1) E.V.R wasn't Velalar. 2) There's a fundamental problem with generalizing & pinning the blame on 1 cαstε for the actions of converts to a different ideology. I DO NOT support this notion. If this were a notion to be supported, as the person below is doing,
(/1)
People would have to start holding 1) JΔts accountable for KhΔlistΑnism, 2) V1's for actions of Nehπu & EMS. Namboodiπipad 3) Cαstεs with converts to Xtiαηity or 'zlΔm(All castes?)
& so on, which is obv a stμpid notion! We shouldn't be blamed for actions of coηvεrts!
(/2)
Respecting the differences b/w the Jαatis, & still bonding together against the common eηεmy,i.e the different ideologies: C0mmiε, 'xtianity, 'zlam, Dπaνidiαηism, should be the goal. Not furthering differences! There are numerous people from all cαstεs who have fought FOR Dharmα,
& Numerous ppl from ALL cαstεs who have fought AGAINST Dharma. This is fact. And to pin the blame for 1 ideology on 1 Hindu Jaati, which does have members who have contributed A LOT to Dharma in Past & Present, is foolishness.This applies to all the cαstε fights I've seen so far
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
*The tale of Tiruchendur Murugan*
Tirumalai (1623-1659 A.D.) of Madura Nayak dynasty, eager to have foreign trade relations,concluded a treaty with the Portuguese for pearls in 1639 A.D. The pearl fishery which employed the Paravas of the coast, brought them enormous wealth.
(/1)
A treaty with the Dutch was concluded in 1646 by terms of which they were allowed to build a fort at Kayalpattanam. This brought them into conflict with the Portuguese. They seized a Dutch boat laden with goods & drove the Dutch out of their fort & destroyed it.
(/2)
The Dutch Governor came to the mainland in 10 boats, landed at Manappar, seized the Portuguese Church at Virarampattanam, occupied the Temple at Tiruchendur, & fortified the latter with guns & seized the gold. The locals made several futile attempts to regain the temple.
(/3)
RT @TIinExile ji:
It is often claimed that Pre Modern Hindu India was a misogynist world where women were not allowed to own property. A glance at contemporary inscriptions proves otherwise. From the property transactions, 48% of land owners & sellers were women in Kumbhakonam,TN
In the above table Chola Period 1 belongs to the period of Vijayalaya & early cholas (A.D 850-985)
Period 2 marks the height of Chola ascendancy under Rajaraja & Rajendra Chola (A.D 985-1070)
Thanjavur was the core area of Cholas.
Clearly, the % was highest during their peak
(/2)
Well, This period was Peak Brahmanism under Cholas. The beautiful religion of Brahmanism held sway all over Tamilakam!
(/3)
<Thread exposing the Handle @nitayuvani on twitter>
On Instagram she is @/manavastra
Her allegations, I quote- 1) He "has issues with my janeu" 2) He is "main leader in this attack on my character" 3) He is "instigating people to abuse me"
I will expose these fake allegations, and also expose her abuses and slander.
1) My stance on Janeu for Women-
I told her, & I quote- "You can wear whatever you want, I am no one to advise". And I quote TrueIndology. Yet she still says I have issues with her Janeu.