Questions about the Johnson & Johnson vaccine? In this post, I describe the composition of the vaccine, the clinical trial results, and how it compares to the other vaccines in use. Also at #virologyblog. (1/n)

virology.ws/2021/03/04/one…
On February 27, 2021, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization for a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The vaccine was developed by Janssen Pharmaceutica, a Belgium-based division of Johnson & Johnson, in collaboration with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. (2/n)
Perhaps the most exciting feature of this new vaccine is that it only requires one dose to be effective in inducing an immune response. (3/n)
The vaccine is named Ad26.COV2.S because it consists of a human adenovirus vector, with a DNA genome, into which has been inserted the gene that encodes the full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (pictured). (4/n)
This is similar to AstraZeneca’s vaccine, based on a different adenovirus, and with a slightly different version of spike, which is not yet authorized in the U.S. (5/n)
The notion of using a virus as a vector to deliver vaccines to humans is based on the ability of viruses to enter cells by attaching to host cell receptors and releasing their genome into the cell. (6/n)
Upon injection into a vaccine recipient, the vaccine vector should enter cells and serve as a code for host proteins to synthesize the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from the inserted gene. (7/n)
Ideally, the spike protein will then act as an antigen to prime the immune system to recognize SARS-CoV-2 if it infects the body at a later time. (8/n)
Adenoviruses are particularly suitable as vectors for delivering foreign genes into cells because they have a double-stranded DNA genome that can accommodate relatively large segments of foreign DNA, and because... (9/n)
...they infect most cell types without integrating into the host genome. However, because of the prevalence of adenovirus infections in humans, most people have adenovirus-specific antibodies that could bind and neutralize these vectors, thus rendering them... (10/n)
...less effective at stimulating antibodies to the inserted gene product. AstraZeneca circumvented this issue by using an adenovirus of chimpanzee origin that does not normally infect humans. (11/n)
The adenovirus used to make Ad26.COV2.S (Adenovirus 26) is of human origin; however, when tested, most people have very few antibodies that inactivate this adenovirus, compared to antibodies against other adenoviruses. (12/n)
Thus, potential Ad26.COV2.S recipients are less likely to have pre-existing antibodies to the adenovirus vector itself. (13/n)
To optimize Adenovirus 26 for use as a vaccine vector, Janssen investigators deleted the gene that regulates viral replication, thus ensuring that the virus vector cannot cause an infection in human cells. (14/n)
During infection, the SARS-CoV-2 viral particle fuses with the host cell membrane; a process that is mediated by two main events: 1) a structural rearrangement of the spike protein from its pre-fusion conformation; and, 2) cleavage of the spike protein by a... (15/n)
...cellular enzyme called furin. Based on the knowledge that the pre-fusion, uncleaved form of spike is more stable and immunogenic... (16/n)
...Janssen investigators also inserted two mutations into the spike gene: one that locks the translated spike protein into its pre-fusion conformation, and one that prevents its cleavage by furin. (17/n)
The FDA’s decision to issue an emergency use authorization for Ad26.COV2.S was based on safety and efficacy data from an ongoing Phase III clinical trial done in 39,321 participants who received either a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S or a placebo control. (18/n)
The trial was randomized, meaning that participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group receiving the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine, or the control group, so that the only expected differences between the experimental... (19/n)
and control groups were the outcome variables studied (safety and efficacy). Randomizing trial participants eliminates unwanted effects that have nothing to do with the variables being analyzed. (20/n)
The trial was also double-blinded, meaning that neither the investigators nor the subjects knew who was receiving a particular treatment. Double-blinding leads to more authentic conclusions because they reduce researcher bias. (21/n)
The basic findings of the trial were as follows:

- side effects related to vaccination were mild to moderate; and the vaccine was... (22/n)
* 66% effective at preventing moderate to severe COVID-19 across all geographic areas and age groups (U.S., South Africa, and six countries in Latin America);

* 72% effective at preventing moderate to severe COVID-19 across all age groups in the U.S.; (23/n)
* 85% effective at preventing severe disease; and

* 100% effective at preventing COVID-19-related hospitalization and death as of day 28 after vaccination. (24/n)
The apparently reduced efficacy of Ad26.COV2.S compared to the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines has led to considerable public skepticism. However, this is an unfair comparison for several reasons. (25/n)
Ad26.COV2.S was tested at a time when more variants were in circulation, including in places where the Moderna/Pfizer vaccines are thought to be less effective against locally circulating variants. (26/n)
Some limited data also suggest that Ad26.COV2.S might protect from asymptomatic infection and may thus prevent transmission from vaccinated individuals to non-vaccinated individuals. (27/n)
Although there is some evidence to suggest that the Pfizer vaccine has a similar effect, no such data exist yet for the Moderna vaccine. (28/n)
The most critical measure of a vaccine’s efficacy is how well it prevents severe disease, hospitalizations, and deaths, and in this regard, all three vaccines are comparable. (29/n)
Moreover, Ad26.COV2.S has at least two advantages over the Pfizer/Moderna vaccines: 1) it does not require a freezer and can be stored in a refrigerator for up to three months; and, 2) it can be administered in a single dose. (30/n)
This will increase vaccine uptake, because people won’t have to get two shots and/or remember to get the second shot. It also makes it easier to immunize people with limited access to healthcare, such as the homeless and people living in remote areas. (31/32)
When all these factors are considered together, it is clear that Ad26.COV2.S will be a crucial additional tool in the fight against this pandemic. (end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gertrud Rey PhD (Trudy)

Gertrud Rey PhD (Trudy) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GertrudRey

21 Feb
There is currently a resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite the fact that about 76% of the population had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, which would normally lead to herd immunity. What is the cause of this resurgence? Short Thread. (1/n)
The truth is, nobody knows, but there are at least four mutually exclusive possibilities: (2/n)
1) The attack rate could have been overestimated during the first wave, meaning that the population remained below herd immunity. Attack rate is the percentage of an at-risk population that contracts the disease during a specified time interval. (3/n)
Read 5 tweets
20 Feb
As more and more people are vaccinated, one of the major questions is whether or not the vaccines protect only from disease, or both from disease and infection. Short thread. (1/n)
Even if they completely prevent disease in a vaccinated person, there is a chance that that person can still become infected, replicate virus to a certain extent, possibly to a sufficient level to infect another (unvaccinated) person. 2/n)
The studies analyzing this feature of SARS-CoV-2 immunity are well under way. Here are results from one such study from Israel, which is ahead of the rest of the world in the vaccination process. (3/n)

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 5 tweets
7 Feb
Vaccines, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibodies.

What is the difference between these three things and what do they have in common? A thread. (1/n)
The major shared feature is that they all involve the action of antibodies, but the source of the antibodies and their durability is vastly different. (2/n)
Vaccines present or lead to the presentation of an antigen (e.g., a piece of a virus) that induces your immune system to make your own antibodies. Those antibodies stay in your body for a long time and are affiliated with an immune memory that lasts even longer. (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
7 Jan
What is in your mRNA vaccines and why could they be made so quickly? A thread, also at virology blog. (1/n)

virology.ws/2021/01/07/rna…
It is now a little more than a year since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, and we already have several highly effective vaccines against this virus. (2/n)
Because of my previous research experience in vaccine science, I was very skeptical about the promise of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine this soon. I was wrong, and I could not be happier about that. (3/n)
Read 32 tweets
20 Dec 20
What are bioRxiv and medRxiv? They are servers where anybody can self-publish a scientific article. Legitimate journals put a submitted research paper through pretty rigorous peer review, but the publications on these "preprint" servers are not peer reviewed. Thread. (1/n)
As you might imagine there can be quite a bit of junk on there, including the paper that has been making headlines, allegedly showing that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed and integrated into the human genome. (2/n)
The conditions under which these experiments were done were extremely artificial, where probably just about any RNA would have been reverse transcribed and integrated. But the authors didn't show that. (3/n)
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov 20
Several people have expressed concern over the Pfizer/Moderna vaccines because of their mRNA composition and the alleged possibility that this mRNA could integrate into our DNA and remain in our DNA forever (kind of like HIV does). Short threat about why this can't happen. (1/n)
I attach a graphic that illustrates the central genetic dogma. Generally, our human DNA is transcribed into RNA (red arrow), which is then translated into protein (green arrow). (2/n)
HIV is an RNA virus that goes against this dogma and is “reverse transcribed” into DNA in the cytoplasm of our cells after it enters our cells, using an enzyme called “reverse transcriptase” (straight yellow arrow). (3/n)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!