Atomsk's Sanakan Profile picture
Feb 24, 2021 27 tweets 25 min read Read on X
1/E

Various southeast Asian nations suffered relatively few COVID-19 deaths per capita, especially in comparison to many "western" nations.

There's been a lot of speculation on why this is.
So this thread will examine some possible explanations.

archive.is/FkAho Image
2/E

There are at least 3 types of explanation for what's occurring in various southeast Asian countries:

1) insufficient testing that misses many infections and/or misses many COVID-19 deaths
2) lower number of infections
3) lower proportion of infected people die of COVID-19
3/E

For explanation 1:
It's unlikely their testing misses more deaths, since their excess deaths don't outpace their reported COVID-19 deaths more than in many 'western' countries.

nytimes.com/interactive/20…
bbc.com/news/world-530…
economist.com/graphic-detail…

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… ImageImageImageImage
4/E

Insufficient PCR testing, or antigen testing, early on might still miss past infections. Antibody testing addresses that; this will be discussed more a bit later.



archive.is/sjUkT Image
5/E

For explanation #3:
IFR (infection fatality rate) is the proportion of SARS-CoV-2-infected people who die of COVID-19. So explanation #3 states IFR is lower in southeast Asian nations.

Some proposed reasons for why this could be:

Image
6/E

The co-morbidities explanation seems less plausible, since IFR is driven more by age and sex than by co-morbidities.

IFR increases with age, as do co-morbidities, while the rate of various co-morbidities differs by sex.

link.springer.com/article/10.100… Image
7/E

South Korea + Japan are useful test cases here, since they have relatively old populations with less obesity than in many "western" nations.

So explanation #3 would predict those 2 nations to have lower IFRs.

populationpyramid.net/world/2019/

ourworldindata.org/obesity Image
8/E

Yet South Korea's IFR is comparable to western nations in spring/summer, regardless of whether one uses antibody testing or PCR-based modeling to estimate the number of infections.

[~0.6% August IFR: arxiv.org/pdf/2101.11991…]


link.springer.com/article/10.100… Image
9/E

Japan's IFR is on the higher-end of what's seen in western nations.
[]


[with: wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27…]

And China's IFR is comparable to that of western nations.

thelancet.com/journals/lanmi…
[with: thelancet.com/journals/lanwp…] Image
10/E

So explanation #3 is likely false.

That leaves explanation #2:
As per part 4/E, antibody testing on representative samples allows one to determine the number of infected people, without the limitations of PCR + antigen testing from explanation #1

12/E

Low antibody-based infection rates (i.e. seroprevalence) continued into autumn 2020 in Japan, as per 11/E, + in South Korea:
arxiv.org/abs/2101.11991

China's seroprevalence was highest in Wuhan in spring, and <1% elsewhere:

clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-…

thelancet.com/journals/lanwp… Image
13/E

Western nations had much higher infection rates, with their hardest-hit regions often having rates 1 or 2 orders of magnitude more than in the three southeast Asian nations noted before

istat.it/it/files//2020…

[mscbs.gob.es/gabinetePrensa…]
portalcne.isciii.es/enecovid19/inf… Image
15/E

It's unlikely that prior infection with other coronaviruses explains this (see part 5/E), since:

- innate immunity does not improve substantially
- T cells do not primarily limit infections, beyond impacting on B cells



Image
16/E

Similarly, this likely is not explained by cross-reactive B cells, plasma cells, and/or antibodies from prior infection with other coronaviruses.




nature.com/articles/s4159…
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

medrxiv.org/content/10.110… Image
17/E

Many of those offering these alternative explanations do so for ideological reasons and/or in bad faith, because they want to avoid an obvious answer:

Policies + behaviors in southeast Asia limited infections

20:42 - 25:52 :
18/E

So instead of making excuses about how southeast Asian nations have special exposure to other coronaviruses, or better immune systems, or..., we in western nations should own up to the reality that their policies + practices worked.

Deal with it.🤷‍♂️

Image
19/E

And h/t to @KawasakiKR11 for help in finding seroprevalence studies for Japan in part 11/E, since I only read and write in English.

22/E

Further context on why prior infection with other coronaviruses does not adequately explain low COVID-19 deaths per capita in southeast Asian countries, especially in light of low seroprevalence:




Image
23/E

Below John Ioannidis defends a failed version of explanation #3 in February 2021. He under-estimated IFR in southeast Asia, as covered in parts 8/E + 9/E, along with other threads.




3:03 and 16:05 :
Image
24/E

Re: "Ioannidis defends a failed version of explanation #3 [...]. He under-estimated IFR in southeast Asia"

Update on Asian seroprevalence studies:
thelancet.com/journals/lance…
mhlw.go.jp/content/000761…


He's still doing it:
Image
25/E

Ioannidis, March 2021:
"I'm not talking about [New Zealand, Vietnam, Taiwan] that did a wonderful job and did exactly what I was saying a year ago. Test, test, test. That's what the WHO was saying. And then isolate, then contact trace"

31:35 - 31:47
26/E

Basic summary of the thread:

Southeast Asian countries successfully limited COVID-19 deaths predominately by pursuing policies + behaviors that prevented infections.
It's not a matter of them having better immune systems, special pre-exposure to other viruses, etc.
27/E

Based on this thread, one would predict that Malaysia's NHMS results (likely to be released in May/June) would show <2% of people infected, with an IFR of ≥0.4%.

iku.moh.gov.my/nhms


ourworldindata.org/explorers/coro… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Atomsk's Sanakan

Atomsk's Sanakan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AtomsksSanakan

Dec 9
@luckytran Bhattacharya' NIH nomination for 2025 is reminiscent of Scott Pruitt's EPA nomination for 2017:

Position a contrarian ideologue whose views contradict published evidence + expert assessments.

x.com/_johnbye/statu…
x.com/pjavidan/statu…

cnbc.com/2017/03/09/sco… Image
@luckytran In which Bhattacharya does the intellectual equivalent of claiming vaccine denialists are being unfairly persecuted because Andrew Wakefield's blog told him so

🤢

x.com/AlastairMcA30/…

x.com/AliNeitzelMD/s…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
@luckytran x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

Bhattacharya, November 2020:

"What they're doing is focused protection, and you can see the result. The infection rates are going up in Sweden, but the death rates are not."
edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/vi…

ourworldindata.org/explorers/covi… Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 18
@luckytran No, 'focused protection' did not lead to herd immunity within 6 months in Florida.

"Florida, which adopted a focused-protection approach"
spiked-online.com/2021/08/02/the…

x.com/GidMK/status/1…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

gbdeclaration.org/frequently-ask… Image
@luckytran When your main non-lockdown example... has a lockdown.

"announced a ban on public events of more than eight people"
web.archive.org/web/2020120111…

"upper secondary schools are again closing"
thelocal.se/20201203/swede…

x.com/DrKatrin_Rabie…

Bhattacharya:
gbdeclaration.org/frequently-ask… Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 17
@luckytran Re: "Bhattacharya has spread disinformation on COVID"

You may want to support this claim, if you haven't already.

There are plenty of examples of him spreading misinformation.

For instance: on masking

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/RobertoCast212…

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap… Image
@luckytran Promoting obvious disinformation about China's COVID-19 policy.

x.com/ResidingCynic/…
x.com/doritmi/status…

web.archive.org/web/2022010218… Image
@luckytran Saying a majority of Indians had "natural immunity" when the real number was ~25%, weeks before India suffered a large COVID-19 wave

x.com/GYamey/status/…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
Read 28 tweets
Feb 23
71/J

I recently got a copy of Dr. Judith Curry's book without buying it myself.

Looking over it confirmed to me that it's largely misinformation.

I'll illustrate that by assessing its claims on COVID-19.

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

"11.3.1 COVID-19"
amazon.com/Climate-Uncert… Image
72/J

To reiterate: Curry draws parallels between COVID-19 + climate change.

But some of the sources she cites suggest an ideologically convenient narrative misinformed her.

That becomes clearer when assessing her claims.

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
73/J

No mention of the misinformation she + other contrarians promoted, and which conflicted with knowledge advances by experts.

(8/J - 12/J, 32J - 36/J, 44/J, 45/J, 63/J, etc.)

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
Read 47 tweets
Feb 17
1/J

Dr. Judith Curry recommends people read at least the 45-page preview of her new book.

I did.

It's bad enough I wouldn't recommend buying the book.
It's largely contrarian conspiracist misinformation.




amazon.com/Climate-Uncert…
Image
Read 72 tweets
Aug 30, 2023
PapersOfTheDay

"Executive Summary to the Royal Society report “COVID-19: examining the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions”"


"Effectiveness of face masks for reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: [...]"
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
Jefferson + Heneghan don't like the papers.

Makes sense they wouldn't given their track record, especially Jefferson on the Cochrane mask review he led.







brownstone.org/articles/royal…



cochrane.org/news/statement…
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(