THREAD: A SWAT team decimated this innocent woman's home while chasing a fugitive. The city says it's not their problem—and has refused to pay for any damages.
The story: A man barricaded himself inside the home of 76-year-old Vicki Baker, whose daughter gave police the keys & a garage door opener.
Instead, agents used explosives to blow off the garage entry, and drove right on through the front door in an armored vehicle.
The city quickly told her that they don't owe her anything under the 5th Amendment & that she's not a victim.
"I've lost everything," she told me. She is battling cancer & was looking forward to retirement. So much for that.
This story is a microcosm for the debate around police reform.
There's the SWAT response itself, which was more suited to a battlefield. There's the obvious constitutional violation. And yet again, there is no accountability.
This isn't the first time this has happened, & it likely won't be the last. In 2015, a SWAT team totaled an innocent family's $580k home in Colorado while chasing a shoplifting suspect.
Bad: Police expecting the public to just shut up & take it when their tactics leave the little guy thousands of dollars in debt.
Baker is suing.
She says she'd primarily like to see courts state the obvious: that the gov't shouldn't be able to blow up your house & cite "police power" to get off the hook.
Dare to dream.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Whitmer's April stay-at-home order prohibited all public and private gatherings. It banned the in-store sale of paint & outdoor goods at big retailers. It shuttered lawncare services. It made it illegal to use motorboats, but not boats without motors. reason.com/2020/04/13/mic…
Even with all the prohibitions, lottery sales were still deemed essential.
THREAD: Yet another rogue cop received qualified immunity yesterday.
The judge writing for the majority didn't actually want to grant it. He was forced to, and he had some choice words for everyone involved. It’s a stunning opinion.
The case surrounds a cop, Nick McClendon, who pulled over a man, Clarence Jamison, to conduct a drug search, which resulted in damage to Jamison's car. McClendon told Jamison he’d received a call that he had “10 kilos of cocaine.”
McClendon never actually received that call.
But McClendon proceeded to search anyway for almost two hours, because why not? He even called in a canine, because why not?
No drugs were found, because Jamison is not, in fact, a drug dealer. But McClendon did manage to cause $4,000 in damages to Jamison’s vehicle.