I've decided to pull back from talking about race on social media. There are many reasons for this but the most important one for me is it has come to feel like a pointless energy drain that doesn't seem to make a difference.
During the summer, I was inspired to use my "platform" to be a "voice" but I don't think it has been very productive. Although many commenters have accused me of talking about race out of self-interest, I actually see it as a moral duty to help. A duty and often a burden.
I'm sure it has professionally hurt me. For instance, many people have made assumptions about my competence and intellectual background that simply aren't true.
Many people assume I must not test very high on standardized tests. I test extremely highly. Perfect score high. (No I'm not going to share my actual scores. 1. It's gross and 2. it doesn't matter.) This shouldn't be a surprise. Lots of people at Harvard have good resumes.
Many people have accused me of being a recipient of affirmative action. As an international student I'm not eligible for affirmative action. Universities don't get to claim me as "diversity" in their statistics to the US government. They get no credit for enrolling me.
As far as I know, most PhD students at my university are funded through Americans-only grant money from the US government (which is a kind of affirmative action for Americans). In my case, it's different. It costs Harvard money out of their own pocket to train me.
Apart from my personal experiences, I have absolutely nothing original to say about racism in academia.
Everything I've ever said amounts to racism is a pervasive force in American society and touches on almost every system including academic science and mathematics. Despite how revolutionary this sounds to many Americans, it's just basic American Sociology 101.
Finally, talking about race attracts unstable, extremist personalities. This is the first time I've admitted this to anyone but I have started taking precautions for my physical safety. I haven't even told my loved ones because I didn't want them to worry. Who needs this crap!?
In conclusion, "Best of Luck with the Culture Wars, Twitter!" but I'm taking a break.

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with ๐Ÿ”ฅ Kareem Carr ๐Ÿ”ฅ

๐Ÿ”ฅ Kareem Carr ๐Ÿ”ฅ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kareem_carr

28 Feb
Any philosophers of science willing to vouch for the accuracy of this chart?

I don't think my view is represented here. Basically, I think scientific models start out lower down and can be moved upwards through different degrees of reality as work on them. Image
So my perspective is sort of a No-Free-Lunch or Very-Little-Free-Lunch perspective on scientific realism. Before I accept your theory, I want to characterize how much work you did and what kind. I don't want to give you "scientific reality" for free.
This is why I'm kind of a skeptic on "2+2=4" because in almost all cases one has done no real work to verify that a statement like this describes all of physical reality in practice. "All of reality" is very big you see.
Read 4 tweets
27 Feb
Statistics Formulas Explained!

This is a thread for data science beginners with a fun little twist at the end for the pros!

It will explain the formulas for:
1. the mean
2. the variance
3. and a fun link between both ๐Ÿงต

Keep reading to find out more! ๐Ÿ‘‡
Let's get warmed up by reviewing the definition of the mean or average of our data.
The variance formula looks a lot like taking an average but it's the average of the distance from the mean squared.
Read 10 tweets
23 Feb
As a non-American living in America, during a pandemic, I'm both awed and horrified by this country's reverence for work.
When most people around the world talk about work-life balance, they mean *quality* of life vs hours of work. Here in America, the trade off seems to be about years off your actual life.
HALF A MILLION Americans are dead because of this pandemic and as far as I can tell a huge number of Americans are OK with this. They would rather talk about the weather.
Read 13 tweets
22 Feb
I've worked in a lot of different sciences and what I've discovered is that each science is its own slightly bizarre alternate reality where the scientific method turned out differently.
People say you're entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts. But I need you to hear this: every science has its own facts. And I don't want to freak you out but they don't even agree on what a "fact" actually is.
The scientific method relies on the answers to questions like 'what is evidence'? Sciences are free to answer these questions in their own way and to define their own scientific method.
Read 14 tweets
19 Feb
You may have heard "IQ is about 50% heritable". What you need to know is that by the same logic, "Experiencing Racism" is also heritable. A dark-skin man is likely to experience racism and his kids are likely to experience similar levels of racism to him.
If that man had children with someone white, their children's tendency to experience racism would be intermediate between both parents. Identical twins raised apart are likely to experience similar levels of racism.
Fraternal twins would be less likely to experience similar levels of racism than identical twins. Every pattern that we would normally look at to figure out if something is genetic would say "experiencing racism" is inherent and genetic.
Read 5 tweets
17 Feb
Some people follow me for my statistics insights. Other people like me for my social commentary. This thread explains how those things are related. ๐Ÿ‘‡
A lot of people don't understand statistics. Statistics is critical thinking with numbers. In statistics, the goal isn't to use numbers for the sake of using numbers. It's to use numbers in service of revealing the truth.
As a statistician, I believe it is my duty to not blindly follow the numbers but it's also my duty to fairly consider what numbers can tell us about the truth of things. It falls on statisticians to sit in this in-between place and hold space.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!