A good way to convince people that they need to take what the Bible says seriously is by showing that you take it seriously when it calls you to love your neighbor, pray for your enemies, care for the least of these, bear your cross, bear one another's burdens, and pursue peace.
The "apologetic of action" has always been powerful in the history of the church. Multitudes of people did not come into proximity to the life of the church because they were convinced of some abstract apologetic argument. Rather, it was because Christians were living out
a new ethic from a new kingdom from a God who speaks life through his Word. They saw goodness and blessing pour over from the lives of Christians. "Could Jesus be real?" was not an abstract question, but a question they asked when they saw the poor fed, the wounded healed,
the orphan finding a home, the widow dignified.

In this day and age where the church in the U.S. is filled with stories of abuse, hypocrisy, and grabs for power, people are not looking for the next best intellectual argument for the existence of God. They couldn't care less
about the impossibility of the contrary, presuppositional apologetics, or the idea of borrowed capital. They care about authentic and lively faith. They care about being wrapped up into a story that seems too good to be true. They care about a faith that proclaims a God of the
oppressed and a Savior of the weary and heavy-laden. They want a faith that walks as much as it talks and that values consistency between what you do and what you say. They want to see a faith that brings the kingdom to bear here and now, not a pie in the sky, off in the horizon
fantasy of escape.

Now is a good of a time as any to reshape our apologetic method and apologetic vision.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Timothy Isaiah Cho

Timothy Isaiah Cho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tisaiahcho

28 Feb
These are not apologies:

"I'm sorry you felt that way," "I'm sorry if...," "I'm sorry.... But...," "I'm sorry for what happened," "I'm sorry for the miscommunication."

Christians who understand grace live that out with true apologies.
Secular sources even understand what fake and inadequate apologies look like, and that an apology requires sincerity, empathy, restitution, and a promise.

psychologytoday.com/us/blog/make-i…
When was the last time you've been discipled within the church about how to apologize and had that publicly modeled?

So many evangelical and Reformed church cultures act as though a true apology is tantamount to apostasy. Many leaders absolutely refuse to truly apologize.
Read 9 tweets
28 Feb
A Christian counseling methodology that only accounts for people as sinners and not also as sinned against is woefully incompetent and deleterious to souls. And yet, the disturbing irony is that such methodologies get the stamp of approval of being "biblical counseling."
Such "biblical counseling" can't be truly biblical with such a deficient view of sin and its effects - we know that the Bible speaks clearly about whole categories of being sinned against, including interpersonal, systemic, and oppressive. And yet, this "biblical counseling"
only deals with everything within the narrow category of sinner - what did you do wrong, what should you repent of, what you can change moving forward.

Such "biblical counseling" also positions itself with a sense of arrogance, as though it has the corner of the market
Read 7 tweets
27 Feb
People who have experienced bullying in their childhood are often adept at recognizing the same bullying tactics among adults in the church.
Here's a good refresher for what bullying looks like among school aged children. Sadly, you can see these among Christians, even Christian leaders.

stopbullying.gov/bullying/what-…
Here's a good resource on workplace bullying. There are quite a few parallels as they relate to working in Christian nonprofits and church settings that are toxic.

healthline.com/health/workpla…?
Read 4 tweets
27 Feb
I don't believe that Christian leaders need to be experts on a certain subject before they can weigh in with their opinion on it. However, I do believe that Christian leaders need to realize the impact their influence has and the implicit faith that their followers place on them.
It's very high stakes when a Christian leader decides to weigh in on a subject that has ripple effects on the way vulnerable people are treated or mistreated. It's also very high stakes when a Christian leader remains silent when he/she must speak up.
Christian leaders should therefore lead with a posture that is full of humility and is open to correction. Rather than make hyperbolic statements, broad generalizations, and "I have the last word" rhetoric, Christian leaders should do their own homework the best they can,
Read 10 tweets
26 Feb
Just because a system comes from God doesn't mean that it's magically immune from heinous sin.

I believe that presbyterianism is most consistent with a biblical theological church polity. Yet, I firmly believe that more work needs to be done to the system to prevent abuses.
I don't believe that just having "presbyterian" in your denomination's name or following every jot and tittle about what seems to be the most "presbyterian" way of doing things will prevent abuse and its coverups within our circles. We must create more safeguards and
mechanisms to ensure that the vulnerable are protected, power is used for blessing, and godliness has the last word over orderliness.

So many God ordained systems in the Bible were used by sinners for heinous sin (just think of the religious leaders of Jesus' day!). This should
Read 5 tweets
21 Feb
Piper and Grudem are a primary proponent of a bizarre interpretation of Judges:

"Deborah, a prophetess, judge, and mother in Israel..., along with Jael..., was a living indictment of the weakness of Barak and other men in Israel who should have been more courageous leaders."
I heard this same interpretation proliferated through seminary and in Reformed churches as assumed fact. Yet, the fact of the matter is that nowhere in the Bible does it hint at the fact that Deborah, Jael, & other leading women were an indictment against failed male leadership.
It's actually placing a grid of interpretation upon the biblical text. It's reading a presupposition of "manhood and womanhood" into the text where the Bible actually commends Deborah and Jael (Judges 5). "Most blessed of women be Jael..." the biblical text says, not "this was
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!