Side note, there's another bill that would expand allocations for more lawmakers to get reimbursed for work trips.
Rep. Sommers just successfully an amendment to ban reimbursements for trips to partisan events, like CPAC.
One voted against, but not sure who. Voice vote.
The entire thing failed to advance despite impassioned advocacy from Rep. Zwonitzer, who said he wanted this for opportunities to attend conferences for LGBTQ lawmakers as a means to connect with legislators from other states he can relate better with.
Now onto the membership bill.
"The membership should reflect what the body is," Laursen said.
Basically the minority party's share of the Mgmt Council membership would drop by one member in the House until they achieve a threshold of 30%. Senate could follow.
This has been a recurring issue over the years... I remember covering a bill like this before my first session.
Now that we have a libertarian in the mix, Sommers asks how we'll handle those guys.
Laursen said they're so few in number, not a big worry right now.
Rep. Pat Sweeney testifying. Said he remembered a meeting where the Senate walked out and, if senators of the minority party didn't back the House side, they could have lost their position.
Said he feels like a minority party now (as a Republican) and they need those voices.
"I fear we may be headed down a pathway where... Sometimes, moderate voices should be heard and valued, even if I'm not seen that way by the conservative majority."
Yin said he looked at the original legislative intent of Mgmt Council from the 1971 session law, when the body was founded. (Alongside LSO)
Said if we make a supermajority possible, you make it that the majority party can urge LSO to withhold resources from the minority party.
Connolly said the council was not set up like a committee for a reason, and that this bill has repeatedly failed because there's a recognition there is a strong minority voice in that group.
"I urge you to reject this. It's working."
Zwonitzer rejects that notion. Said that history has seen a minority member push for a change in the numbers just because she wanted to be on it, and that when it was founded, the body was much more bipartisan than it once was.
Bill advances. 9-3.
Nos: Connolly, Yin, Barlow.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
But yeah, this really underscores how tight our budget situation is. When the group that broadcasts your public meetings is a "want," you're really up against it.
"I didn't come to do the people's work so people couldn't see what I was doing," says @Provenza4Wyomin against the amendment.
"We have touched the point to where we're reaching into those we care most about but we don't have the answer because we are simply out of money," he said. "It's our problem, it's our responsibility, but everyone now realizes the problem we're in."
This is an informational meeting, but a lot of longer-term Senators are preaching about the deep impacts of the cuts they are considering on seniors, especially.
They know the problem but, as we were told last week, they'll cut til they find the floor.
Baldwin said we seem to be dropping further off, rather than replacing what we took away. And getting worse.
"What will we do if we cut too far this time?" asked Baldwin. "We can't fix those lives, so I guess... what will we do? That's the question."
Sitting in House Corps where they're hearing 4 bills to reform the ability to issue health orders.
Various degrees of severity, sponsorship.
HB98 Public health orders-reforms.
HB113 Public health orders-limitations.
HB127 Public health amendments.
HB56 Public health orders-2.
HB-98 -- sponsored by Rep. Gray -- turns state health officer into Senate confirmed position, can be removed, governor has to sign all health orders. Legislature would ratify orders. wyoleg.gov/Legislation/20…
HB-127 basically removes immediate actions -- i.e. quarantining sick individuals -- from legislative oversight.
"Political decisions" -- in this case, passing a mask mandate, limiting travel for many, etc. -- for longer than 10 days would be subject to approval by state/local.
If you don't understand the budget, I recommend you tune into the floor sessions right now. House and Senate are currently walking through the bill now.
House here:
Senate:
For an eye-popping statistic... with this proposed supplemental budget, Nicholas said we'll have cut roughly $1 billion from government in five years.
We know the House is going to attempt to put about $50 million back into the budget due to improving projections for minerals -- we undervalued oil in the last CREG by more than $10 a barrel.
The Senate is likely not on-board with that. Will have a piece out on that later.