There are at least 3 types of explanation for what's occurring in various southeast Asian countries:
1) insufficient testing that misses many infections and/or misses many COVID-19 deaths 2) lower number of infections 3) lower proportion of infected people die of COVID-19
3/E
For explanation 1:
It's unlikely their testing misses more deaths, since their excess deaths don't outpace their reported COVID-19 deaths more than in many 'western' countries.
Insufficient PCR testing, or antigen testing, early on might still miss past infections. Antibody testing addresses that; this will be discussed more a bit later.
For explanation #3:
IFR (infection fatality rate) is the proportion of SARS-CoV-2-infected people who die of COVID-19. So explanation #3 states IFR is lower in southeast Asian nations.
Yet South Korea's IFR is comparable to western nations in spring/summer, regardless of whether one uses antibody testing or PCR-based modeling to estimate the number of infections.
That leaves explanation #2:
As per part 4/E, antibody testing on representative samples allows one to determine the number of infected people, without the limitations of PCR + antigen testing from explanation #1
Western nations had much higher infection rates, with their hardest-hit regions often having rates 1 or 2 orders of magnitude more than in the three southeast Asian nations noted before
Many of those offering these alternative explanations do so for ideological reasons and/or in bad faith, because they want to avoid an obvious answer:
Policies + behaviors in southeast Asia limited infections
20:42 - 25:52 :
18/E
So instead of making excuses about how southeast Asian nations have special exposure to other coronaviruses, or better immune systems, or..., we in western nations should own up to the reality that their policies + practices worked.
Further context on why prior infection with other coronaviruses does not adequately explain low COVID-19 deaths per capita in southeast Asian countries, especially in light of low seroprevalence:
Below John Ioannidis defends a failed version of explanation #3 in February 2021. He under-estimated IFR in southeast Asia, as covered in parts 8/E + 9/E, along with other threads.
Ioannidis, March 2021:
"I'm not talking about [New Zealand, Vietnam, Taiwan] that did a wonderful job and did exactly what I was saying a year ago. Test, test, test. That's what the WHO was saying. And then isolate, then contact trace"
31:35 - 31:47
26/E
Basic summary of the thread:
Southeast Asian countries successfully limited COVID-19 deaths predominately by pursuing policies + behaviors that prevented infections.
It's not a matter of them having better immune systems, special pre-exposure to other viruses, etc.
27/E
Based on this thread, one would predict that Malaysia's NHMS results (likely to be released in May/June) would show <2% of people infected, with an IFR of ≥0.4%.
@luckytran In which Bhattacharya does the intellectual equivalent of claiming vaccine denialists are being unfairly persecuted because Andrew Wakefield's blog told him so
"What they're doing is focused protection, and you can see the result. The infection rates are going up in Sweden, but the death rates are not." edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/vi…