their colonies were treated as “emancipated children”—connected but independent. (IV.vii.a.2) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets
Dear Smithketeers. Over many chapters of #WealthOfNations, we've grown close. We were even going to ask all of you to be our Valentines.
And we have to tell you:
More like, "Of the reasons the Author is opposed to Treaties generally and the Treaty with Portugal in particular." (IV .vi) #WealthOfTweets
But FINE. Here we go:
Countries that bind themselves via a treaty to offer special treatment to the merchants and manufacturers of another country are granting them a sort of monopoly over their market. (IV. vi.1) #WealthOfTweets#SmithTweets