Yesterday, I bought $DGNS (Dragoneer’s 2nd SPAC) and $AGCB (Altimeter’s 2nd SPAC) at $10.65. Seemed pretty asymmetric at that price. 👇
Max downside is $0.65 per share (assuming you hold until deal announcement/SPAC expiry).
Upside is essentially a call option on tech froth or a good deal announcement.
On tech froth, Altimeter/Dragoneer SPACs have traded at $15+ pre-deal. That’s pure speculation, but if that happens again, the upside on the SPAC is almost 7x the downside.
The good deal announcement case is also pretty simple. Most tech IPOs in this market have been underpriced out of the gate. If these guys do a deal that is similarly underpriced, there is potential for it to rip to $15+ as well.
Even the deal is not underpriced, if it’s retail-friendly, retail could push the price way up. Many examples of this over the past year (Chamath’s SPACs, TRNE, etc.). Again, upside far greater than downside.
Quality of sponsors is pretty important here. Altimeter/Dragoneer brand names were the only reason their SPACs traded $15+ pre-deal, and brand name is theoretically what allows them to bring legit, quality companies public. I wouldn’t trust a less reputed sponsor to do that.
SPACs are also a bit of a "wild west" vs. traditional IPOs (way less regulated), making trust in sponsors even more important. Going w/ trustworthy sponsors is how you avoid a Clover Health type situation.
To be clear, this was a trade, not an investment, but I thought it was an asymmetric way to deploy excess cash that I won’t need for a few years.
At the current price, risk-reward is less clear. As always, do your own work and this is not investment advice.
You should also be aware that redemption for $10/share is only guaranteed if you wait until deal announcement/expiry. SPACs can trade below $10 in the interim, so if you need the money pre-expiry, you might take more than a 6% loss.
Any other SPACs run by ultra-high-quality sponsors that are trading below, at, or slightly above NAV? Closer to expiry, the better.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
$GDS reported earnings last night. It’s the leading carrier-neutral data center operator in China, and it’s a company I follow pretty closely. My takeaways from earnings, both the good and bad 👇
1/ First, a bit about the company: GDS operates in T1 cities in China (mainly, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou) where land & power for DCs within 100km of city center is very scarce.
2/ GDS customers (like BABA, Tencent, etc.) really want DCs near cities, since latency w/ end users is better.
The more I think about it, the more I think $ANGI mgmt is totally sandbagging their guidance for the size of fixed price (FP) in the future.
In other words, I think FP will be much bigger than they’re saying it’s going to be. Read why below:👇
1/ On the latest earnings call, CEO Brandon Ridenour guided towards FP being about half the overall business by revenue, 5-7 years from now.
2/ The thing is, FP is accounted for on a gross revenue basis while the traditional business is on a net revenue basis - so them being the same size by revenue would imply the traditional business being much bigger in terms of gross transaction value (GTV) over the platform.
I’ve been spending a lot of time learning about the online gambling space lately. To understand online gambling, though, I had to understand the "land-based" gambling ecosystem first.
There are many players - so explainer thread below👇
1/ There are two types of companies in gambling: B2C and B2B. B2C actually interface with end customers (gamblers). B2B provide products + services to B2C companies.
2/ We’ll start with B2C companies. In industry parlance, they're called "operators."
They are responsible for marketing to end customers, and in the offline world, actually operating the casinos, betting shops, racetracks, etc.
Why I think $JD is a $700bn+ company in 10 years (vs. <$150bn today).👇
This is a long thread and maybe not as exciting as watching $GME, but I think it'll be worth your time :)
1/ Chinese retail sales in 2020 were RMB ~40tn. 25% online = RMB ~10tn online sales. Let's say in 2030 total retail sales are RMB 70tn (inline w/ GDP growth) and online penetration is 50% = RMB 35tn online sales. That's 13% e-com mkt. size CAGR over next decade.
2/ JD's e-com mkt. share is ~20% today. What will their share be in 10 years?
1/ In his interview with @goodinvestingc, @CliffordSosin gives the best articulation of the 15-year investment case for $CVNA that I have seen. I'll summarize his argument for how $CVNA could be a $800B+ company in 15 years: 👇
2/ There are currently ~25m <10 yr-old used cars sold in US per year. Add in Canada + economic growth over time and you get to ~33m <10 yr-old cars/year in 2035. This is Carvana's TAM.
3/ Let's say $CVNA can get 1/3rd share. Seems high right? Well, across other industries, the leading retailer averages out to 1/3rd share. It's taken longer in autos since it's historically been such a fragmented + local business. 1/3rd share = 11m cars/year.