Thread by @Nadie_lo_dijo

Allen V. Farrow, cap 1
Most of the job was done, but there are still some things to clarify.

https://twitter.com/Nadie_lo_dijo/status/1363798462014382081

For instance: Priscilla says that Woody Allen" was there every morning before the kids woke up and he was there every night until they went to sleep." But we know that Allen went to Connecticut only two days a week, not "every day" at all.

Gilman's narration gives the impression of a constant and overwhelming presence that was not true.

Gilman again, talking about "the first time" she saw Woody Allen getting out of the bed wearing just underpants.
1/In fact, he says not a word about Dylan. She saw Allen in underpants but she did not sat that Dylan was there.
2/ The first time?

Mia Farrow said that she saw (several times, it seems) Dylan in the bed of Woody Allen in his underpants. But she stated in Court that Allen was always fully dressed when playing with Dylan in bed.

I repeat this fact that I had already dealt with because the documentary conveys a sense of habitualness, of having happened many times that is even more incompatible with Mia's judicial declaration.

The source of this statement is unknown, but the therapist was Dr. Nancy Schultz and she stated in court that:
Mr. Allen and Ms. Farrow had taken the girl to her because of their concerns over her difficulties in communicating and the fact that she"lived in her own fantasy world"

Dr. Schultz seemed to be very clear about the real goals of the therapy of Dylan, but absolutely none of this appears in the documentary

Do you remember that Allen was in Connecticut twice a week instead of "every day"? Dylan played alone, with his friends and/or siblings most of the time when she was in Connecticut (four months and most of the weekends).

She was perfectly used to playing with friends without her father being, not even in the same State.

The story about Dr.Person was not told in court(what a whitness!!)and not even in her memoirs,but the story Mia told to Kristi Groteke was very different.
In any case:
1/ Dr. Persoson did not make a recommendation of a therapist for Allen. Dr. Coates was the therapist of Satchel

2/Dr Coates was not contacted because of any kind of problem with the behavior of Woody Allen, she was contacted and hired as a therapist for Satchel.
3/ Allen did not start any kind of therapy because of his "inappropriate behavior" with Dylan.

RONAN´S TIMELINE IN RELATION TO DYLANÑS STORY

Ronan was just 4 when Mia found the photos, he was just 2 when Dylan started therapy. If Dylan was shy and with that "withdraw quality" in 1990, how can Ronan remember she being "outgoing, and effervescent and talkative"

Must we believe that Ronan noticed when she was 1 that her sister was talkative and noticed when she turned two that she was shy? The timeline is just impossible.

If Ronan remembers a happy Dylan, it is the Dylan from when he was 3 years old, and if later he remembers her sad it is the Dylan from when he turned four when the cordial relationship between their parents was broken and Dylan's world jumped by a thousand pieces.

Ronan's own recollections prove that the thesis the documentary attempts to propose (carefully omitting the facts and misrepresenting them when necessary) is impossible.

For Dylan's change to be remembered by Ronan it had to occur at the time of his parents' breakup, not a year or two earlier.

Another important thing, it seems that the episode in which Dylan (and satchel) was supposed to have seen Woody Allen and Soon Yi naked in bed making love has disappeared from their memory. (the story here)
nadiemencionaalperro.blogspot.com/2018/09/dylan-…

There are many reasons to believe that neither Dylan nor Ronan experienced anything Dylan told the police in 1992, but if they did, then is obvious that it was impossible for Dylan to think for the first time "It is not just me". She knew it very well.

If Dylan saw Woody and Soon YI naked making love, she couldn't possibly be surprised six months later to know that Allen took naked photos of Soon Yi; if she did not see them making love something very serious happened in that house when Woody Allen was not there

Finally and sadly.
Apart from the analysis of the facts, there is a terrible conclusion: everything indicates that they have lied to Dylan for years and have made her feel that it is her fault that Allen was not in jail.

Dylan has a right to the truth.

Although Dylan had Monica Thompson as a nanny almost from birth and Kristi Groteke during the last year of their parents' relationship, neither of them is mentioned in the documentary in any way although, they would not only be perfect witnesses of what is described (...)

(...) they had the specific task of taking care of the kids. By avoiding mentioning them in the documentary, they even prevent the viewer from wondering, And what did the babysitters see? or, Did Mia Farrow warn the babysitters of the fears and worries she now relates?

The documentary not only does not provide any information that is contrary to its narrative, but it also hides that there are first-hand sources that could be consulted to contrast, verify, that narrative.

In addition, we know by Kristi Groteke that Woody was not there "every day before the kids woke up". When Woody Allen arrived in his Limousine the children were up and doing their daily activities. What Gilman says in the documentary is not true.

In fact, from what Kristi tells, it is clear that Woody Allen arrived in Connecticut in the afternoon, not in the morning.

Gilman's statement in the documentary is not true. She tries to create in the viewer the impression that Allen was obsessed with Dylan, but she is not telling the truth. And...what was Gilman doing at Mia Farrow's house every day before the children got up?
She was not there

Gilman used to go to the house in the afternoon and spending there the evening. She was not there in the morning when the kids wake up. Neither was Allen.
I am afraid it is the reliability that can be expected from Gilman's testimony and from the documentary in general.

Another interesting discrepancy. Mia Farrow states that the first time she told Dylan about Soon Yi was in the presence of the psychologist and memorizing the exact words that the psychologist had prepared.

However, that's not what Dylan remembers. There was only one "first time" that Mia Farrow told Dylan what was going on. Either it was with Dr. Schultz and memorizing what the Dr. thought was appropriate, or it was with Ronan and Mia Farrow saying what seemed appropriate to her.

The documentary misleadingly leads us to believe what Dr. Schultz had Mia Farrow memorize to break the news to Dylan is what Dylan recounts next.,It's false.The two versions do not match.Considering that Dr, Schultz could confirm one of the versions, only two possibilities left:

1/What Dylan remembers never happened.
2/ What Dylan remembers happened without Dr. Schultz's knowledge or control.
In any of the cases, the truth is hidden by the Farrows and the documentary makers help us not to notice that there is a hidden truth.

"Must we believe that Ronan noticed when he was 1 that his sister was talkative and noticed when he turned two that she was shy? The timeline is just impossible."

Another manipulation. Mia told Dr. Costes about it for the first time in 1991, not in 1990.
It was in 1991 that Dr. Coates said for the first time that the relationship was intense but not sexual.

The documentary attempts to convey the idea that Mia opposed the adoption because of Woody Allen's behavior with Dylan and that when Dr.Coates reassured her and Allen entered therapy,she finally agreed.But that narrative is seriously inaccurate because it omits a fundamental fact

In 1990 Mia Farrow redrafted her will so that in the event of her death, the care and custody of all her minor children would be left to Woody Allen.This fact, difficult to explain if the concerns that she narrates in the documentary existed, is totally omitted in the documentary

And even for those who know about the will, it would be explained because the therapist is supposed to have told her in 1990 that Woody Allen's behavior was not sexual. However it did not happen that way, Mia Farrow redrafted her will a year before speaking with the doctor

From what little we know of Dr. Coates' testimony, neither Allen's behavior was that serious, nor was Mia so concerned, nor did she speak to the Doctor at any time about many of the behaviors that she has discussed over the years.

It is the first time that this story has been told like this, it can be corroborated or proven false with the records of the trial, but it is hard to believe that a therapist asks a father to say in front of his 7-year-old daughter "never for a second was any of it sexual"