"Maybe my life, for months, is just going to be about fixing this, now."
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon Last week, my computer did slow to a crawl, and I started closing windows with my tab manager, which deleted the twitter thread that I had just spent an hour on (the posting of which was the point of closing all the windows).
Which was notable, because "angry at electronics" is a classic trope, but I had not been that angry in years, and I think never at electronics?
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon And even there, I was angry at my tab manager, not myself. Though part of the anger was how irrevocable it was. Like, I would start looking for "how do I fix this" and bump into "You can't. There's nothing you can do", and the anger would roar up in me again.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon (Really, scenarios in which you accidentally, permanently, delete a whole thing, that you've been working on for hours, are terrible.)
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon Sometime you have a short period of time (like a meeting) where you know a huge amount is hinging on your performance.
But there, I would just "man up" / "show up" and do the thing as best I can.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon The worse thing is when I can choose the time when I'm going to go for the thing, because then I'm tempted to procrastinate on it indefinitely.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon I got some taste of this last year because I was struggling to move the needle on my typing accuracy, which proved extremely resilient to my best efforts, despite the fact that I type much slower than my peers.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon Typically, I take the frustration as a trigger to go meta and get strategic, but if I have been doing that, and nothing is working, it's really frustrating, and eventually, despair-provoking.
(Which is kind of interesting because I was stridently rejecting the Christian-Aristotelian teleological morality of some of my teachers.)
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon And also because I was aiming to become powerful, and if I was going to have power over the world, I needed to first and foremost have power over myself.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon And I also thought that it was "cheating" (or something) to use any of the psychological methods I was at least a little familiar with at the time.
I needed to do it by pure self-discipline.
(Which, in case you haven't heard, is a terrible strategy for behavior change.)
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon So I would go in wave of committing not to masturbate, and go for a few weeks. And then having niggling temptation, I would rationalizing "just a little". And I would play in that rationalization until, I ejaculated, at which point I would feel disgusted with myself.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon I would feel weak and pathetic, and depressed. I would wallow in that for a few days, probably masturbating a few more times, because, fuck it, I wasn't worth any of the things that I was aiming for (and because no one had told me that I could NOT fail with abandon.)
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon But eventually, I would pull myself out of that funk and set my eyes on a higher start again, and recommit to not masturbating, to that not being a thing that I did.
And then I would keep that up for weeks or maybe a month, before the cycle would repeat again.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon (Oh. I think part of the rationale for not masturbating was also wrapped up in my relationship to the woman-who-wasn't-yet-my-wife who I was trying to draw into my life with magick / the law of attraction.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon Probably there was some dynamic of my masturbating made me unworthy of her? I don't remember specifically, but probably something like that.)
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon Anyway, the low points related to masturbation, did have the flavor that I attribute to "negative self talk." A judgement of myself was wrapped up in the behavior, not just strategy or course-correction.
@uncatherio@diviacaroline@AnnaWSalamon (Also, for posterity, I fucked up a little bit, and there are three places in this thread where I "branched" the thread, and if you're just scrolling through you'll miss those ones.
In particular his analogy of a calculator (for a computational view of the self) is great.
"The point is to realize that both The Physics Explanation and The Math Explanation are true, and in _fact the entire purpose of the calculator is to make them coincide_."
This points directly at the source of the horror that I've expressed in the other thread.
Being physically implemented, all change has to be physically implemented.
But some change is the result of the system taking inputs, responding to them, reflecting on itself, and changing the way that it operates, often it quite radical ways.
Does anyone else find being an embedded / naturalistic agent disturbing?
Like, I could be injected with a chemical that would cause my cells to make new proteins, which could alter my brain.
It could change the algorithm that this body is running.
Which, from a computational theory of identity, is to say that you could inject me with a chemical that would delete ME, and replace me with someone else.
That's horrifying. It feels like one of the things that "shouldn't be allowed".