1/9

Very interesting article. It seems pretty clear that the point of massively expanding China’s transportation infrastructure over the next 15 years has more to do with the goal of doubling reported GDP over the period than with improving the...

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/9

economic efficiency of Chinese transportation. China probably already has the best transportation network in the world for its level of development, and almost certainly a more expensive transportation network than is productively justified.
3/9

In that case there are at least three important concerns with this strategy. The first and most obvious is that the doubling of GDP will necessarily involve overstating the comparable value of GDP, so that it becomes a meaningless proxy: GDP may double temporarily, but...
4/9

the economic value of goods and service produced by the economy won’t.

A second – less obvious but more dangerous – problem is the amount of pro-cyclicality this type of investment tends to embed in the real economy. The faster the real, underlying economy...
5/9

grows, the more upward pressure this infrastructure spending puts on growth, but of course the slower it grows, the greater the downward pressure. And we know from the historical precedents that this pro-cyclicality works more powerfully on the way down than on the way up.
6/9

Finally, to the extent that the cost of building the transportation network exceeds the real economic benefits to the Chinese economy, the difference must be paid for explicitly or implicitly by transfers from another sector of the economy. If the household sector ends...
7/9

up effectively subsidizing the cost, as is most likely, this makes it more difficult than ever for domestic Chinese demand to rebalance towards consumption, which puts further downward pressure on China’s contribution to global demand and greater strains on the...
8/9

global trading regime. This also makes the Chinese economy more vulnerable to trade pressure from the US and the world.

Of course if China’s infrastructure spending convinces the US to improve its own transportation infrastructure significantly, as it should, this will...
9/9

be very positive for US growth and positive for global growth, and may even reduce the US trade pressure on China.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

26 Feb
1/7

While it is definitely a good idea to come up with innovative ways to fund needed infrastructure, government funding really isn’t an issue for self-liquidating projects. Consider China’s case. Chinese debt has been rising extremely rapidly since...

ft.com/content/16885b…
2/7

the late 1980s, but no one noticed until roughly two decades later.

Why? Because until then China was severely underinvested in infrastructure and manufacturing capacity, and so while nominal debt rose rapidly, its contribution to real GDP rose just as rapidly. It was...
3/7

only once debt was used to fund investment whose cost exceeded its contribution to the real economy that China’s debt burden began to rise, after which of course additional debt can only be serviced by transfers, and not just by increases in real debt-servicing capacity.
Read 7 tweets
24 Feb
1/11

This article on the the population aspect of Guangdong's 2020-35 plan is very interesting. Even if Guangdong is successful in growing its population by the proposed 0.8% a year between now and 2035, at a time when China's population will...

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/11

grow annually on average by only 0.1% and, more importantly, its working-age population will contract by 0.5% a year, Guangdong's success can only come at the expense of China's poorer provinces.

This isn't necessarily bad. In principle China should benefit overall...
3/11

from greater labor mobility as workers move from slower-growing provinces to faster-growing ones (and Guangdong will not be the only wealthy province to try do this) but the amount by which it improves depends partly on the extent to which the hukou system is modified.
Read 11 tweets
23 Feb
1/6

The China-Latin America Finance Database (C-LAFD) has some useful data showing the total number, volume and kinds of loans from Chinese policy banks to Latin American and Caribbean governments and state-owned enterprises. Although this doesn't...

thedialogue.org/map_list/
2/6

cover all Chinese investment in the region, it is probably a decent proxy: one of my former students covering Latin America at a policy bank told me that other Chinese investors pretty much watch what the policy banks do to get their cues on whether and how much to invest.
3/6

I put together this simple graph based on the C-LAFD data. It shows that total lending peaked out in 2010, partly on the back of a major iron-ore deal with Venezuela. Within 2-3 years, however, it was clear that this deal was running into serious problems, but high levels...
Read 6 tweets
21 Feb
1/6

Although obviously each case must be evaluated separately, I broadly agree with @D_Brautigam's conclusion. While I have no doubt that China (like other countries) had planned to use development lending for geo-political advantage, I'd argue that...

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
2/6

Chinese lending to developing countries is characterized more by inexperience – veering at times towards incompetence – than it is by some master plan of debt-trap diplomacy.

Certainly the case I know best, that of Venezuela, is a story in which Beijing constantly...
3/6

over-estimated debt-servicing capacity (and willingness) and underestimated the risks that more experienced creditors were avoiding, and as a result is looking at pretty sizable losses that aren't even being compensated for by goodwill. If Beijing could turn back the...
Read 6 tweets
21 Feb
1/5

Copper futures are up, presumably on confidence in a domestic economic recovery, although I wonder if they aren't up really for the same reason all other assets in China – and the rest of the world – are up: lots of liquidity and plenty of leverage.

caixinglobal.com/2021-02-19/cop…
2/5

China accounted for over half of global copper consumption in 2019, with construction of power facilities taking up 37% of the volume, the real estate sector accounting for 21% and consumer appliances 15% of the total. This year I expect consumer appliances to do very...
3/5

well as we get a partial recovery of last year's contraction in consumption, but for that reason I also think growth in infrastructure and real-estate investment will be weaker. The regulators have made it clear that they want to restrain the growth in the country's debt...
Read 5 tweets
19 Feb
1/4

Beijing continues to take small steps to ease capital outflows. Clearly the country is having trouble digesting large inflows on the trade and financial accounts, but while the world – and China in the long run – would be much better off if it...

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/4

recycled these inflows by importing foreign goods, thus helping to add to global demand, in the short run this continues to be too difficult, and so China must recycle these inflows by acquiring assets abroad, in this case, by private Chinese individuals.
3/4

This is bad for the global economy, of course, but I think it is also making the Chinese financial system riskier. When rising financial inflows from foreign investors are netted against rising private Chinese acquisition of assets abroad, the inevitable result is a...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!