1. @RepJohnYarmuth, the powerful chairman of the House Budget Committee, has recently purchased several cannabis industry stocks while championing legalization legislation that would increase their value
6. I found the statement interesting, because Yarmuth seems to acknowledge that his interest in the stock is driven by a more favorable regulatory environment
But as a House leader, he has influence and insight what's going to happen moving forward
7. @CBHolman of @Public_Citizen told me that Yarmuth's patter of trading "certainly doesn't look good" and gives the impression that Yarmuth is "using his official office for personal gain."
2. The argument inside of Facebook is if they stopped pushing Shapiro into the feeds of people who didn't follow him, he would complain he was being "shadow-banned" when he saw his numbers drop
3. This isn't the first time Shapiro has gotten special treatment from Facebook. When I caught the Daily Wire blatantly violating Facebook's rules by paying scummy pages for promotion, Facebook declined to sanction the Daily Wire
Cruz’s kids are ten and older, unclear why they needed to travel with more than one adult. And if they do, how are they managing the trip back? The whole thing makes no sense.
This is floating around but I haven’t seen it verified. But Cruz has put his plans to return at issue. He can prove his version — that he always intended to return the next day — is true.
1. Everyone should know about what @kroger, the nation's largest supermarket chain, is doing to make sure their frontline employees don't make a few extra bucks an hour
This is a company which had $3 BILLION in profit in the first 3 quarters of 2020
1. So Facebook banned all Australian news sources from its platform because of PROPOSED legislation that would require Facebook to negotiate compensation for Australian media outlets
It's not even a law yet.
That's important.
2. Facebook's dramatic action to cut off news to Australians (and others) in the middle of a pandemic isn't a RESPONSE to a law.
There is no law passed yet.
It's an attempt to BULLY the Australian government into not passing the law.
3. Facebook's actions today can best be understood as an aggressive lobbying effort.
It's showing Australian government its willing to follow through with the ban.
Tough to square this bare-knuckled approach with the company's supposed commitment to free speech.