I have mixed feelings about this Cuomo nursing home thing. On the one hand, I just hate Andrew Cuomo, so I'm not gonna complain about anything that puts him in a bad light. On the other hand, I'd like to complain about this thing that's putting him in a bad light
I guess it's fitting for Cuomo's all-comms administration (Cuomo doesn't govern, he communicates), but this nursing home stuff feels kind of devoid of real policy substance. That Zucker memo for nursing homes to accept Covid patients certainly LOOKS bad, but it's not like NYS...
...did any worse on nursing home deaths than you'd expect from the state that got hit first. And the cover-ups about the death toll is bad, but it's not like it's not like it would've changed anything substantively if they'd released the full death toll earlier
There's a LOT to hate about Cuomo. On coronavirus alone, he was weeks behind de Blasio in ordering New Yorkers to wear masks. New York currently has the second-highest daily infection rate, and Cuomo hasn't done shit about it. There was never much of a campaign to, e.g., ...
...stop small gatherings. Indoor dining seems very questionable in light of our high infection rates. NYC's dire housing crisis, which has compounded the spread of the virus through household crowding, is the fault of state leaders, the most powerful of which is Cuomo, who...
...have taken a hands-off approach to NYC's very low construction rate and the in-state suburbs' near-moratoria on new housing. Beyond coronavirus, Cuomo has driven the MTA into the ground and chased away the most competent NYC Transit leader since the system was nationalized
Marijuana is still illegal. Local and state elections are often only slightly more democratic than Russian elections. And yet...Cuomo barely gets flak for any of that. Instead it's this kind of bullshit nursing home story. Doesn't give me much hope for a post-Cuomo New York

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Market Urbanism

Market Urbanism Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarketUrbanism

22 Feb
Transit advocates want to believe in win-win-wins and they don’t want labor strife, but there is nowhere on earth with frequent and cheap regional rail service and multiple conductors per train. One conductor MIGHT be acceptable, but abroad, it’s usually zero
We MUST bring down operating costs. Some advocates have done the math and think lower fares might be possible without labor efficiencies, but using the “social proof” heuristic – looking at systems delivering the service we want and seeing how they do it – I doubt it’s possible
In Italy, some regional rail has one conductor, I’m told, and some long trains (the type that in the NY area might have 5+ conductors) even have two. Very crowded Japanese trains often have one. But as a rule, S-Bahn and RER systems have no conductors
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct 19
.@mitchmcewen starts by quoting Audre Lorde: “For the master's tools will never dismantle the master's house.” Discusses racist origins of zoning; the quote works just as well to explain why inclusionary zoning, which cannot exist without exclusionary zoning, cannot work
She draws a line between the recently respelled cabaret law and regulation of slaves – Common Council in pre-revolutionary New York limited slaves to groups of four, dropped in the early 18th century to three
She’s leaning into this – says there’s an anti-market aspect to zoning left over from old slave codes, also something about temporary autonomous zones. Then it ends as quickly as it starts! Next presenter says he’ll propose something bold...compared to last one, I doubt it!!
Read 15 tweets
19 Nov 18
Leaving aside whether New York should've given Amazon so many tax breaks, @AliciaGlen has a good point here: people saying HQ2 in NYC was inevitable are rewriting history (100:1 is an exaggeration, but not far off) nymag.com/intelligencer/…
@AliciaGlen Another good point: Andrew Cuomo and Albany gave Amazon all the subsidies, not Bill de Blasio or City Council
@AliciaGlen Frustrating that city officials don't know the subway well enough to speak knowledgeably about it. @AliciaGlen should've said: "The G train is hugely under capacity, the 7 train's CBTC upgrade is almost done, and anyway many will reverse-commute on empty trains from Manhattan"
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!