In between sessions, I guest lectured in @WAndyKnight1 's global governance class to talk NATO stuff. The sharp student asked a lot of great questions. Nice to have them push me to think about stuff.
@WAndyKnight1 Hyten talks about the need for relationships.... once again military folks sounding like Oprah, but the dark side is: better to fight on someone else's territory
@WAndyKnight1 Hyten talks about China's weapons programs as threat to US, inferring that they are up to something.
BUT to be fair, Security Dilemma--maybe China wants a Triad to provide itself some security?
Oh my, what has happened on Wuhan? this has taken a turn
@WAndyKnight1 I do wonder if anyone will ask Hyten about any advice he got about handling sexual misconduct and abuse of power might be handy to share with Canadians
@WAndyKnight1 Hyten wants to return procurement to the 1950s--move things very fast, delegate to the lower levels. Um, good luck with that. #OttawaConference 33/x
@WAndyKnight1 asked about domestic terrorism, Hyten says Jan 6th hit him like a gutshot. Says the number of extremists in the force is miniscule but still serious.
He sees domestic terrorism as crime and it is law enforcement problem. #OttawaConference 34/x
@WAndyKnight1 Coming late to Jean Charest's talk. seems to be complaining that the governments have given people too much money. Not sure why this is his focus.
Not sure if I am having a hard time following Charest's argument or the translator is missing the transitions.
Curious: Charest is doing this entirely in French given he can do this in English. I am not criticizing, just noticing the contrast from his previous appearances
He calls Biden's $1.9 trillion aid package as industrial policy. I have to throw a flag
Charest answers a question with a tangent on immigration--that those who get labor mobility right will win. Immigration is not our enemy. That he says this in English is interesting--because this line may not play well in Quebec.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@sekreps@SheenaGreitens@MercedesGlobal Glad to get access and see @sekreps argue against fighting the last war, that we should not apply old lessons. And be wary of giving private sector much of the responsibility to deal with tech threats. #OttawaConference day 2 2/x
@sekreps@SheenaGreitens@MercedesGlobal SPNET's Kash Khorasani goes next and presents a lot of info that I can't summarize quickly here (I am still in post-class zoom fog).
Last year at this time, I was at Billy Bishop Airport, glowing from the success of the first CDSN Capstone and then hearing every sniffle and cough in the small airport. the sense of impending doom had changed to the sound of a wave crashing in the beach.
1/x
I called my wife and told her to stock up on food (wasn't thinking tp due to our costco stash) as it was unlikely that we were going to go to Hawaii to the ISA meeting in the weeks to come 2/x
I got home and we talked and started revising plans amid news about Tom Hanks and then the NBA. Somehow, the WHO declaring pandemic didn't resonate as much.
That was my last trip. And we pretty much haven't done anything social since then. Distancing all the way 3/x
I spending the next few days attending @CDAInstitute 's big Ottawa Conference on Security and Defence. A terrific program this year! I would love to see it in person but don't mind not having to dodge traffic to find parking near the Chateau Laurier. 1/x
@CDAInstitute I will live tweet on and off, depending on my ability to focus (the joy of zoom). I am especially looking forward to @sekreps, @SheenaGreitens and the other Brookings hotshots. Among the other highlights will be Jean Charest, who is a better speaker than most, 2/x
I wonder what @DMDND_SMMDN Jody Thomas will say and be asked as the Vance/McDonald/Sajjan stuff is hanging over all of this. LtG Eyre had to replace McDonald as speaker. 3/x
Back in the day, when I was at Texas Tech, I taught the required course of American and Texas Public Policy.
I started by defining the two ends of the spectrums for a democracy:
nightwatchman state that only focuses on international threats or ... Sweden.
The point? 1/x
That the US and, yes, Texas, would be someplace in between those extremes with lots of choices over different policies.
That markets work in very painful ways if not regulated. Sure, companies that make dangerous products will eventually go out of business as word gets out 2/x
but people have to get hurt for a company to get a reputation for being dangerous, for instance.
oh, and markets also fail and then what?
That collective action problems means that without someone or some group to provide public goods, they don't happen.
3/x
When a counter insurgency is successful, people think of the insurgents as mere criminals and don't really think that hard about the government's ability to sustain itself.
People don't like to securitize things like pandemics or such for a variety of reasons. However, when violent actors threaten to kill politicians, including the 2nd-3rd in line, well, it comes pre-securitized.
Which means we need to think a bit about the war ahead.