There's a lot of hype around NFTs and very little nuance around them.

I tend to see 2 arguments:

1. This is the future
2. This is worthless

The world is not black & white.

NFTs are not useless, nor are they that useful intrinsically. But so are many other things in life.

๐Ÿงต
1/ Let's first agree on a definition:

NFTS are unique, digital assets. You may liken them to a trading card or art.

Scarcity is built into the asset, so is often worth more than its inherent utility.

In buying an NFT, you are betting that ppl will care about it in the future.
2/ Now let's address whether "NFTs are worthless"

NFTs = tech, allowing you to monetize & track ownership of the underlying asset.

Ex: An artist can sell X to A, but also get a cut when A sells that asset to B.

This tracking mechanism is worth something. How much? It depends.
3/ Why does it depend? NFTs tend to trade on *extrinsic*, not *intrinsic* value.

Intrinsic value is the utility of X.

Beef has utility bc I can eat it. A stove has utility bc I can cook the beef. Gas has utility bc it powers a stove.

Extrinsic value is harder to quantify.
4/ But this concept is not new, nor is it crazy.

A trading card is worth 5c intrinsically. But ppl still buy them for thousands.

In doing so, they are betting that someone will care about them later.

The extrinsic value is determined collectively by the market over time.
5/ Similarly, ppl buy designer bags for thousands.

We already know that there are knock-offs of every designer bag, but people still choose to pay a significant premium for the "real deal", even if utility is the same.

Why? Again, bc of extrinsic value (status, in this case)
6/ Another common argument is that you can just take a screenshot of an NFT. It's true!

You can also take a picture of the Mona Lisa or buy a print for pennies on the $.

Look, I just shared the original here!

Yet, there's still value in the OG, at least in our society today.
7/ There are numerous ex of a scarce asset's extrinsic value >>> intrinsic value.

1. Supreme shirts for $k
2. Sneakers for tens of $k
3. Arowana fish for hundreds of $k

Humans are irrational.

NFTs' utility doesn't "add up", but that's true for many other things in this world.
8/ The hard part of "getting" NFTs is that ppl view their intrinsic value as 0 and a premium as a multiple.

And of course, 0*anything=0...

But extrinsic value is additive, not multiplicative.

โœ… Value = intrinsic value + extrinsic value
โŒ Value = intrinsic value * premium
9/ That's why ppl have an easier time wrapping their head around a physical asset.

They know the asset is worth AT LEAST X (intrinsic value), whereas they know an NFT is worth AT LEAST 0.

But remember: there are many things in life worth AT LEAST 0, that trade for much more.
10/ OK, is the hype justified?

That's not for me to decide. The market will decide.

But just remember: for a collectible to continue having value, it must continue having relevance.

And just one person's opinion: many of the NFTs today will not be relevant in the future.
11/ If you want to speculate on NFTs, you should be asking:

"Do I think ppl will care more or less about this in the future?"

That's why IMHO paying $m for @beeple art actually makes more sense than paying $5k for an avg image, where the extrinsic value is v likely to decline.
12/ NFTs trade on scarcity, so the very fact that there are so many NFTs concerns me.

Imagine if EVERYONE said they were selling "designer" bags. You would laugh.

There is value in status, but it can't be invented overnight, much less by just putting something on a blockchain.
13/ NFTs, much like other assets in their infancy, will mature over time.

Until then, there is a lot of noise to cut through. But that doesn't mean that the asset class is useless.

Just do the diligence of understanding what bet you're making, if you want to speculate.
14/ TL;DR

NFTs are neither useless, nor that useful (intrinsically)

But, that doesn't diverge from many asset classes that already exist.

Separating from B/W arguments like "this has no value" allows us to think through its role in the world we live in: an irrational one. ๐Ÿ™ƒ
PS:

This is not financial advice! (Duh)

I'm just a girl sending 280 character messages into the ether. ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Steph Smith

Steph Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stephsmithio

1 Mar
Companies often make $ in ways that you may not expect.

People learning that Robinhood monetizes via PFOF is just one case.

Decoding companies & their biz models equips you to build more creatively, with more tools in your toolbox.

A few examples... ๐Ÿงต

1/ Amazon: they just sell stuff online, right?

Yes... and no. Their profit center is AWS, making 50%+ of all profits ($Bs) for the giant.

Another sneaky tidbit about AMZN: their advertising business outperformed Twitter's last decade in 2020 alone.

2/ Airlines just sell flights, right?

No. In fact, their mileage programs are worth billions.

An appraisal of the U.S. part of the AAdvantage program was between $19.5-$31.5B... MORE than American is worth, total.

Airlines used these programs to secure $Bs in pandemic loans.
Read 7 tweets
17 Feb
After covering numerous companies at Trends, I've noticed: people think of competition too narrowly.

This is indicative of not understanding the root problem being solved.

Competition != products w the same features
Competition = anything overlapping w core value provided

๐Ÿงต
Ex 1: Quibi died quickly. Some blame it on COVID. Others on frivolous spending.

But their oversight was thinking that they were competing with Netflix or Disney Plus.

Their competition was Twitter, TikTok, or your #1 podcast. Free, on-demand entertainment.
Ex 2: Neflix has fared much better.

Why? They understand the complexity of their competition graph.

Reed Hastings has astutely noted that it's not just Disney+ or HBO. They also compete with... sleep.

Their goal is to get more of your overall entertainment timeshare.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!