This is an interesting thread going. I’m not meaning to brag about my own kid, I’m just really interested in how to help a young adult sort out what they want to do without imposing any expectations on him. 1/7
I think for my son, one of the issues is that while he has always liked and done well with sciences and math, he is also very creative. In jr. high, he won awards in multi-media and visual arts. He loves doing graphic design, editing video, creating and coding computer games. 2/7
I worry that he feels obliged to follow a math/science path because he has the ability to do it when he might really be more happy with a path that is more creative but less of a ‘sure thing’ as far as future employment goes. I’ve seen students struggle with this. 3/7
One young man had a 100% *average* in my Language Arts class. He was so thoughtful, insightful, creative and expressive. His parents were pressuring him to become a dentist. I have no doubt he would have made an excellent dentist because he excelled at everything, but 4/7
would that make him fulfilled and happy? (Not at all dissing the profession of dentistry. I also know people who went into that and love it). This young man should probably have been a novelist or poet or playwright. 5/7
I taught high school at a very high academic school with the most awesome young people imaginable. I saw similar situations there. Many kids who certainly could be doctors, engineers, etc. but were also fabulous musicians and artists. And afraid of disappointing anyone. 6/7
Again, lots of people go into math and science careers and thrive and love that, so this is not a put down of those careers whatsoever. But the heart wants what it wants. Are there any careers related to creative arts, computer programming AND science, all at once? 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I deleted a post I wrote last night because it took off unexpectedly, and I was concerned that it might be too mean-spirited. This morning, I decided that I *do* want to say this:
Danielle Smith has a knack for making egregious, preposterous things sound reasonable. 1/6
Reasonable to the point that those that are inclined to believe the right wing, libertarian ideas/theories she espouses anyhow would certainly never think to fact check her, whether it is about Texas’s power grid, covid cures, Alberta being guaranteed access to tidewater...2/6
This morning on FB, one of my contacts (who has not yet been blocked *only* because we graduated from the same university, have mutual friends, and we’re distantly related) ‘wrote’ a post that was basically Smith’s column on Texas and renewable energy, nearly word for word. 3/
We’ll see how long I can last for the Alberta covid update today. It’s starting late. Are Kenney & Shandro expected?
They’re obviously going to have to spin pretty hard on the ‘pastor in shackles arrested for preaching’ story.
Shandro is starting. He is updating about contact tracing. He’s going through the numbers of how many there are. 2300 in Alberta. 41 per 100,000 Albertans.
Reasons (beyond sheer incompetence) why UCP can’t or won’t articulate their vaccination plan, despite declaring how great it was 2+ months ago:
—they don’t want to deal with the backlash that will come with announcing who they will prioritize—or not. 1/6
If they don’t say who is next until it’s just about to happen, they don’t have to answer questions about why they are wrong.
—maybe they are being pressured by rich donors to jump ahead in the queue? 2/6
—Dr. Hinshaw mentioned something about people considering the ‘ethics’ of it and this week said it was about where there would be more exposure, not about ‘who is considered to be of more value’. Kenney says they have an ‘expert panel on vaccines’. Both of these are code for 3/6
Wish list for reporters at covid update today:
-I wish they would avoid multi-part questions, because it is much easier to avoid answering some
-If Dr. Hinshaw evades a direct question, I wish someone later in the queue would repeat it, and continue until there is an answer 1/5
-Reporters are trained to ask questions that can’t be answered with ‘yes’ or ‘no’ so they can get their quotes or sound bites. I wish sometimes they would ask a yes or no question for clarity, though.
—Or alternatively, ask a question that has a number as the answer. 2/5
-For example: “In the 3 schools that had in-school transmission of the variant, how many other people caught covid as a result?”
She, of course, will have some sort of ‘It’s hard to say...’ excuse, so press the question. “More or less than 5? More than 10?” 3/5
Dr. Hinshaw says they are removing regional classifications for enhanced, watch and open because they are taking a ‘provincial approach’ to easing restrictions. I don’t really understand this.
Dr. Hinshaw is saying that it’s ‘vital that every health measure be followed at all times’ with the eased restrictions. Except...they won’t be. Because there are no consequences.
She is reinforcing that ‘measures are mandatory, not optional’ and that it is breaking the law not to follow them. But again, what will happen? It looks like nothing for that church outside Edmonton.
Albertans pride themselves on being tough and self-sufficient. (Or we used to before someone rolled up in a big blue truck to tell us we’re all victims). Seeing all these people defy health restrictions because it’s just too hard not being able to eat out, or play hockey or 1/12
see your friends at church, or not have your hair done etc., and then watching the provincial government cave on enforcing their half-hearted health measures every time is weak, not strong. We are not in a lockdown. We never have been. 2/12
We may not be able to do whatever we feel like doing, but at no time would you be prevented from leaving your house just because you felt like it. You could always shop in some non-grocery stores, get takeout food, do recreational activities outside, see at least some people 3/12