@ChineseEmbinUS Human rights defender Yang Maodong, better known by his pen name Guo Feixiong (杨茂东,笔名郭飞雄), has been unreachable since the morning of January 29. He began an indefinite hunger strike at Shanghai’s Pudong International Airport, on January 28, after being
prevented from leaving the country to visit his critically ill wife in the United States. When Yang was prevented from leaving the country, he was told that he was under suspicion of “endangering national security”, yet he is currently not known to be under any criminal
investigation. Authorities had told Yang that they would only allow him to travel if he would first make an “agreement” with officials from the Ministry of Public Security in Hubei. It is not clear as to what the nature of the “agreement” is, but possibly a tactic to stop him
from continuing his human rights activism. According to international human rights law and standards, everyone is free to leave any country, including one’s own. Reasons for restrictive measures must be provided in the rare individual case and not merely based on a generic
allegation. As it is currently impossible to make contact with Yang Maodong, his health and safety may be at risk. One should always assume that anytime a prisoner is held incommunicado, or is disappeared, that they are being tortured, or worse.
China should allow Yang
Maodong to leave China and lift any arbitrary restrictions being imposed on him. It is cruel to prevent him from visiting his gravely ill wife.
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia I am outraged by the attack on the life of Aleksei Navalny and by his subsequent treatment by the Russian government. It would seem the top concern of the prosecutors should be in finding and bringing to justice everyone involved in his poisoning, from
whoever took actions to get the poison into his system up to whoever ordered, or approved, the attack. Instead, Mr. Navalny was arrested upon return to his county and sent to prison for two years and eight months for purported “violation of [his] probation terms”.
It seems
obvious to an outsider that the prosecution and imprisonment of Aleksei Navalny is politically motivated, with the goal being to silence him and end his peaceful activism. It is absurd that the “violation” consisted of Mr. Navalny's failure to report regularly to a probation
@NicolasMaduro@carlosvecchio General Directorate of Military Counter-Intelligence visited the headquarters of Azul Positivo, on 1/12/21. They arrested Johan León Reyes, Yordy Bermúdez, Layners Gutiérrez Díaz, Alejandro Gómez Di Maggio, Miguel Guerra Raydan, and Luis Ferrebuz.
Azul Positivo is a non-governmental and humanitarian organization that since 2004 works to promote inclusion, understanding and treatment to HIV+ patients, as well as sexually transmitted infections, diversity and sexual violence.
Since 2006, they have developed community-based projects in various towns and cities in Zulia State (Western Venezuela). Through their work, they have contributed to the work of state public health entities, such as the National Service of Medicine and Forensic Sciences,
@ChefGov_ma@morocco_usa Maati Monjib, is a human rights defender who was arrested December 29, 2020. Security agents in civilian clothes took him by force—and without prior notification— from a restaurant in the capital Rabat to the court of First Instance,
THREAD 1/
where he was brought before the prosecutor. The latter referred him to the investigating judge, who, after interrogating him without a lawyer, ordered his pretrial detention.
On October 7, 2020, the prosecutor’s office at the Rabat Court of First Instance, opened an investigation against Maati Monjib for alleged embezzlement & money laundering apparently stemming from the receipt of foreign funds to conduct training workshops for citizen journalists.
@rbalsaud Nassima al-Sada was arrested in July 2018 for her peaceful human rights work. I fear that She has been tortured in jail. She was put in solitary confinement for a year. Even now, her only contact with the outside world is a single weekly phone call. She is denied
visits with her family and lawyer. Why doesn't Saudi Arabia present Nassima al-Saud as an example of a 21st century Saudi woman? She is someone to be admired, not persecuted! She has spent her life working to improve women's lives, and seeking the freedom for them to
take an active part in Saudi society. News reports, here in the United States, for the last few years, gave the impression that Saudi Arabia was granting women more of their rights. The example always given was the right to drive. Imagine readers shock, to learn that the women