Thread by @end_2party_rule

@naomirwolf pcr ‘testing’ issues finally hitting mainstream. it only took a year. here’s the main issue with pcr and ‘testing’ healthy ppl.
a thread...

@naomirwolf 2/ when you get a strep test, it is a culture test. if the live virus is there in any substantive way, it will grow in the lab after your swab. with pcr, they are just searching for strands at insanely high magnification.

@naomirwolf 3/ even the inventor of the pcr test, kary mullis, loathed the use of pcr as a ‘test.’ you can most always find endemic virus that you are looking for, dead nucleotides or alive, contagious or not.

@naomirwolf 4/ imagine schools/work said you need to take a strep pcr test for in-person school or work to resume. hundreds of millions of people in the US alone would ‘test’ positive for strep in a pcr test if done today. the problem is, having strep in you doesn’t mean you have strep.

@naomirwolf 5/ there is a very good chance you are carrying weak or dead pieces of the virus if you ‘test’ positive, and that doesn’t warrant a diagnosis and doesn’t indicate contagiousness.

@naomirwolf 6/ i know this is old news, but i think the strep comparison helps people understand how bogus this pcr ‘testing’ is as a diagnostic tool, a trigger for quarantines, and general case count inflation. #covidhysteria

@naomirwolf 7/ kary mullis himself. worth 2 hours to watch. parallels to today are uncanny. think of him and his skepticism and lifestyle what you will, he understood the issues of science being reduced to convenient & profitable correlation-is-causality bunk.

@naomirwolf @threadreaderapp unroll