1. Ok, I'm going to tell a quick story about how Republican Senator @SenToomey is sabotaging the GOP agenda on big tech and China. It's a subtle story, but here's how he's doing it. Last year, Trump's FTC filed suit to break up Facebook. But it wasn't just a GOP move.
2. In fact, GOP commissioners @FTCPhillips and @CSWilsonFTC voted *against* the suit. The Republican Chair Joe Simons, plus Democrats @chopraftc and @RKSlaughterFTC, voted for it. So it was 3-2 'break 'em up.' And Facebook then banned Trump and conservatives.
3. The suit is the result of FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra's work, who has a track record of helping honest businesses. Example: Chopra stood for Made in USA labels over Chinese counterfeiters when his GOP colleagues did not. The GOP stance angered Trump. nytimes.com/2019/04/17/us/…
4. When he was confirmed, Chopra set out an aggressive tone on corporate crime, essentially going after big tech with a memo saying 'FTC orders are not suggestions.' He opposed the $5B parking ticket to FB over Cambridge Analytica. epic.org/2018/05/ftc-co…
5. Chopra has stood up for franchises, probably the most common form of small and medium size business in America. He's a populist, pro-America vs the CCP and Sheryl Sandberg. The GOP is unhappy with Biden, but someone like Chopra is the best they can get.
6. So Chopra is an aggressive yet mainstream regulator. Tough on China, tough on big tech, honest, not partisan. Last month, Biden elevated Chopra to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, where he pledges to continue addressing big tech and China. mattstoller.substack.com/p/rohit-chopra…
7. There's a bunch of stuff in finance on big tech, including Facebook's attempt to create a global currency, and behavioral ads and usage of data. There's also the digital payments infrastructure race with China. The CFPB matters here.
8. So what happens to Chopra? Yesterday, @SenToomey, the Republican overseeing Chopra's nomination, attacks Chopra's "aggressive anti-business stances" at the FTC. Says he won't vote for him. And gets 11 other Republican Senators, who aren't paying attention, to say NO as well.
9. Now Chopra's nomination will go to the Senate floor. The vote was partisan and ugly, and a result of @SenToomey's choice in the Banking Committee to prioritize the interests of large dominant firms and Chinese interests over actually addressing threats to America.
10. The GOP is in the midst of an institutional crisis, where their voters really want action to address the private governments of big tech and to take on Chinese threats to American sovereignty. Yet their institutional actors are libertarian and oppose the people doing so.
11. Fortunately, @SenToomey is retiring in 2022, because he knows that his time is over. But he can still maintain a libertarian status quo in the face of the desire of the right to address big tech and China.
12. I hope conservatives start to address this institutional gap between their stated agenda and what their leaders are doing. Because neither China nor big tech are standing still. And honest business and American liberty is dying.
13. /Fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I love Washington, DC, both living here and the symbols of democracy. I went around the city yesterday to look at fencing and security. We have ruined neighborhoods and the physical beauty of Congress and the White House.
After changing the name of the lovely park in front of the White House from Lafayette Park to Black Lives Matter Park, they closed off public access. And took all the BLM signs down.
I've lived in DC for fifteen years, and I've seen more and more of the Capitol closed off with barricades, fences, scanners, and men with guns. Now entire formerly open and lovely streets are blocked off, for *no reason* except no leader wants to overrule bureaucrats.
1. So something extraordinary happened today on the anti-monopoly front. And not where you'd expect. Not in Congress. Or at the Federal level. Or in Europe.
But in Arizona.
Some legislators stood up to Apple and Google. And they won. This is the story.
2. Google and Apple are monopolies who control what is on your phone. Together they have 99% of the smartphone market. And they both charge high prices to app makers for the right to sell through their app stores. Apple made $64B from this tollbooth. cnbc.com/2021/01/08/app…
3. It’s basically impossible to sell mobile apps without going through the Apple/Google app stores, so they charge high prices - 30% of the take. Credit cards charge 2-3% to a merchant for access to a payment network. That's ten times Visa/MC, and Visa/MC are really greedy!
Arizona legislature debating anti-monopoly bill to force Google and Apple to compete on app distribution. azleg.gov/videoplayer/?c…
Apple has Democrats attacking the app store anti-monopoly bill by attaching an amendment mandating all savings from the bill have to go to consumers. No, this doesn't make any sense. azleg.gov/videoplayer/?c…
Democrats @KelliButlerAZ is just talking about interfering with Apple's right to contract. This is just so insane to have the progressives be the bulwark for big tech monopoly power.
Ideas flow through financed institutions. The networks that control discourse over race and gender are human resource compliance divisions. HR specialists are networked and trained, and operate across most institutions in the country.
Today, multiple Democratic Senators (Menendez and Cortez-Masto) brought up a McKinsey study on how diversity and inclusion at a board level increases corporate profits. That's a racial justice frame. mckinsey.com/featured-insig…
One reason centralizers love wokeness is because it offers a handy moral language to extend HR compliance across a larger and larger group. People mock HR compliance like everyone thinks it's bad, but HR is an important force in society with many trained professionals.
3. The Pentagon consolidated its 900 contracts with moving companies that move soldiers all over the world into one contract with American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier Group, a firm whose foreign parent was found guilty of price-fixing. mattstoller.substack.com/p/contract-bun…
House Antitrust hearing on how to break up big tech platforms is starting.
This hearing is the legislative follow-through on Congress's critical investigation into big tech. These hearings are where actual policy change occurs. @econliberties's @mh4oh will be testifying on the need for break-ups.
Now @davidcicilline is talking about Facebook as a key vector for the organizing of the riot at the Capitol. Zuckerberg said he would do nothing about it, and Cicilline says that's because of a lack of competition. He doesn't fear market repercussions.