2/The minimum wage debate has brought attention to the fact that the minimum wage that's appropriate for small-town Oklahoma isn't the same as the minimum wage that's appropriate for New York City.
3/One idea is to tie minimum wage increases to changes in PRODUCTIVITY, since many people believe that productivity differences are the source of local cost and wage differences, and because making wage=productivity feels fair.
But there are big problems with that approach.
4/A second idea is to tie minimum wage increases to INFLATION. That's better, but because inflation doesn't always reflect the cost of what low-income people buy, it could end up not being a living wage.
5/A third idea -- and the one Biden has proposed -- is to tie minimum wage increases to changes in MEDIAN LOCAL WAGES. That will be a fine approach, since we have evidence that minimum wages at 60% of local median wages are pretty safe.
But can we do even better?
6/If we want to make sure minimum wage is a living wage, we could tie minimum wage increases to the local rent.
Shelter is the biggest single spending item for poor people, absorbing over a quarter of what they spend!
7/What's more, shelter -- along with food -- is the most essential of all goods. We'd like to make sure minimum wage covers not just what poor people DO buy, but what they absolutely NEED to buy.
8/But tying minimum wage increases to local rent increases could have another beneficial effect -- it could provide an incentive for cities to build more housing!!
9/Many cities have a rent crisis. And as things stand, there's not much that the federal government can do to fight local NIMBYs and incentivize cities to build more housing.
10/But if we tied minimum wage increases to local rent, then businesses would immediately be turned into a lobby against NIMBYs!
11/Now, there are at least two big challenges for this sort of policy that I can see.
First, we don't want poor people to get swamped by the cost of other essentials like food, so we can include that in the "essentials" index too. Rent will still be the biggest item.
12/A second problem is to determine *which rents* to index too. You want to index to the rents low-income people actually pay! There are various schemes for doing this:
2/"Strong dollar" is actually a misnomer, since it actually makes U.S. exporters weaker. The trade deficit, which has returned to historic highs, is almost certainly a reason people are worrying that the dollar is too uncompetitive.
3/Janet Yellen has wisely refused to back a "strong dollar" policy (Mnuchin sort of did the same, but it was hard to tell).
I'm afraid that the "believe the experts" people are going to be super strident about telling people that being vaccinated doesn't change anything (which is wrong), and as a result the "don't believe the experts" people are going to think the vaccines are worthless.
The other day I had someone scold me for saying "vaccines work", saying actually it's VACCINATION that works.
That's nuts of course. VACCINES WORK.
Of course these are the same people who were yelling at us not to wear cloth masks in April 2020, because there was "no evidence that masks work" (wrong!), and wearing a cloth mask might motivate some stranger to use an N95 that could have gone to a hospital.
Clubhouse has unbundled the "discussion" part of Twitter from the "news" part. That's good. People who just want to talk now have a place to talk without being subject to constant dunking, reply-guying, etc.
Substack, meanwhile, has unbundled the "long-form writing" part of Twitter. It's just a better place to lay out your thoughts. Of course other blogging services like Medium help with this too. But Substack's email list integration helps broadcast to a large-ish audience.
The smallish number of people who denounce Clubhouse and Substack are going to fail. Their denunciations might keep a few people off the platforms for a while, but eventually people will realize these are good platforms, and will simply migrate there.