As we near closer to the touchdown of the #Mars2020 rover Perseverance, I want to note the key role that nuclear science plays here: Perseverance is powered by the radioactive decay of plutonium-238
The power source of Perseverance is not a nuclear reactor, and in fact Pu-238 isn't be a good choice for nuclear reactors because it doesn't readily fission. But its rate of radioactive decay is great for space exploration: it takes 87.7 yrs for half of the material to decay
#Mars2020 is powered by a Pu-238 radioisotope thermoelectric generator. The 87.7 year half life of Pu-238 means that RTG's can operate for a long time, for example Voyager 1, launched in 1977, is still sending signals back from its RTG. What % of the Pu mass at launch remains?
Answer: Voyager 1 currently has about 70.9% of the plutonium mass that it had at the day of its launch, September 5, 1977
RTG's give off a few hundred watts of electrical power, are relatively light, and robust with long lifetimes. They are perfect for rovers and space probes because they last longer than solar panels and are lighter than small nuclear reactors. Curiosity is powered by a similar RTG
Making a plutonium-238 RTG for #Mars2020 relies on several US national labs:
⚛️ @ORNL produces and separates the Pu in their High Flux Isotope Reactor
👩🔧 @LosAlamosNatLab fabricates the Pu-238 fuel pellets
💡 @INL puts the Pu inside the RTG and tests it
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Maybe it's just me, but I think many nuclear plants should do more to handle crisis comms on social media. This STP-1 trip is not a nuclear safety crisis, but misinformation is spreading that makes like it seems like it is. Plus the loss of power is especially poorly-timed
The website that Google previously linked when you search "South Texas Project" to is a broken Wix site. The other site I found (and recommended google change to) has a date of 2019 at the bottom and hasn't had a press release since October 2019 stpnoc.com
I toured South Texas Project nuclear plant years ago and remember being shocked that their turbine deck was open-air. "We don't really get inclement weather here", I was told. Unfortunately, unit 1 is down bc a feedwater pressure sensing line failed due to cold. Unit 2 at 100%
They gave me a nice hat though, which is by far the best swag I've gotten for just going on a plant tour
Even at 19, I had the sense that having an open-air turbine deck = wider potential for failures, even if bad weather is rare. After pushing the engineer, I was again told "these aren't safety-critical systems"... ok but if it fails, the reactor stops producing power (see: now)
Not really, but maybe someday when throwing around $250 isn't such a big deal
Only rated to 35 degrees which kinda sucks (I've camped in places that dropped below 35F in the month of August, for example), but I would absolutely put it on my future purchases list if it was rated at 0F
Let's learn about @PNNLab for the fifth "Spotlight on the National Labs" webinar!! You can register to attend here (starts at 13:00 EDT) or follow my thread below for the tl;dr 🧵👇us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…
We're hearing from EIGHT different @PNNLab employees, including lab director Steven Ashby! Ever wondered what kind of nuclear science and engineering work is going on at Pacific Northwest National Lab? Recording will be available to those who register us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…
PNNL is located in Richland, WA and is one of several laboratories that traces its roots back to the Manhattan Project. The lab has about 4700 staff, with about a quarter of the budget each going to Energy & Environment, National Security, and Science