For years I’ve been fascinated and confused by the issue of what I call “state ontology.” How do nation states exist, how do they affect the existence of other beings, what is their fundamental role? And how do people perceive the state’s being, beyond political opinions?
The pandemic has reinvigorated this question and provided an enormous clue for how to think about it.
Epidemiology, vaccination, border control all seem to show the ontology of the state, although I don’t know what to read to clarify this intuition.
Probably Foucault on biopolitics is the thing to read? But I’m afraid of Foucault...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Meekaale Brockman

Meekaale Brockman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @meekaale

24 Feb
📝 Today I wrote about our Twitter community, its exodus from rationalism, and the Slate Star Codex rejection of virtue ethics.

roamresearch.com/#/app/mikaelog…
Image
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
@AskYatharth I wonder if “God” is a way of non-doing with larger scale intentions. Like, letting Jesus take the wheel. You don’t just trust your gut intuition, but attune to the wisdom of the universal conscience.
@AskYatharth In general I’m very curious how people manage to bring larger scale motivation, perception, direction into the present moment of non-coercive unfolding.
@AskYatharth Institutions are one way, I suppose: the social architecture aligns your daily actions with institutional frames. But that doesn’t seem sufficient.
Read 5 tweets
17 Feb
I would like to write something about how I’ve found God to be a very interesting and useful entity to relate to but it’s kind of weird. It started with a book recommended to me about a new metaphor for understanding Aquinas’s modification of Aristotelian virtue ethics
The metaphor is based on the concept “joint attention” from social cognition research which is like the main thing that autistic children won’t do with their parents, the meeting of minds that comes from playing together, looking together at something
As a parent I had never thought much about this phenomenon but immediately when I read about it, I realized how important it is, and I started paying attention to this daily thing of “seeing together” with my toddler son
Read 40 tweets
17 Feb
it seems like a mistake to group "virtue ethics" with theories like utilitarianism and then argue about which one is better

virtue ethics is the study of how excellence is conceived and taught within traditions & communities

it's not a procedure for making decisions
a virtue ethicist could for example take the rationalist effective altruism community as a case study and look at which goods it upholds, which virtues enable attainment of those goods, and how the whole thing functions in practice
that also means looking at how conflicts are negotiated within the community, and which virtues enable efficient and constructive negotiation, which blends into general virtues that apply to community as such
Read 16 tweets
17 Feb
hey @m_ashcroft how are you doing these days?

I feel parasocially invested in your well-being as a new free agent, maybe because your presence on the timeline was a joyful inspiration for me, and then I think your abrupt lifestyle change caused challenges to which I relate
and I know you're very interested in well-being and I'm kind of daytime soap operatically curious in your "progress" 😃

I'm also a free agent and I'm dealing with the whole motivation & self-coercion & bossing myself around thing
I'm doing writing coaching with @sashachapin which is really great, also just to have a curious clever chap with whom to talk about the thing I'm trying to write about

taking writing "seriously" like this, I'm also a bit stressed about performing and not wasting my time
Read 7 tweets
3 Jan
it seems like you can choose where to put the mystery

“how come minds arise from matter?”

“how come experience is structured in a lawful way that suggests an objective material reality?”

the only answer is meta-philosophical, we can’t know why the universe is lawful at all
like you definitely cannot ever disprove the possibility of some type of simulation hypothesis, or divine transcendental creation, etc

you can only take life as a given and continue to enact it the way you are without EVER finding ontological base truth
is all of experience some kind of demonic hallucination created by alien Lovecraftian superintelligence? MAYBE, YOLO
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!