From the future archives

Actually Existing Brexit - Macmillan United States of Europe (English USE Federal Dependency) Education paper, pub. 2049

“Brexit was never an ideology to serve the needs of a ‘sovereign’ population. /1. Image
Its aim was profoundly to restructure political, social and economic life. ‘Actually Existing Brexit’ was voted for by no one. During its first 30 days ‘Actually Existing Brexit’ proved its non-viability. /2.
Economic, social & political forces engendered within it immediately started to destroy it & the UK from within. And the pattern of its disastrous implosion was linked inextricably to the nature of ‘Actually Existing Brexit’./3.
‘Actually Existing Brexit’ was just another authoritarian regime. It was misleadingly labelled ‘populist’. Its ideological underpinning was nationalist & racist. In countless ways, it was socially regressive”. /4. End

Enjoy the original 👇

macmillanexplorers.com/actually-exist…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Levi

Andrew Levi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndrewPRLevi

15 Feb
Brexit “vaccine victory”. EU-UK “vaccine war”. Intra-EU squabbling. We can learn something vital. Existential. Not about vaccines. Nor pandemics. And not what Brexiters or “I-like-the-EU-but-feel-I-must-criticise-it-now” commentators claim. Join me, on a short journey & long🧵/1.
.@guyverhofstadt criticises the EU’s vaccine policy & its execution, launching a barely veiled, ferocious, personal attack on @vonderleyen. Notably, however, he concludes the strategic answer is much greater central EU power, a “Health Union”. /2.

.@quatremer defends the EU approach in an opinion piece in @guardian, much derided by @robertshrimsley (often sympathetic to the EU), & @giselastuart (a co-chair of Vote Leave), among many others. /3.

amp.theguardian.com/world/commenti…
Read 41 tweets
13 Feb
Arbitrary removal of millions of people’s citizenship rights in the UK is a cause for national shame, not celebratory (& inaccurate) government statements.

My tweet, below, refers to it being 2021, not 1935. Some have asked why 1935?

History in a tweet™️ follows.../1. Image
History in a tweet™️: 1935 Nürnberg Race Laws

The German govt removed, & replaced with inferior status, citizenship rights of those deemed not German. Specifically “Jews”, defined by the Nazis. Oppression & industrialised murder followed.

(Tweet on current relevance next)./2.
Current relevance of 1935 Laws

2020 Immigration Act removes, & replaces with inferior status, citizenship rights in UK of millions deemed not British. Unlike 1935 it doesn’t criminalise sexual relations with those of pure “blood” & hasn’t led to killing.

(Discussion next). /3
Read 7 tweets
7 Feb
@DAOBarry You put your finger on the crucial aspects of international law: good faith, & power. The GFA/ BA is an international agreement, with legally binding treaty force & no exit clause. /1.
@DAOBarry Voluntary recourse by both parties to arbitration is available, for genuine differences in interpretation. If both seek arbitration & accept any ruling, no one else is likely to wish to intervene. /2.
@DAOBarry However, in this case, if RoI views & those of the rest of the EU, diverged (very unlikely) it would get complicated. If the US were unhappy, that would also be tricky. But most likely a way would be found, behind the scenes, to get a result all could accept. /3.
Read 9 tweets
6 Feb
Brexit & Northern Ireland. Don’t you just love the bemused response to groups angry at the results of a border down the Irish Sea, & the lies told about it? “But they voted for it” & “suck it up, you wanted a hard Brexit, dumbos” miss the point. There is one. Bear with me. /1.
Stoking potential violence is completely irresponsible. Those doing it must stop. But it mightn’t be a bad idea if the rest of the UK - not least supporters of the lunatic, unsustainable hard Brexit of which we’re experiencing the early, predictably awful throes - .../2.
... understood what’s really going on. People in NI, of whatever political, cultural or other persuasion, aren’t stupid. They’re like everyone else: products of circumstance & their own ability to respond. /3.
Read 24 tweets
4 Feb
Massively appreciate your positivity @BReid27. As MD of UK Trade & Investment, working closely with Invest NI was always a top priority for me. But (you know well) political instability kills investment/ wealth creation. NIP offers potential opportunities. Reality’s different./1.
The Protocol’s the result of a bodged Brexit, founded on falsehoods & failures. Key features - a frontier between NI & the rest of the UK, partial EU control over NI as an enclave distinct from the UK (GB), no prior vote to agree to what many see as a change of NI status .../2.
... in/ relative to the UK - are accepted neither by the governing party of the UK nor by the largest NI party. Even though they voted for them in the House of Commons. It’s a fundamentally unstable, untenable situation. /3.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!