"To get viewers you need to make your stream like X person's stream!"
Remember: The viewers who LIKE that style are ALREADY watching X person. You think they're going to suddenly start watching you?
Be yourself. Have fun. Assume you'll have no viewers.
If people show up? That's a bonus. If ENOUGH people show up that you can potentially make cash off it? Congrats! You are both good at it AND super lucky.
Now you have a job. One that demands long hours, a LOT of dedication and dealing with people who want you to fail or change.
I loathe and avoid these interview questions. Because they carry a lot of hidden assumptions. The interviewee has to parse the "shadow question" lurking within them. Not everyone can.
So, below are things co-panelists have told me they want from these Qs over the years:
This is intended to get you to talk freely about something you are passionate about. It is not there to establish a particular work skill, but to see how you approach things you enjoy.
In some workplaces, it's also to determine cultural 'fit'. If the office is full of people who like doing outdoors things, or the boss is big on them and the company does lots of outdoorsy away days, then they're hoping for someone to say "oh i go hiking/surfing/whatever"
There are few things more surprising than a cold, wet kitty nose to the back of the knee. Particularly when you are unaware there is a kitty in the house.
"I am here. You have been informed."
"Snooze now. Wake me up when you feed the sparrows."
1) Own a car 2) Be ABLE to drive a car 3) Learn how to do it 4) Pass a test
I'm always FASCINATED how, culturally, keeping this as affordable as possible has become seen as of greater (not equal) importance than keeping public transport affordable.
Like, not raising fuel tax is seen as a massive victory for "the person on the street".
Yet any discussion about freezing public transport fares is INSTANTLY shot down as being to the benefit of a subset of people only, and somehow laughable economics.
It's not either/or. If you need to freeze transport costs to alleviate pressure on people's pockets, or to stimulate economic growth. If THAT'S your excuse. Then you freeze both road AND rail costs to the end user.
Collaborating on content does not require every single collaborator being able to edit the sodding webpage.
It's a website, not a buffet. Collaborate first then pick one person to copy paste the text in.
Here endeth today's lesson on HE departmental web bullshit requests.
Having permissions to edit a university webpage is not a valid way of improving your sense of self worth, or a way of rewarding your staff.
The university website is not a substitute for therapy or promotion.
Here endeth today's second lesson HE departmental web bullshit.
The likelihood of a department blaming a governance failure on another department CUBES when you add a new department as owner to a website section. Not doubles.
2 owners? 8x the risk. 3 owners? 27x the risk.
Here endeth today's third lesson on HE departmental web bullshit.
Lyn Macdonald was an absolute TITAN of WW1 history.
Indeed I can honestly say that I owe my passion for that period in part to her. Discovering her books as an undergrad opened my eyes to the complex narrative of WW1, beyond the myths. It was life-changing.