How to actually understand labor endorsements in New York races -
If you've got a small race - city council, state senate etc. - labor matters a lot. Few people have heard of the candidates. Labor raises name rec and mobilizes their members for you. Their money goes far.
If you've got a BIG race - NYC mayor comes to mind - organized labor has diminished returns, UNLESS they all unite behind you. This is how Scott Stringer beat Eliot Spitzer.
If you've got a BIG race - NYC mayor comes to mind - an individual labor union won't move the needle much because most members will pay attention enough to develop their own opinions and views. DC37, UFT, 1199 can't just snap their fingers and tell 20k people how to vote.
Labor *can* spend a lot of money on behalf of a mayoral candidate, run IE's and member-to-member contact. The key for the non-labor candidate is to have lots of $$ and name recognition already. @AndrewYang does come to mind.
Truthfully, I only see organized labor moving the needle in this mayoral race in a BIG way if they team up to run negative TV ads and IE's AGAINST Andrew Yang. If they coordinated to crush Yang, they maybe could. It's what they did to Spitzer. But will they? Not necessarily.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Now that time has passed, the dark truth is that a large part of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's legacy will be allowing Donald Trump to nominate a strenuously pro-life Supreme Court justice. It's an unfair system we have but Ginsburg knew this. She chose not to retire.
It is not an exaggeration to say Ginsburg paved the way to allow a right-wing Republican president to pick her replacement. In 2014, it was clear Democrats were losing the Senate. And in 2016, after two terms of Obama, it was very possible a Republican would replace him.
It is difficult for me to be overly celebratory of anyone's legacy when their direct decision to not retire is tied to their replacement, who will hold views diametrically opposed to that very legacy. The Supreme Court is the institution we are stuck with. Ginsburg knew it.
The untold story is how few famous or prominent politicians want to be mayor. A huge departure from 2013, when at least five very viable Democrats tried to replace Michael Bloomberg.
Consider the field today. It's literally two elected officials of note - Borough President Eric Adams and Comptroller Scott Stringer - and a bunch of people who have never held elected office before. It may be the thinnest Democratic primary in modern history.
Going to do a Substack on this but it strikes me there are two factors at play: the terrible state NYC is in, due to COVID-19 and the subsequent economic crisis, and the nationalization of our politics, which has made relative do-nothing perches like Congress much more attractive
What will probably do Trump in is an obvious Electoral College loss. Trump survives because Republicans have his back but most Republican politicians would be fine ditching Trump and regrouping for a 2022 midterm backlash and a more reliable GOP standard bearer in 2024.
What will save Trump is a very narrow election outcome, like 2016 but in reverse, with Biden barely ahead. Then you will have chaos, court challenges, all the hell everyone is forecasting. If the national polls are a reflection of Election Day, however, that stuff may not happen.
Republican politicians tolerate Trump because he's popular with the base and appoints the judges they want. But any replacement level Republican can appoint judges. A fair amount of GOP players - Cruz, Hawley, Cotton, and others - would be okay with Trump clearing the stage
McConnell and Trump are rationally pursuing their interests in the zero-sum world of American politics. If you aren't winning, you are losing. They seek to cement the conservative majority for the next 30 years. Democrats can either recognize the war for what it is or lose.
There's actually nothing horrifying or wrong about McConnell ramming through judges. He's a right-wing ideologue doing what his party wants of him. It's up to Democrats to elect people who care this much about relentlessly helping the poor and everyone else.
The reality for Democrats is the only rational move to make, if they have a majority, is pack the court. Expand it relentlessly, rush through judges, stamp out Republicans as Republicans have chosen to stamp out Democrats
Local Democrats are literally knocking on doors and dropping off campaign literature in a crucial swing state because Joe Biden's campaign refuses to do this.
Yes, canvassing with a mask and standing six feet away from a door is possible.
There's a school of Democrats - call them the Moral Posturers, for lack of a better term - who believe all canvassing in September 2020 is murder even though census workers go door-to-door and most Americans are congregating every day.
My general view hasn't evolved much - Joe Biden is a favorite to get elected president, all numbers are in his favor - but what a tired, plodding, and forgettable campaign it has been, so poorly engaged with the grassroots.
It's wild how complacent the Joe Biden campaign is. The fact that people hate Trump enough to probably push him over the edge doesn't mean you just completely give up on actual field. Sending a text message isn't voter contact.
The best argument the Biden campaign can make against doing field is the presidential race is so polarized and there are a pretty small number of voters who can be persuaded on anything. But Republicans aren't taking Trump's campaign for granted. They're out there.
Yes, COVID-19 is still happening. At the same juncture, a person wearing a mask can knock on a door and stand 6 feet away. That isn't murder. People are outside every day congregating safely, living their lives.