Folks, do you remember that I'm writing a sci-fi novel? Well, I'm almost done, in Italian. I did many (-many-) reviews, and I'm ready to work with an editor. However now I'm fully convinced that I can't translate it myself, I spent already an incredible amount of energy on it.
So I need an English (mother tongue) translator that translates sci-fi from Italian to English. I already tried to contact two different translators, I've the feeling that sci-fi is not something most translators are comfortable working with. Moreover I've *zero* credibility.
This is my first novel and I'm a computer programmer, many good translators only translate things of writers that have a story of successful novels, or they interface with a publisher (that I don't want to have, I'll self-publish my book).
So I wonder if somebody here knows a good translator, that writes great English prose, that translates sci-fi from Italian, and that is respectful of the original prose. Thanks in advance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A few words about the coronavirus for my dear followers. I'm in Italy right now and we are closed in our homes. We reached a very critical situation because, when it was time to act, the measures required looked too restrictive from the POV of western countries culture.
Unfortunately viruses spread regardless of what we think. The only way to stop the infection is to stay at home and to limit the contacts at every cost. The North of Italy has one of the most advanced health care of the world, yet at this point hospitals reached an hard limit.
Don't believe that this is just a flu that is a bit more severe. In Italy 8% of people in intense care units are between 20 and 49 years old. In certain hospitals the ICUs are already too busy and doctors are left having to choose who will survive based on the chances they have.
In programming there is always one point where the community splits in two, in one side people that appreciate very simple languages, and in the other people that are fascinated with the powerful languages full of abstractions.
In the past it was C vs C++, but now the same pattern applies to more modern languages. One of the reason is probably that languages that look very different give the illusion to be part of a caste of elite programmers that "get" what the others are missing.
However I think that there is a more deep meaning in all this. There are two levels of design in software. One is local: how a given function is written, certain ways you use to express a computation, and so forth. The other is more global.
I just merged SSL support into Redis unstable. This feature has an interesting story that I want to tell you. It was kinda of a "process" to reach the right solution, or at least a solution that looks a lot better than the alternatives.
Many wanted SSL in the past, however the first very serious effort at providing a concrete pull request that implemented SSL in all the channels, including Replication, Redis Sentinel, Redis Cluster, was from AWS. The work of two smart folks there.
Thanks to this work, we understood that to implement SSL just as a "minimal code change" effort was not going to work. SSL is very different from normal sockets, and has different assumptions, certain things are asynchronous where sockets are synchronous, N bytes may become M.
Redis threaded I/O small (sic) thread. So results confirmed, works great in the write side, I'll have to implement it in the read side as well. Using 4 threads it is simple to get 2x the performances of single-threaded Redis (even if yet the reading part is not threaded).
So, what's the idea here? Some people say that Redis should be threaded, a few created forks that are quite more complex. But the reality is that Redis uses a lot of time just in the reading/writing part (to the socket and in the client structure).
So... 1.5 years ago I started this project (first commit 2d546a79 is Oct 24 2017!) with this idea: Instead of making Redis threaded I just "fan out" to N threads once I need to write to (or read from) N clients.
The Redis Cluster Proxy project received some interest and questions. Here is a small thread to inform the community about what is the plan about it, and what such new Redis component will do.
First: the proxy is designed by @artiks and myself, and developed by @artiks itself, so it means there is no need to get my hands free to go forward with this project. The same setup that made the redis-cli cluster stuff possible in the latest months basically.
What is the project *main* goal? To help with the fact that the Cluster support in clients is lacking. We want a software component that can abstract away a Redis Cluster, like if it was a single Redis instance, but with certain limitations imposed in multiple-keys commands.
A serious note about this "open source software is broken because of cloud providers" thing. First and obvious: open source is not broken because the goal of OSS, historically, was not to make money, but to bring humanity forward.
Remember that the premise was *software is, and will be even more in the future, too important to be closed*. OSS wanted to fix early what could become a huge problem in the future about lack of democratization of software platforms.
Because of such premises, and because of how permissive OSS licenses are in average, they have a huge force, both positive and negative. The positive force is that a random person from Sicily can start a project that can compete on the market with huge companies.