Last night, Tucker Carlson dedicated an entire segment to slamming @TaylorLorenz after she reported being relentlessly attacked, assuring another wave of harassment.
When protestors went to his house, the media breathlessly defended him on air for 2 weeks.
Where are they now?
When protestors went to his house, the media breathlessly defended him on air for 2 weeks.
Where are they now?
This is so common from Carlson that there’s an entire group of people that can show you a direct correlation between his segments and terrifying harassment.
Yet, when it happened to him (which we denounced), he was able to drive an entire news cycle on it.
Why is that?
Yet, when it happened to him (which we denounced), he was able to drive an entire news cycle on it.
Why is that?
We’re not seeing @CNN covering it, as they did with Carlson.
Or @washingtonpost writing features on it, as they did with Carlson.
We’re not seeing @StephenAtHome do a segment on it, as he did with Carlson.
Why is Carlson’s treatment of a female journalist different?
Or @washingtonpost writing features on it, as they did with Carlson.
We’re not seeing @StephenAtHome do a segment on it, as he did with Carlson.
Why is Carlson’s treatment of a female journalist different?
At the end of the day, the people who Carlson points his audience at don’t have the privilege that he has.
Or a security detail.
Or the ability to move homes when they’re harassed.
Or a security detail.
Or the ability to move homes when they’re harassed.
Carlson is a protected class in the media.
He’s got a big show.
A high profile.
And the ability to relentlessly attack the people with whom he disagrees with an audience ready to pounce.
Maybe the media is too scared to cover him because of reprisal.
He’s got a big show.
A high profile.
And the ability to relentlessly attack the people with whom he disagrees with an audience ready to pounce.
Maybe the media is too scared to cover him because of reprisal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
