She sounds like a nice white lady. She probably thinks she's doing her best with the "Blacks" who are "the lower ones". Even given the *most possible* benefit of the doubt here, she just doesn't have the cultural competency required to serve Black students equitably.
I don't have time right this second to investigate this. There is a lot of missing context here for me. But there is a thing we can see just from this clip. This woman is choosing to identify the Black students as somehow separate and distinct from other low performing students.
The person she's taking to didn't ask her to do that. It wasn't necessary in order to address low performance. She decided all on her own to call that into significance. Even before addressing any other factors. That is what white supremacy does.
Let me say it another way. Every college class has low performers. All white classes are going to have all white low performers. Only when Blackness is added to the equation does it become noteworthy. White supremacy prompts the question "is it because they're Black?".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot of people are working hard to convince themselves that it's okay to be part of the "mostly white people are getting the vaccine" statistic. Those same people are gonna be on here lamenting how awful that is when they are *in the fucking spreadsheet*.
I do a lot of moralizing on here. I try to be self-aware about it and not overdo it too much. What we've gone through with this virus is bound to be an extremely touchy subject. Because even the most privileged among us have been touched. And yet still, the impact is not the same
Talking about privilege was never about shame. These folks aren't listening. Never were. Joe Lonsdale is gonna create whatever rhetoric allows him to keep doing whatever the fuck he wants to do.
Also are we gonna talk about what's underneath "the advantages I got from an awesome family?" I'm sure Joe doesn't wanna talk about what those advantages actually were. (Hint: it wasn't hard work)
Unfortunately, this is likely to be effective rhetoric for many white people. White men in particular. They already feel they're "under attack". The way white people respond to conflict is to create a strawman and use that to reject the moral argument.
I hate to say it, but he's not wrong. If you allow the conversation to be framed solely by identity, they're gonna trip you up with this every time. Men like Greenwald are able to thrive by wrapping themselves in their axis of marginalization.
We have this problem within marginalized communities. When you try to hold Black men accountable for the homophobia and transphobia in our community, you have to contend with this kind of derailing and misdirection.
If you've ever been a man of color trying to talk to a problematic white woman, you've probably been there too. Most of us have some axes of privilege and some of oppression. Many people will take the rhetoric of social justice and use it to shield themselves from criticism.
I just watched the Notorious B.I.G. documentary on Netflix. It’s hard to describe the feeling of being transported back to your really formative years. The documentary is just okay. But thinking back on that era gives me so many feelings.
I was 13 when Ready To Die came out. That was one of the first albums I bought from the store with my own money. And this was back when the explicit lyrics label actually made it hard for kids to buy music.
I played that tape so much I wore it out. Bought another one. I still remember almost all the words almost 30 years later. I didn’t necessarily wanna be a rapper. But I was obsessed with the poetry. The imagery. To paint a picture with words.
I'm listening to the audiobook of Pedagogy of the Oppressed. It has a new introduction for the 50th Anniversary edition. The intro is a very good. It grounds the reading in today's world. And it discusses how the work has been co-opted and commodified since it's publishing.
This will be my third time with this text. The first time I couldn't understand it. I didn't have the vocabulary. The second time, it definitely changed me. But it is a dense read, and I wasn't able to internalize it. I'm hoping I get even more out of it this time around.
Audiobooks have been a huge shift for me in terms of reading difficult texts. I've been struggling with my ability to focus even before the pandemic, but greatly exacerbated by it. Audio allows me to listen and process without the same focus of visual reading.
Twitter spaces just showed up for me. It's interesting. I already think it'll have a different vibe and different usage then Clubhouse.
Twitter spaces works on Android, so a whole new set of people will have access. Also it has auto captions. So at least attempting to be more accessible than CH. But right now the captions are pretty bad. Can't keep up with the normal pace of speech.
The first twitter space I clicked on was full of a lot of people I recognize and like on here. CH still requires me to scroll through a bunch of questionable stuff I don't care about before getting to something decent.