Many moons ago, I was serving at a church that had to fire the lead pastor for a variety of disqualifying behavior, including short-temperedness and verbal/emotional abuse of staff. I remember hearing something important in a "house meeting" where explanations were being made
The elders were recounting years (plural) of working with the pastor in pleading with him to repent, to get help with his anger issues, etc. When they fielded questions from congregation, one person asked why this process had to be so "official."
Why, they asked, didn't someone approach him as a friend and talk to him without threats about his job or whatever. The elder responding to the question said something that has stuck with me to this day. He said, "Pastor _______ doesn't really *do* friendship."
That was significant to me then, but is even more so to me today. I have seen the importance not just of the accountability of ministers from the congregation and of course fellow elders, but of *being known.* Having friends.
Real Christian friendship can indeed mitigate so many relational deformities and even disqualifying patterns of behavior among leaders, if only for the reason that sin tends to flourish in isolation.
But "doing friendship" also forms us to be -- for lack of a better phrase -- normal people. Of course, it's not the only solution to abusive leadership -- lots of jerks have buddies, after all -- but...
I have come to be wary of all kinds of leaders, people with public ministries, etc. who don't appear to have close friendships. Not just acquaintances, not just fellow tribespeople, not just people they interact with online -- but friends.
And I think the growing epidemic of loneliness especially among men -- middle-aged men in particular -- is a big part of this, as well. Real friendships are formative, domesticating, normalizing. Christian friendships are primary points of discipleship beyond information transfer
A lot more to say on this subject, and I have dedicated a chapter to the subject in an upcoming book and have a blog post brewing, as well.
But I don't think it's an overstatement to say that leaders who operate from isolation are unhealthy and have a greater tendency to spread unhealthy ideas and behavior, as well. (This may seem like a "well, duh" observation, but I think it's still worth stating.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jared C. Wilson

Jared C. Wilson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jaredcwilson

9 Dec 20
Thanks to all who engaged with this tweet, including the Reformed guys who called it “idiotic,” “eisegesis,” “racegesis” (?), and “a massive stretch.” I forgot the quotes and citation but this is actually a line from a John MacArthur sermon. gty.org/library/sermon…
FTR, I agree with Dr. Mac here. And you’ll have to forgive the “thou art the man”-ing here, but I was trying to conduct a little experiment about statements about race, about how we measure truth based more on approved or unapproved voices than the claims themselves.
A while way back I tweeted that the dispute between Paul and Peter recounted in Galatians was in part an issue about racism, and I got absolutely skewered. James White even torched me on the DL over it. Then I pointed out MacArthur made the same claim, and the criticism stopped
Read 4 tweets
21 Nov 20
“For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions” - 2 Timothy 4:3 // I think many of us have applied this danger in the modern age to prosperity preachers...
...and other “feel good” teachers (the inspirational moralists of the attractional church). And it *does* apply to the allure of those types. But not sure as many of us saw it applying to politicians and political pundits and social media conspiracists. But it most certainly does
Many professing believers are filling their ears with voices that simply tell them what they want to hear — affirming their grievances, confirming their suspicions, stroking their idols, stoking their anger.
Read 6 tweets
2 Sep 20
Many people have been church hopping this season because they didn't see joining a church in the first place as joining a family so much as a vibe. Having to meet different hours, different places, different ways -- that changes the vibe. So they're looking elsewhere.
We don't do family like that. Or we shouldn't. If Grandma said, "Next Thanksgiving we're gonna eat outside" we wouldn't find a new grandma. You could tell Grandma you don't like it. That you wish we could go back inside. But you're there Thanksgiving eating her food.
Don't treat church like a consumer product. Church is a family, not a club, a program, or a style preference.
Read 4 tweets
27 Aug 20
Excellent thread. I'm seeing this too and expecting more of it. I'm not a prophet or a son of a prophet, but I suspect there is a great refining going on right now -- even a pruning. It feels like a great brokenness. And it is. The angry people are finding their way out
As Dean mentions, there are (generally) two types and they are ending up at two kinds of places. For those not compelled to either side, it is tragic and can be discombobulating to feel "caught" in the middle. But this is preferable to "taking up arms" against the brethren
Make your appeals and entreaties, but you'll have to let indignant people go do their indignant thing with other indignant people. There they go to write that hit song "Alone in Our Principles." It's hard. But your church might actually be getting healthier as it "shrinks"
Read 6 tweets
16 Jul 20
One thing you notice from time to time as our most dedicated harassers, nitpickers, and revilers defend their "communication strategies" is an appeal to the harsh language of the Scriptures. "The Bible can be rude. So we can be rude" the thinking goes...
You will see them cite Paul's harsh rebukes of the Galatians, his sharpness about the Cretans, and so forth. Jesus turning over tables and running people out with a whip. There are no doubt numerous examples of harsh language from the holy -- from prophets to apostles...
There can be no doubt that strong words and godly rebukes are at times -- perhaps *many* times -- called for. The problem is that we also have numerous (to put it lightly) clear imperatives about how to speak to brothers and sisters. Not to mention warnings about the tongue...
Read 7 tweets
15 Jul 20
I do not claim to know all the ins and outs of Crist's offenses or his pursuit of repentance, but I am compelled to urge consideration of the huge problem we only compound when we equate restoration with restoration *to a platform.*
The rush to forgive fallen public figures is essentially good-hearted. But we can further harm victims *and* offenders by assuming re-platforming them is necessary to forgiveness.
I do think disqualified pastors can potentially be restored to the pastorate, but we rarely see it go well because we move too quickly, assuming we're not truly being gracious unless we open both the door to personal reconciliation and to a position of authority. But it's unwise
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!