I was annoyed that the CDC wasn't giving useful guidance about what to do if you're vaccinated, and then they gave guidance on Monday. It's pretty good! But it's going to need to be loosened again very soon. businessinsider.com/cdc-new-post-v…
The most important thing about this guidance is it makes clear vaccinated people can drop the masks and distancing in gatherings with unvaccinated people under certain circumstances. This gives vaccinated elderly people permission to hug their grandkids. businessinsider.com/cdc-new-post-v…
The new guidance tells you very little about how vaccines change what you can do in public places, and they'll need to say more on that soon, especially since the CDC already acknowledges the need for risk-mitigation (rather than just abstinence) guidance about restaurants.
What would I have the CDC do? They already give restaurant risk-mitigation tips like ask for individual salt packets instead of handling the salt shaker. I would add things like "try to postpone restaurant meals until after your vaccination is effective." cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
This is an area where the CDC is treating the public like adults, telling them not just what it thinks is the best practice, but also what will reduce risk if you don't follow that best practice. The vaccine adds new scenarios to give such advice about.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is office politics, framed in such a way as to induce news coverage.
All this hall monitor nonsense is quite damaging to the image of the press, I think. We tell people what we do is highlight important information and people see us causing trouble for random people over their old statements. (Remember this?) washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/09…
Why is Scott Gottlieb the only person who seems to be any good at talking about our imminent (but not yet here) ability to go back to normal because of vaccines? businessinsider.com/texas-covid-re…
In particular, this 90-day nonsense is driving me crazy and it’s now feeding into policies Andrew Cuomo is setting in New York. businessinsider.com/texas-covid-re…
Texas and Mississippi are lifting restrictions irresponsibly early. But if you want to convince people (officials or members of the public) not to normalize now, you need a story about when they can, and it can't be "maybe by Christmas, mope mope mope" businessinsider.com/texas-covid-re…
eBay has a pre-existing policy against "Items with racist, anti-Semitic, or otherwise demeaning portrayals, for example through caricatures or other exaggerated features, including figurines, cartoons, housewares, historical advertisements, and golliwogs"...
there is an exception for "Media such as historical photos, magazines, books and art, provided that such material doesn't perpetuate or glorify violence, intolerance or racial stereotyping," which I'm not entirely sure how you apply.
For example, you can sell a copy of Mein Kampf on eBay. Does the question of whether a book "perpetuate[s]... intolerance" depend on the buyer's likely use for the book rather than the author's intent?
This doesn't seem like a way to sell business attire. So this image suggests to me that Suitsupply thinks the initial surge in sales of dressy attire will be for the return of social functions, not business meetings.
"time to put on a suit and look sexy again." I could imagine worse pitches.
I am an outsider to straight culture but my understanding is that one thing single straight people like about weddings is they are a good opportunity to have casual sex, yes?
“Democrats ought to care much more about winning races in R+5 states and much less about whether their nominees adhere to the cultural values of urban college graduates.“
Matt has some good suggestions on how Democrats can run a little better in tipping-point states by giving some ground on zero-stakes cultural politics questions, like Obama used to do. slowboring.com/p/win-elections
But anyway what *I* conclude from Matt’s observation that many Democrats go on about how Republicans are an existential threat to democracy but are unwilling to give even rhetorical ground to win a higher vote share is they don’t believe their “existential threat” talking points.