"Avoision" is the term coined by British economist Arthur Seldon in his 1978 Book Tax Avoision. It's the middle zone between avoiding taxes (legal if ethically questionable) and evading taxes (illegal and usually criminal). Donald Trump has lived in that zone for decades.
Bart Simpson here to explain Tax Avoision to a Manhattan Grand Jury.
The theoretical origin of the term "avoision" is not American, but British. Here is Arthur Seldon's 1978 book Tax Avoision. Americans however, have excelled at putting the theory to practice. Perhaps none as much as our 45th President. amazon.com/Tax-Avoision-E…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"But [Professor Ramseyer's] remarks were a “blessing in disguise” because they created a huge controversy, added Ms. Lee, who was kidnapped by Japanese soldiers during World War II and raped repeatedly. “So this is kind of a wake up call.”"
Indeed. Rape is a war crime.
Endorsement of child rape and sex trafficking is not "economics."
Statement about Mark Ramseyer's "Comfort Women" article by Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg, chief economist of the World Bank (2018=2020) and Elihu Professor of Economics at Yale University. chwe.net/irle/pinelopi_…
A brilliant take down by Harvard law professor @JeannieSGersen of a misogynistic "law and economics" article written by Mark Ramsayer justifying sex slavery during WWII. Forcing women to have sex with soldiers is not an economic transaction. It's rape. newyorker.com/culture/annals…
Here is Mark Ramseyer's earlier (2019) paper attributing the painful memories of WWII sex slaves ("comfort women") to fabrications made up by "liberal professors."
Unbelievable.
A 1991 law and economics paper about "private ordering" (same author) titled "Indentured Prostitution in Imperial Japan: Credible Commitments in the Commercial Sex Industry"
Page one is all about buying and selling children....
Something's wrong here. jstor.org/stable/764879?
Letter by over 1000 signatories, including over 700 economics professors and over 200 game theorists, demanding retraction of Mark Ramseyer's article falsely claiming Korean women held as WW2 sex slaves willingly contracted for prostitution with soldiers. chwe.net/irle/letter/
Letter from history professors and other concerned scholars asking the International Review of Law and Economics to retract Mark Ramseyer's seriously flawed "research" claiming Korean women held as WW2 sex slaves willingly contracted for prostitution. sites.google.com/view/concerned…
Amazing. Yet another paper is exposed for covering up horrific atrocities. Revisionist history is not scholarship.
Harvard professor Ramseyer to revise paper on 1923 massacre of Koreans in Japan: Cambridge handbook editor yna.kr/AEN20210220002…
Before publishing, Harvard "law and economics" professors should consult research Harvard is already aware of on the Kantō Massacre and other historical events. Revisionism is the historical equivalent of fake news. harvard-yenching.org/research/the-g…
A Harvard professor is on pretty thin ice if someone such as myself criticizes his publications for being “revisionist history” and the only people who come to his defense are extreme nationalists from Japan or any other country.
This is corrupt. A PAC funded with large contributions from past University of Minnesota presidents and current University regents, and using University trademarks, made campaign contributions to influence state lawmakers’ selection of new regents.
A $10,000 contribution to Maroon & Gold PAC from former University of Minnesota President Eric Kaler. That's a lot. And we also know that Kaler wants the legislators who receive this PAC money to get rid of University Regent Michael Hsu.
After I wrote a letter to the University President, Regents and General Counsel a month ago, and after Maroon & Gold PAC had raised a lot of its money, the University reversed course and asked the PAC to stop using University trademarks and mascots to raise money.
This letter is a devastating take down of dishonest and unsubstantiated arguments underlying Mark Ramseyer's article claiming that women kept as WWII sex slaves entered valid contracts as prostitutes. The Journal should retract the article immediately. sites.google.com/view/concerned…
"On page 4 of his article Ramseyer relates the story of a Japanese girl named Osaki who traveled abroad to work at a brothel in Borneo at the age of ten. He uses this example as evidence for his fundamental claims: that women agreed to contracts, that they were paid large sums.."
This Elsevier Journal thinks an article describing how teenage girls entered into "contracts" for sex with soldiers passes "peer review." Does your library pay the $1431 institutional subscription fee for the International Review of Law and Economics?