A note on the personal allowance, frozen at £12750 until 2026.
When New Labour came to power, it was £4045 - and STILL only £5225 a decade later. Disgracefully, indefensibly low, and an indictment of Gordon "50p for pensioners/scrap the 10% tax rate" Brown.
The only major rise in the personal allowance throughout Labour's time in charge was from £5225 to £6035 when Alastair Darling was Chancellor. Credit to him for that.
Quickly increasing it was, of course, a Lib Dem policy in 2010, which the Tories quickly realised was popular.
So it hit 10K by 2014, a year earlier than even the Lib Dems had planned, and had hit 12.5K by 2019: a remarkable increase over one decade.
A personal allowance of just over 1K a month strikes me as pretty reasonable when inflation remains low.
Critics argue that increases in the personal allowance are regressive in that they benefit better off people most. I think that's getting it the wrong way round.
Fundamentally, it's always been the right thing to do - and its level under New Labour was a damn disgrace.
Incidentally, it should say 'frozen at £12570' in the OP.
How do you take the poorest out of having to pay tax? By taking them out of making national insurance contributions - which start at a mindbogglingly low income threshold.
But to do that, you'd have to increase the amount of NI paid by the not particularly well off.
That's going to happen sooner or later given the epic pensions timebomb which will hit in the 2030s.
The 10% tax rate should also be brought back in my view. It's hardly beyond the wit of HMRC systems to do that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Right now, and for the next few months too, Labour is completely and utterly at the mercy of events. That's partly not its fault; but it's partly its fault too.
These remain unique circumstances in which the opposition just isn't given a hearing - and politics is over Zoom.
The advantage that gives the government is enormous.
1. The media won't report the message even if there is one
2. Politics by Zoom is far too staid for anyone to get excited or enthused by anything really. It'd even prevent the public getting to know a good opposition leader.
That leaves the government and its incredibly pliant media apparatus constantly making the political weather. On everything. Against the backdrop of a public which just wants to get through this - but can see the light at the end of the tunnel now.
Do pigeons gossip with each other? "Here, you want to check out Shaun's Balcony: it's the best restaurant in town".
I've had SEVEN different pigeons visit this morning. 😍 Including five at the same time - and a hilarious defeat for Alpha Male bully, who flew off in retreat.
He did his best to poke and squawk his way to balcony domination. He failed. 🤣
Memo to Alpha Male bully: this is a socialist balcony, and greed will not be tolerated.
Today's episode of Pigeon Street, incidentally, provided the perfect lesson on why joining a union is a good idea.
A couple of weeks back, Alpha Bully saw off his competition because the latter was outnumbered: three (Alpha, his mate and their offspring) against one.
All private hospitals except one - the British Hospital, which is the best and most expensive - are effectively part of the public system. All employers and employees choose a 'mutualista' (provider) and get the same coverage as someone paying privately.
Americans are always shocked when they come here and find how incredibly cheap healthcare is. In Uruguay, the concept of 'pre-existing conditions' barely exists at all. Where it does, it's only for over-70 expats.
As a gentleman, a scholar and a man of impeccable taste, the late, great Ian St John was every bit as contemptuous of Baddiel and Skinner as the likes of Jason Lee or Sylvia Kristel.
Those presenters weren't just racist. They even ridiculed alcoholism.
From Saint's autobio:
"Both of us regretted the experience. Neither Skinner nor Baddiel came to us before the show to say hello and give us some idea of what they were doing. We were simply the vehicles for what could only be described as an elaborate effort to put us down...
"Greavsie got so irritated he uttered a few expletives. You wonder about the point, and the right of them to sneer at men who have got to the top of the national game by their talent and their effort".
So, I've just seen the Gordon Elliott photo. 🤮🤬😭 What's seen can't be unseen. But the hypocritical bullshit around all this is a sick joke.
Why does horse racing exist? So it can make a disgusting industry filthy rich by gambling on magnificent animals used for human greed.
That's what it's all about. Greed. And exploitation: of animals and of people. Gambling addictions wreck countless lives - including the friends and loved ones of addicts.
Then look at the 'sport' (my arse) itself. It STILL allows the whip to be used. Why? Utterly disgusting.
And when a horse wins a big race, who's the first to be congratulated? Not the jockey, not the horse... but the f*****g owner. For whom it's all about the benjamins; nothing else.
This 'sport' should be banned. So should greyhound and any form of animal racing.
Climate change was first discovered in, get this, the 1960s. Scientists immediately began sounding the alarm.
Philosophers supplied the horribly accurate rejoinder that humans would be too selfish, too short-termist and too plain stupid to do a damn thing about it.
"Save the planet?! We haven't even learned how to take care of ourselves yet!"
Imagine a baseball hurtling towards someone's head. The massive majority of humans wait for the baseball to hit them full in the face before doing anything.
And in the case of climate catastrophe, most humans haven't even been able to see the baseball at all.
But there will always remain one thing that completely bewilders me. Totally baffles me. And which is the ultimate indictment of neoliberalism.