Mr. Webster now quoting my tweet on @joannaccherry opining that Wightman and Cherry were lost in the outer house and then won on appeal.
I assume Mr. Websters intention here is to try and make out that the intention was to proceed regardless of resources.
Which is just patently ridiculous. A few tweets about rallying the troops, he seems to be saying that I should add the caveat of "resources" dependent on the..
Which is just patently ridiculous. A few tweets about rallying the troops, he seems to be saying that I should add the caveat of "resources" dependent on the..
...end of every single comment I make.
You will also note that Mr. Webster also deliberately missed out my comments on RT that the UK Government. Which for the record were a comment about the UK Government continually wasting and abusing taxpayer funds.
On the basis of his comments, I must assume that his comments are less about the case and more for the benefit of the yes supporters listening it to proceedings.
Disclaimer: The contents of this tweet is resource-dependent.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
