Oh hey! There's a Vancouver Park Board meeting about to start. You _might_ want to mute this thread. #VanParkBoard
"The meeting will being shortly". Sigh, not even any smooth jazz to keep us entertained. #VanParkBoard
Committee meeting first, acknowledgements of International Women's Day.
(I need to take a kid to a class, there will be a pause in live tweeting. Hopefully nothing interesting happens. Also, my audio keeps cutting out. :( )
And I'm back! What did you miss? A report out about the Bright Lights non-event at Christmas time and the pivot to airing the train ride online. $9k raised for the Burn Fund through donations. #VanParkBoard
Now we're on the surprisingly controversial Vancouver Urban Food Forest at Burrard View Park in Grandview-Woodlands. Staff is reporting out... #VanParkBoard
A 10 minute recess has been call for what I assume is an "energy drink break" for the Commissioners. #VanParkBoard
It has been 50% longer than 10 minutes. Do we really need to make this meeting stretch *longer*? There must be an awful lot of Red Bull being consumed.
Speaker #7 is just starting. #6 (also in favour) started just as I was leaving.
#7 starts by talking about finding needles on the blvd where he lives. Wanders around a little bit but turns out he's ... oh, I think he's also for this project.
Commissioner Dumont reveals Group A consists of TWENTY-FIVE speakers and that given the time, extend the meeting to accommodate all these speakers.
Group B (how many) will be called tmrrw.
Not sure what this means for the Regular PB Meeting (this is just the ctte) #VanParkBoard
Surprisingly, Commissioner Coupar doesn't want to hear from all Group A speakers tonight (but? what about hearing from the public?) and challenges the motion as being out of order. Doesn't matter, motion carries over NPA objections.
Reminder: When Commissioners Coupar and Barker argue there shouldn't be a temporary bike lane in one of the two travel lanes in Stanley Park due to loss of accessible parking spots, they're talking about *2* spots.
And blaming the temporary bike lane on parking revenue loss is ... grasping at straws. Parking in Stanley Park was never full when the temporary lane was in place last summer
In fact, it's been speculated that the drop in cars in the park was, in part, because those two Commissioners couldn't stop saying "Stanley Park is closed" and "there's no parking" during that time -- when it was measurably not the case.
I call on the Park Board Commissioners to reconsider the removal of the temporary protected active-transportation lane. What problem does the removal solve? What are the consequences of the removal?
Problems that it solves:
* More convenient access to Brockton Point and Third Beach for people who drive to Stanley Park
* Allowing people who drive more convenient access to/from the Causeway
Problems that it *doesn't* solve:
* Improved parking in the park (not at capacity)
* Improved access in the park (will *remove* 2 accessible spots if it reverts back to pre-COVID)