I had the privilege of talking about Jesus and John Wayne with @aaronieq@cb_johns@aprilldiaz and Jackie Johns. I do a lot of podcasts and I love them all, but this one felt different. It went kind of deep. Take a listen. Also, as a historian, context is always relevant... 1/8
So I'll note that when we recorded this episode, I was unaware that @sniequist was about to break her silence and apologize publicly for her silence in light of revelations of her dad's (Bill Hybels) abusive behavior. Here's more on that: religionnews.com/2021/02/22/aut… 2/8
This is a lot to process, so a couple thoughts. First, as a historian I am unaccustomed to writing histories in which principal actors are still among us. Even stranger is having my own book become part of the story I've traced, in its own way. I'll say more on that another time
But I'll add that I've had many conversations with readers of J&JW who acknowledge their complicity in the story I tell. Some minor figures, others of greater prominence. I am often asked "What next?" I'm better at examining the past than offering advice in the present, but... 4/
...here's what I say. Make amends if possible with those you've harmed. (What is critical here is that the experiences and voices of victims/survivors are always centered.) 5/8
Think of those you've actively excluded, and consider what it looks like to make amends in those cases. Then, think of those you've never even considered including--because of racial, theological, political, or other boundaries. 6/8
Seek them out, and listen. Learn from them. And maybe then work to lead in a different direction. Or, maybe discover that it's not your job to lead. Maybe instead find where the faith is flourishing, and follow. 7/8
And let me add that as unsettling as it is for me at times, it is an immense privilege, as a historian, to encounter such meaningful, personal, and often painful engagement with my book. It is a responsibility that I don't take lightly. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We're in new territory now with J&JW, with reviews of reviews appearing. Which is kind of fun, especially when penned by someone like @JohnInazu. I welcome his expert perspective on one of the questions that troubled me while writing: connections between the evangelical...
...presence at the AFAcademy. It was striking to me & I long pondered what to do with the fact that (contested) concerns over the (contested) ev presence at the Academy covered the same period as sexual assault scandals there. I did not have evidence proving causal connections...
...and yet I thought it important to note the overlap. I'm glad @JohnInazu cited my actual words, where I say that it seemed like these are 2 distinct issues, but then yes, I do suggest that they "might not be entirely disconnected." (Note the careful wording.)
So this caught my attn even before I realized Jesus and John Wayne was part of this discussion. Here's Newsmax talking about @DavidAFrench 's interview with Vox's @seanilling on how Trump was a catastrophe for Am Christians. I'll get to Rachel Hamm in a minute, but first...
I'm a big fan of French & his resistance, but I want to push his analysis further. Why Trump? It's not just that white evs are Repubs, but white evs helped shape the Repub party into what it is. This isn't about being coopted. It's affinities & alliances. vox.com/22188646/trump…
Alternative information is a huge thing. But here too it's not just that evs watch Fox and listen to talk radio. Conservative evs contribute to Fox and talk radio & conservative media cater to evs. Meanwhile Chr media generate & amplify the very same perspectives. It's symbiotic.
A perceptive review that considers J&JW's reception: "Like preachers, doctrines, politicians & positions, books & authors can become identity markers for subcultures, movements, and communities. Battleground books become symbols of community signaling." 1/ faithliterally.com/p/jesus-and-jo…
Napier suggests that J&JW is poised to become a symbol for camp categorization btw progressives and conservatives. I know what he means, and I've watched this begin to play out with fascination. But I'd dispute the categories "progressive" and "conservative." 2/6
What I see are conservatives embracing J&JW, at least if the word still means anything other than "white nationalist Trump-supporter." Conservative white evangelicals who look at J&JW and say "this is not what I believe" are redrawing the boundaries... 3/6
Apologies for the tardiness (my pesky day job interferes with my Twitter habit from time to time), but before the week is out I wanted to return @mereorthodoxy's absolutely fascinating (to me!) J&JW symposium. And so, a Friday night thread:
First, this nuanced review by @klh_sanders, which is familiar to me because, of all of the reviews I've seen of J&JW, this one most resembles the critics' voices that I conversed w/ in my head as I wrote J&JW. I considered these objections as I wrote, I weighed the evidence...
...and I crafted my narrative. So...I don't think my treatment of "outliers as evidence" is quite as reckless as Sanders suggests. I tried to take pains to differentiate even as I identified affinities. And many evs are variously shaped by mainstream and "extreme" influences.
A poignant reflection written by my friend, Barbara Carvill, professor emerita at Calvin University. She was baptized into the Germain Christian church under the Third Reich, by a pastor who preached antisemitism, and... 1/4
...making “Jesus into a Germanic heroic warrior.” The pastor congratulated her parents for producing another child for the Lebenskampf, for the German warrior nation. Her father was commended for his loyalty and obedience.... 2/4
Her mother was reminded of her duty to sacrifice herself for her children. They were to cultivate loyalty & obedience in Barbara, too, who was “consecrated to live and serve the German Volk,” filled with Christ’s power. 3/4
I've been following the horrifying story of the killing of Casey Goodson Jr by Baptist pastor/sheriff's deputy Jason Meade, a proponent of preemptive violence as "righteous release." Meade's actions & views seem extreme, but mainstream white evangelicalism isn't that far away. 1/
The idea that God gives righteous (masculine) protectors the authority to use violence to bring order is pervasive within conservative white evangelicalism, going back to the (highly racialized) law & order politics of the sixties. (This is the John Wayne part of Jesus & JW.) 2/
And the idea that "superior violence" is necessary is common w/in post-9/11 evangelicalism. My ch. on anti-Islamic rhetoric ("Why We Want to Kill You") shows how this works even (esp.) when based on fabricated threats. Also see white ev support for preemptive war & torture. 3/