Earlier this month, we wrote to the Rajasthan Govt bringing to its notice that internet shutdowns are being ordered by Divisional Commissioners who are not empowered to do so under the Telecom Suspension Rules 2017. 2/n
The State Level Review Committee is also not functioning properly and existing data suggests that it has only been reviewing around 25% of all internet shutdowns. 3/n
Proactive publication of internet shutdown orders as mandated by the SC in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India is absent as well. These legal orders must be published on official govt websites and also through print and electronic media. 4/n
In addition to fixing these problems, we have urged the Rajasthan Govt to commission an independent study to evaluate the effectiveness of internet shutdowns at preventing violence and examine less restrictive alternatives such as fact-checking or removing specific posts. 5/n
Internet shutdowns are a pan-India problem requiring sustained engagement with several state governments. Help us keep up this long term and resource intensive work by becoming an IFF member today! 6/n
🚨 Breaking: We are releasing a copy of the Draft IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, which seek to change the face of how digital media is governed in India.
Background: Section 79 of the IT Act provides a ‘safe harbour’ to intermediaries like social media companies who host user generated content. It exempts them from liability for the actions of their users, as long as they adhere to guidelines prescribed by the government.
2/n
The Government has now expanded the scope of the intermediary rules to also include news media and OTT platforms. This was first reported by the Hindustan Times. 3/n epaper.hindustantimes.com/Home/ShareArti…
Under MHA, Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre's program allows citizens to register as Unlawful Content Flaggers and report online content. This will help law enforcement identify, report and remove it.
It will be launched countrywide with test runs in J&K and Tripura.
2/n
Lateral surveillance is a practice where instead of a State surveilling citizens, we are incentivised to surveil each other. This will lead to a culture of suspicion, social distrust, and cyber vigilantism.
On Feb 1 ~250 Twitter accounts of news orgs, farmers groups, etc. were blocked in response to a legal request from MeitY. The rationale of provocative tweets about protests and a specific hashtag was not substantiated as such direction under Sec 69A has not been made public.
2/n
Reports claim that Twitter contested the order. While Twitter restored the blocked accounts after public outrage, concerns about secrecy, proportionality and arbitrariness were raised. On Feb 3 MeitY reportedly sent an order to Twitter warning it about this decision.
3/n
It cumulatively allots Rs. 68,487.7 crore to NDHM, Ministry of Electronics and IT, and Department of Telecom.
A 460% increase in total capital expenditure over Revised Estimates of 2020-21 is observed, but this is not significant in context of last year's Budget estimates.
2/n
MeitY witnesses a boost with Rs. 9,720.7 in allocations, largely due to the Digital India Program (L).
An increasing trend is seen in allocations towards innovation, with IT/ITeS industries and Centre for Development of Advanced Computing receiving boosts (R).
Reports suggest that a large number of Twitter accounts which were sharing information about the farmers' protests have been blocked by MeitY under the opaque Section 69A of the Information Technology Act. 1/n
Section 69A and the IT Blocking Rules prevent intermediaries like Twitter from disclosing any information about blocking of an account or tweet. 2/n
The confidentiality requirement present under Rule 16 of the IT Blocking Rules creates a bizarre situation where citizens have the right to challenge blocking of online content but they are unable to do so because they don't have access to these legal orders. 3/n