Sadly, @TuckerCarlson frequently misleads his audience. Tonight is no exception. He lied about me, and it's worth exposing how. He starts at the 5:24 mark in the clip below. Apart from the various personal insults, he accuses me of hypocrisy /1:
The basic case is that I'm a hypocrite for writing this article about Trump's Syria policy in 2018 while supporting Biden's strikes again Iranian-allied militias that had killed a Filipino contractor and wounded five Americans. Here's my 2018 piece: /2 nationalreview.com/2018/04/trump-…
Tucker of course counts on the fact that his audience trusts him. His audience trusts Tucker and his team to do their homework and tell the truth. Yet if they did their homework and told the truth, they'd say my position is clear and consistent, then and now: /3
I did not and do not support attacking a Syrian regime that had not attacked us. I did and do support launching attacks against terrorist militias (ISIS or Iranian-backed) that have attacked us and intend to attack again. I've had the same position for Obama, Trump, and Biden. /4
I strongly opposed initiating new military hostilities against the Assad regime under Obama, for both constitutional and strategic reasons. For example, this is what I wrote in NR in 2013: /5 (nationalreview.com/magazine/2013/…): 
I continued that opposition during the Trump administration and objected to his strikes against the Assad regime. In both cases I knew that Assad was evil, but I still believed it was a strategic mistake and constitutional violation to attack: /6:
But note my qualifier--"Trump undoubtedly has the authority to direct military responses when American forces are under attack or face an imminent threat." That's the situation Biden just faced. He didn't attack the Assad regime, he attacked forces that days ago attacked us. /7
And in fact, I endorsed Trump strikes under the same circumstances. This is what I wrote in Time after Trump ordered the strike that killed Qasem Soleimani (time.com/5759007/trumps…) /8:
In the video bit, Tucker says, "We're keeping track." I'd assume that meant he or his team read my relevant work and chose to mislead his audience anyway. He also says "war makes David French feel powerful and alive." What a gross insult and utterly contrary to what I believe. /9
He closes with a final material omission. Speaking of my tweet about Biden's strike, he says, "Good, he wrote. Then he went back to writing essays about what a fine Christian he is." But my actual tweet is below. What did he leave out? /10
Why would Tucker omit "Targeting our troops should carry a consequence"? Because that sentence undermines his entire diatribe. I'm unbothered by policy differences. Lies, omissions, and playground insults are a different matter. At that was Tucker's tactic tonight. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
