3mos is basically about as fast as you can ram one through...
...but the Ack SPAC is whale hunting and whatever they hope to buy would be a massive transaction ($4bn in trust, plus a big committed PIPE).
Complexity + size = increased time to close.
Today is Mar 5. These options expire in mid-June.
unless Ackman announces a deal in the next 3 weeks, I think it's basically impossible for him to close this transaction before these options expire...
....meaning you get paid 80c (against whatever you have to put up to sell the put, at my broker, ~$2/share), to commit to get long $20 worth of cash at $20.
This is a 40% RoIC for 3.5mos work. With very little risk (beyond mark to market on the puts).
Keep in mind also that as the market goes lower/gets wobbly the odds of doing a deal GO DOWN, not up. So the value of this put should be going down...
The put leg here is MASSIVELY misunderstood and misplaced. Below $20/share in the next few months you're shorting a cash box...
...who wouldn't mind getting long a bunch of cash and then just redeem?
You get paid 40% ROIC to do this. Yes its not scalable. Yes you need to wear mark-to-market. Yes this is options to if you didn't understand even a word of this thread, its NOT FOR YOU.
DYODD always...
...but if none of that applies, this seems highly compelling and (to me) the best risk-adjusted way to play the current SPAC meltdown.
Let Ack's cash box pay you 40% ROICs in a few months. Then go on summer vacay w the proceeds before he even announces a deal ππ
GLTA π
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Running hedge m2m losses through OCI. I saw zero comment on this post $HUM.AX annual numbers. Humm hedges interest rates to protect their NIM and the accounts make it clear that hedges in the accounts are 'effective' - which means simply every $ of hedge losses is offset...
...by gains on the asset side over the life of the hedge. hence you don't run hedge mark-to-market losses (or gains) through the income statement; instead you just run them through OCI.
Importantly these cash flow hedges cost $53mm - only through OCI - to $HUM.AX in FY25...
$EDU.AX stock has doubled in two months since this. 1H results - announced this AM - make it clear why mgmt/insiders tried to steal this via delisting a cpl of mos ago...
biz is now run-rating $21mm in EBITDA, $12.5mm in net income, and has $21mm net cash...
At 16.5c per share (the supposedly 'fair' buyback px) the implied mkt cap was $25mm π€£π€£
Moving on to what the co is worth...
Key disclosure today is the biz appears not to have even peaked...mgmt saying rev growth in 2H will more than offset cost growth...
Given enrolments are still actually growing + the avg course is 3-4yrs now, it is quite likely imo that FY26 (next yr) is just as profitable, if not more so, than current year...
If we run that through the PnL you get something like this:
Given (I believe) TFG owns (at mids) 4.5mm shs of Ripple Labs, I think they are marking their Ripple shs at about $53/share (a big discount to private market transactions, given liquidity, etc).
At $175/share - the px of this tender - the TFG stake is worth $547mm OVER the...
...current mark. You need to tax this for mgmt fees (say 20%) but even so this is $438mm - or, $5.4/share of excess value above NAV.
Ie true NAV today is more like $40-41 and the stock is $14.
Ok this is topical as the buyer, Cosette, filed notice to Terminate so stock now off 12% at $4.2...
TL;DR is I have reversed my view, I think this is an exceptional R/R here given px now below original pre-deal px despite fully papered terms at $7.4...
Let's start w/ what I got wrong in the original thread (and why I think its important now). I orig thought that the precise quantification - $10.76mm in EBITDA - as the quantum for MAC definition was problematic for Mayne (the seller).
However since the orig allegation...
...Cosette has still not attempted to quantify any of the events they solely/collectively determined to be a MAC. It appears - judging from the PR from $MYX.AX just now - they have filed at least two sep comms to the company - May 17; and June 4 - w/ no attempt to quantify the MAC...
Now that EDU Holdings $EDU.AX has bowed to the inevitable and abandoned a highly flawed delisting attempt, I can speak broadly about this exciting investment.
Note I own >9% of the company, and all the below represents solely my own opinion. Always DYODD. This is not advice.
$EDU.AX is a for-profit education business in π¦πΊ. After many yrs in the wilderness, their core biz, Ikon (provides higher education certificates, mostly to international students), started growing like a weed last year:
(NB: there are three terms at Ikon, hence T1, T2, etc). The rebound in students followed extensive restructuring of the course offering, to focus on long-term needs (nursing, early childcare education, finance/accounting, etc) and ofc the lean post-COVID yrs...
Let's update a couple of investments/themes. 1) Aircraft lessors. As expected snap back has been quick but $AL has outperformed $AER.
Still think $AL is the better bet here, given rel val (0.78x vs 1.15x P/B); likely nt catalyst (bback, potential wholeco sale), even if extant RoEs etc still lag for another 18mos.
Have shifted most all my exposure of these two to $AL. Note that $AER is closing in on 10yr highs re P/B...
Still think another 10-15% upside nt in $AER but easy $$ has been made.
Ofc $AVAP.LN remains v cheap, structurally mispriced, you can look up my old tweets but thats a diff bucket/size/liquidity etc.
2) $PAC.AX. Stock has not recovered post buyback but has never been cheaper (well, not lately). Here are the updated numbers. 27% discount to PF NAV, w/ $9.25 of NAV in very hard value: