10 years as a full-time carer 24/7 for my mother and I just managed to stay afloat and no more. However, this pandemic has now officially wiped me out - financially and mentally. It's just not sustainable.
The problem is, the UK treating the 2 million full-time carers the way they do (and the UK parliament), namely treating them like a slave labour force, keeping them on 1/3 of the income of public and private sector carers and building a health and social care system on their....
....backs, means that there's very little chance to escape if they wanted to - and at the same time, even if they did escape it would take years for them to recover financially if they ever did.
Think about a private or public sector carer getting burnt out. They can sign off sick or take a holiday. There will be a colleague to take their place. They also get days off and work shifts. Unpaid carers are the lowest paid "benefit claimants" (which is insulting....
....not from an income standpoint but because UK law actually deems carers as not being workers and therefore affords them no protection like paid carers) and they also have no rights to time off, shifts, proper remuneration - they don't even have the right to training!
And even if they do get outside support from local authorities, it is for a few hours a day where they get to have a nap. And there's always a caveat - like councils will assess them for two days but pay out at the wage level for their own staff....
...which doesn't account for the cost of the private care being £16 an hour rather than the £9 they pay their staff. Ergo that 2 days becomes 1 day (that's just one example).
The classic one with the UK Government is when they tell carers they can also take paid work. I say classic because it works like this. A carer (if they can get the time because most work 24/7) gets Carers Allowance which is classed as being too low as an income....
...so they also get UC or income support. It's roughly, all in about £115 a week. But then they have to pay for all their own PPE (unlike private and public carers whose employers buy it) and all of their living costs.
So say a carer does manage to somehow find time for a job. Income Support and UC are means tested. So pound for pound the person earns in that job, the DWP takes it off them. Once they reach a threshold over their income support or UC, the DWP then revoke their carers allowance.
So now what you've got is a carer looking after the person most of the time and working a parttime job, and all they get is the wage from that part-time job which is the equivelant of the benefits they used to get. Twice the work, half the remuneration.
The issue is that carers also don't have something important - they have no workers union and they also can't strike - because if they did, they'd be subject to criminal charges for abandoning the person they care for. Basically, they are state-sponsored hostages.
UK wide people clapped for carers for 5 minutes on a weekday at the start of this pandemic, but I note that they didn't spend 5 minutes email their MP's
Hundreds of thousands of carers haven't even had the £20 a week covid uplift that is on income support.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On the matter of the dismissive "pop-up party" comments that keep getting made by certain people. Two things I will say - AFI is not a standard party - it's an alliance of many under one name on the ballot paper.
The second thing is the term "pop-up" - that's a falsehood. The term pop-up literally means denoting an organisation that OPENS UP QUICKLY in a temporary location and is intended to operate for only a short period of time.
AFI did not "open up quickly". The team of AFI spent months and months before going for registration building processes and procedures, standing orders, and a massive chunk of the same infrastructure that major parties have.
The Scottish National Party could cut the UK Government off at the knees over legal action tomorrow if it wanted, by supporting the #peoplesas30. Or at the very least having their parliamentarians do it personally. Instead, they've chosen to stay silent on the very court case...
....which would not only ensure the Scottish Parliament could legislate for indyref 2 without Westminster consent, but also prove the legitimacy of their own bill, so when it goes to Holyrood, the UK Gov would have nothing to challenge.
Instead, they have chosen to remain silent, and are now advocating using taxpayers money to defend a challenge that would be unnecessary if they had backed the people's action. It's absolutely mental!
So here's what's going to happen next if the #PeoplesAS30 doesn't establish the right of Scotparl to legislate for a second referendum. Nicola will ask boris for a sec 30 again. He'll say no.
The SNP will then lay their bill before parliament and the UK Government will immediately challenge it preventing it from gaining royal assent.
Because it doesn't have royal assent, it wont be a law. The UK Government will use the time in court to modify laws at Westminster to undermine the bill and that will take it out of competency of the Scottish Parliament and we'll be stuck.
Em. Am I missing something (genuine question)? Because the pics I have seen are of a piece of black slate with some white writing on it about women rights. I'm assuming the slate intended to represent a gravestone and the name of the person being women's rights?
I'm only asking for peoples opinion on this because if that's inappropriate behaviour/vandalism, I am really in trouble because my first experience of politics was as a 5-year-old carrying a banner through the streets of hawick....
which was black cardboard in the shape of a coffin and it read in white writing "R.I.P Hawick, Dying due to Tory Cuts!" - So I am (and this isn't me being obtuse - I am genuinely asking) if I have missed something here? Can someone explain?
I'm just going to point out that with both leaders of both pro-indy parties now confirming legal challenge of the referendum bill by Westminster is likely if its constitutionality without a section 30 order remain in doubt; and testing that in court being, in Patrick Harvie's...
...own words "a perfectly legitimate approach to take". - Why then has no politician put their neck on the line to test it - because this mere pleb has - taking a year of abuse I might add AND facing financial ruin to do it.
I really don't think I am out of line to say that parliamentarians are missing something - a spine!
Good Morning Scotland! Good Morning World! Good Morning GCHQ! We start today with an article about the greens which simultaneously made my left eye twitch and also ended up me pebble dashing my PC monitor with my cup of tea. Thread 👇
For the eagle-eyed 10,000 backers of the #PeoplesAS30, your eyelid may also now be twitching. "We'll test the matter in court" to "legislate without a section 30"...... This is literally the point of the Peoples Action - to establish that it is legal for Holyrood to legislate...