From an #LP perspective, we’ve seen both deliver strong (e.g., 3x net) results. The nuances (for us) live in the fund’s size and the quality of deal flow a fund is seeing.
We also believe that a fund’s size highly informs/directs its investment strategy. For example, smaller fund size (e.g., sub $40m) is much more conducive to a higher # of companies/lower ownership strategy than even a $60m size fund.
And as both @dunkhippo33 and @fintechjunkie point out - even in a sub $50m fund, getting to a 3x net - a fund needs multiple 🦄 exits or a decacorn. No easy task!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lots of ink is spilled parsing differences b/w pre-seed vs seed vs early stage (etc…) investing. But some truths hold across all stages of venture investing! @alexiskold digs in here: startuphacks.vc/blog/7-truths-…#OpenLP
Truth 1. Venture outcomes are driven by a power law.
Power law is an immutable law of the universe, and that extends to #VC too. Most startups fail, but the biggest winners, when they happen, tend to be huge.
VC’s NEED 🦄’s (and decacorns!) to succeed.
Truth 2. Your Fund Size is Your Strategy
A fund's portfolio construction will depend on how much capital is under management.
This is why funds often specialize at a specific stage of investing (ie. <$50M fund = pre-seed/seed, $150-$300M fund = seed/series A, etc...).