It is highly relevant that the Australian cabinet minister accused of rape (who media refuse to identify) is the AG Christian Porter.
It doesn't matter whether criminal charges are sustainable. The issue is how this affects his ability to do his job. smh.com.au/politics/feder…
It's as tho people have learned nothing from the discourse in the US over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. There was no suggestion there that criminal charges could be brought. The issue was his fitness to be on the court.
The Kavanaugh hearings were not a criminal trial, they were the equivalent of a "job interview." There can be an equivalent investigation into these allegations against Christian Porter.
In South Dakota, law makers are impeaching the AG over his conduct in a hit and run, independent of criminal charges. washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/02…
It is absolutely horrific that the victim in this case took her own life, but she left a detailed statement, which can be used in any investigation. Rape cases are always difficult to prove because there are rarely witnesses and come down to credibility.
Again, here this would not a criminal trial, the standard would not be beyond a reasonable doubt. It would be an assessment of the minister's character as to whether he was a suitable person to hold the office of AG.
A government that fails to investigate such serious accusations AGAINST ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL does not care about sexual violence or justice under the law.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NY AG Tish James says she presented the strongest possible case against the cops who killed Daniel Prude to the grand jury, but the state's expert witness, Gary Vilke, has only ever testified for law enforcement and concluded that they acted lawfully. 9news.com/article/news/i…
This is Dr. Vilke under cross examination in the civil case regarding the police killing of Brandon Wroth in 2019.
In the killing of Daniel Prude, he concluded that Mr. Prude died due to "excited delirium." This is a diagnosis that is not recognized by the American Medical Association or American Psychiatric Association and is used to justify police violence against Black and Brown people.
I may get a lot of flak for mentioning this, but was chatting earlier with a friend about it:
How is it that in all the coverage of Tiger Woods, no one seemed to bring up his saying he was bothered when people called him African American and that he identified as Cablinasian?
It's relevant to his legacy. People can't be complicated now?
I mean I thought it was ridiculous to be talking about "his legacy" when he was alive, but that's what the coverage was and it was never mentioned.
I have represented Black people charged with felony leaving the scene of an accident when they have driven just a few blocks so they can safely stop their car, but the South Dakota AG actually killed someone, drove home and returned the next day, and is charged with misdemeanors?
The penalty for this charge in South Dakota is up to 2 years in prison.
I believe the conduct here in fact makes out a charge of manslaughter.
Joseph Boever, the person Attorney General Ravnsborg killed, was carrying a flashlight, which detectives themselves said would have been like “a beacon of light” in the dark night. washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/02…
Three days after George Floyd was killed, Derek Chauvin agreed to plead guilty to third degree murder and serve a term of at least ten years in federal prison, before the deal was revoked by Attorney General Bill Barr who was concerned it was too lenient. nytimes.com/2021/02/10/us/…
Chauvin's new trial on state charges is due to start in a few weeks, although prosecutors are asking for an adjournment and are appealing the court's decision to sever Chauvin's trial from the other officers involved in Mr. Floyd's murder.
The defense plans to put Mr. Floyd's character on trial.
In a series of motions filed this week, Chauvin's defense attorney asked the court to allow testimony about Mr. Floyd’s alleged drug use and to forbid anyone at trial from referring to Mr. Floyd as the "victim."
In 2001, a jury convicted Stephanie Mohr of police brutality after she sicced her police dog on a homeless man as he stood face against a wall with his hands in the air.
This wasn't a one-off incident, but rather a pattern of violence by Ms. Mohr. She had previously released her dog on a Black teenager sleeping in a hammock in his own backyard.
She had threatened relatives that she would let her dog attack their “Black ass” if they did not tell her where a person she was looking for was.