We came into possession of audio from a Clubhouse Q&A featuring @marclamonthill. It was recorded on 02/17. The topic was Hill’s book “Except for Palestine.”
The recorded discussion shows signs of a growing totalitarian and antisemitic political movement:
Audio below:
.@marclamonthill believes his revisionist antizionism should be a requirement of anyone that wants to join the movement. He proposes using Israel as a litmus test; antisemitism would be an inevitably for such a movement:
@lawJAB discusses “the power”, real or perceived, of those who seek “to colonize that land”. Her rhetoric parallels racist tales about imaginary Jewish cabals. Myths and conspiracy theories about Jewish power are the basis for antisemitic movements:
This questioner believes that Jews weaponize antisemitism, because while it’s easy to view one’s group as a savior or a victim, it’s difficult to admit one’s group is an oppressor (Jews). She claims most Jews don’t know what they’re doing when they “weaponize” antisemitism:
.@marclamonthill insists Israel must be viewed as an enemy of “anti-racists”, since, he claims, Israel doesn’t view non-whites or non-Jews as human beings. He claims Ethiopian Jews are treated as subhuman due to the racist nature of Zionism. This is an antisemitic lie:
.@marclamonthill believes solidarity between American Blacks and American Arabs would help his progressive movement. Solidarity and understanding is always a positive, but what then of American Jews?
.@lsarsour discusses her efforts to normalize antizionism/antisemitism, and reveals that multiple Sanders’ delegates were openly antizionist and disagreed with Sanders on Israel. Sanders nominally supports the existence of Israel. Did Sanders know what he was empowering?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh