If Tories nakedly give public money to those who vote Tory they'll outrage those who think public money should go to those in need but the electorate will get the message, helped by the outraged sharing it, that if they want money they should vote Tory.
It's not that dissimilar to awarding huge public contracts to Party donors and associates. Yes, it's a disgraceful abuse of public money. But nevertheless businesses that want huge public contracts will learn they need to donate to the Tory party and employ current/ex Tory MPs.
It's not clear to me how you resolve this problem. What we dignify with the description 'constitution' isn't much more than an unenforceable agreement to abide by the rules of cricket. And if you decide you want to bowl bodyline there's not really anything to stop you.
We, of course, mostly out of sheer stubbornness, will continue pushing back but I don't have any real sense that the British Establishment is up for grappling in any meaningful way with what seems to me to be happening.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

26 Feb
Published today: almost £19m of contracts to Wernick Buildings Limited for work that started on 21 September but the contract for which was concluded only eight days ago. atamis-1928.cloudforce.com/sfc/p/#0O00000…
Its directors include David Mark Wernicke. …te.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/004144…
S Wernicke & Sons (Holdings Limited) is its immediate parent company.
Read 4 tweets
25 Feb
The personal attacks from @Jacob_Rees_Mogg won't make the scrutiny of his Government's misspending go away. They reveal merely how much his Government abhors what scrutiny represents.
On the plus side, Jacob's personal attacks have given a nice boost to our crowdfunding. crowdjustice.com/case/108millio…
This is how this Government reacts to private citizens who speak truth to power. Not by responding on the substance - because they cannot. But with personal attacks. Just like every ugly demagogue from history. They shame England. They shame our democracy.
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
Such a good piece. Transparency isn't transparency if everything you need to see to know nothing dodgy has happened has been blacked out.

If they have nothing to hide why will they not let us see? metro.co.uk/2021/02/23/mat…
(Also very pleased to see a rare appearance in print of @gem_abbott, our Legal Director. She has been targeted here by a number of those who call themselves 'feminist' but hate us for our work on trans rights. This is as good a moment as any to give the facts of her appointment.
I appointed her to work one or two days a week, freelance, when @GoodLawProject had only one employee. I had no prior personal connection with her at all. None. She had come to my attention through her work on period poverty with @free_periods which involved law and campaigning.
Read 5 tweets
21 Feb
The publication of politically sensitive contracts was delayed for many, many months. Hancock's officials were asked by Number 10 to delay publication to help with press handling. Those are the facts (see eg Pestfix contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/notice/8f2e317…). Image
Their breaches of the law would have been even more serious had @GoodLawProject not sued. That's what the Court found. Image
And here's the evidence that DHSC was asked to delay publication. goodlawproject.org/update/civil-s…
Read 5 tweets
19 Feb
Italy is investigating corruption but we aren't. on.ft.com/3qBmVCL
In Italy they call it "illicit". But in the UK we institutionalised it with a VIP lane into which Government Ministers introduced their associates, often without recording that they had done so, or why.
You don't believe me? Here is what the NAO said. But I don't understand any of our fraud agencies to be taking the remotest interest. Perhaps they're afraid of being embarrassed by what they uncover.
Read 5 tweets
16 Feb
When we are told we are more impactful than the Opposition we are not cheered by the compliment, or critical of the Opposition, we are alarmed by the Government's success in reducing Parliament to an irrelevance.
Politically appointed regulators, a dominant and tame state news agency, the use of public money for Party purposes, a civil service neutral only in name, and an irrelevant Parliament is pretty close to a prescription for the end of democracy.
The Law Lord, Devlin, captured the innate conservatism of the judiciary in his description of them as a "body of elderly man who have lived on the whole unadventurous lives… old-fashioned in their ideas." But even they are likely to be further reigned in by this Government.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!