1/ The Buffett shareholder letter has got me thinking about what a great capital allocator he has been at #BRK. One of the best ever. Henry Singleton, Tom Murphy & a few others are right along side him.
2/ A great capital allocator in my opinion can be correlated with long-term market outperformance. @chriswmayer makes this case in his book #100baggers. William Thorndike hammers the point in #theoutsiders
3/ So what are the capital allocation decisions that made #Buffett and others so great? And how can we identify a CEO that can allocate effectively?
4/ Firstly, we have acquisitions. The ability to acquire a business at the right price is critical for any allocator. In the shareholder letter, Buffett shares many of the successful acquisitions #BRK has made, but also some of the mistakes.
5/ @brettkellySYD is CEO of a micro-cap in Australia $KPG. He has continually acquired accounting firms at around 4x EBITDA and less than 1x sales. A fragmented industry of ‘mom and pop’ business can be beneficial.
6/ Henry Singleton is another great serial acquirer and arguably the best capital allocator ever. Buffett & Munger have both suggested Singleton is second to none.
7/ Singleton took advantage of Teledyne’s public valuation. When trading above high multiples, he would raise capital to acquire private businesses at low multiples. Taking advantage of the arbitrage situation between public and private markets.
8/ Second capital allocation decision to discuss is share buybacks. Again, Singleton is the best example. During his time as CEO he bought back 90% of all outstanding shares.
9/ He would raise capital during the early days when trading at high multiples. But when they became cheap, he bought back more shares than any other CEO in history. During his time at Teledyne he turned $1 of shareholder value into $180.
10/ Thirdly, is not paying a dividend. Buffett has been very public about never paying a dividend due to tax inefficiencies. He and many others suggest reinvesting that capital for growth or even buying back shares will increase shareholder value more than paying out dividends.
11/ Of course there are times dividends are a good option of capital allocation. For example, if a company is trading above intrinsic value and have no opportunities to reinvest the capital for growth, then a dividend would usually be a better decision than a buyback.
12/ there are other ways management can intelligently allocate capital, although I just wanted to highlight a few that have made Buffett so great. His 2020 shareholder letter highlighted some of these brilliant decisions.
13/ Here are a few of Buffett’s best capital allocations;
Sees Candy & GEICO acquisitions, consistent buybacks below intrinsic value and reinvesting rather than paying a dividend.
The shareholder letter this year has highlighted the importance of capital allocation.
14/ Overall, I think it’s important for investors to put an emphasis on finding a skilful capital allocator. If you are looking for above market returns, you need to find above average capital allocators. Ideally, we are searching for the next Buffett, Singleton or Murphy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2017 VIC pitch on $AXON is the fastest 50-bagger I've ever seen.
In 2017, AXON was a $1bn Mcap virtual monopoly, supplying 95% of U.S. police departments with Tasers and a crown jewel, rapidly scaling SaaS biz.
Yet, the stock had a 36% short interest.
So, what's the deal?👇
1/
Well, to understand $AXON phenomenon you need to realize just how entrenched its moat was in the legacy business.
The company is in 17,000 of 18,000 (~95%) of police departments nationwide and is basically a monopoly in the domestic ‘Conducted Electrical Weapons’ (“CEWs”) space.
Out of the ~600,000 patrol officers in the U.S., ~400,000 carried a TASER.
Now, imagine introducing SaaS solution into that market and what that could do to your topline.
2/
The Software and Sensors business revolved around selling body cameras and evidence management software.
While hardware was largely a commodity, the real value lay in evidence.com, a cloud-based platform that let agencies securely store and manage digital evidence—videos, photos, audio, reports, and TASER records.
Network effects emerged as agencies shared evidence with DAs, prosecutors, and other departments, embedding Axon deeper into law enforcement workflows.
2011 VIC pitch on $AMZN is one of the best educational case studies on investing in multibaggers.
In 2011, this was a huge $85bn Mcap company at 100x PE with major banks calling it overvalued.
How do you push past all that as a die-hard value investor? Let’s dive in 👇
1/
Make sure you understand the moat of the business—how wide it is and how much wider it can grow.
The author doesn’t talk much about the growth potential of the web services business.
However, he does capture the most important piece of the core operation: e-commerce as a percentage of total retail globally was just 3% back then compared to 20% today.
Meanwhile, shorts missed the forest for the trees (see the screenshot).
2/
Valuation is more than just a science or an art; as Aswath Damodaran says, it’s a craft. So, some degree of flexibility in how you think about the future of earnings and the business is of utmost importance.
Nothing complicated is required either. The author conservatively estimates how large Amazon’s core operation can grow and then considers how much market share can be taken away from larger competitors.
They easily arrive at a number that is multiple times larger than the company’s size at the time. No need for complicated DCFs or precise comparables. Again, don’t miss the forest for the trees.
Again, take a look at the valuation part—this is the beauty of investing in my eyes.
Thread/ 'Reflections on the Ten Attributes of Great Investors'
In 2016, Michael Mauboussin wrote an article reflecting on 30 years of researching the greatest investors and identifying the traits made them successful.
Below is a summary of the ten attributes he identified
1/ Be numerate (and understand accounting).
To be a successful investor, you have to be comfortable with numbers. There are rarely complicated calculations but a feel for figures, percentages, and probabilities is essential.
2/ Understand value (the present value of free cash flow)
The present value of future free cash flow determines the value of a financial asset. This is true for stocks, bonds, and real estate. Valuation is challenging for equity investors because of cash flows, timing, and risk
$MNST was trading at 25-30x fwd earnings, 16x BV, and 23x EBITDA while facing a fears competition on a seemingly faddish product.
Compelling, isn't it? Yet decades later, $MNST is in 100-bagger+ territory.
Worst short ever?👇
1/ $MNST's case is one of my favorites to look into among all the multi-bagger cases presented here before.
True testament to how hard it is to catch onto ideas like this and hold onto them for dear life to turn the stock into the biggest career winner.
2/ I believe it was practically impossible to bet on $MNST in 2005 due to several factors:
- High valuation
- Seemingly a faddish product
- Competition from Red Bull (market leader) and two of the most successful beverage companies ever, $KO and $PEP.
How do you bet on a small cap with those characteristics?
Below is a collection of Nick Sleeps’ comments on concentration vs diversification, from the Nomad Investment Partnership letters.👇
1/
“The church of diversification, in whose pews the professional fund management industry sits, proposes many holdings. They do this not because managers have so many insights, but so few! Diversity, in this context, is seen as insurance against any one idea being wrong”…
2/
“Like Darwin, we find ourselves disagreeing with the theocracy. We would propose that if knowledge is a source of value added, and few things can be known for sure, then it logically follows that owning more stocks, does not lower risk but raises it”…